Abstract:Background: Selecting patients for iliofemoral vein stenting has traditionally relied on the identification and quantification of stenotic lesions with imaging such as multiplanar venography. Recently, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging has become more available. However, to date, the usefulness of these imaging modalities using the customary >50% treatment threshold for diameter (multiplanar venography) and area (IVUS) stenosis of iliofemoral veins has not been validated prospectively within the context of clinical improvement. Methods: The multicenter Venogram Versus Intravascular Ultrasound for Diagnosing and Treating Iliofemoral Vein Obstruction (VIDIO) trial prospectively enrolled 100 symptomatic patients (Clinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic [CEAP] classification of 4-6) with suspected iliofemoral venous outflow disease. Venous stenting for presumed significant iliofemoral vein stenosis, based on imaging and clinical findings, was performed on 68 patients. Based on imaging, stenosis was characterized as nonthrombotic in 48 patients and post-thrombotic in 20 patients. Each underwent baseline and poststenting venography and IVUS to compare the diagnostic and clinical usefulness of the tests. The revised Venous Clinical Severity Score was used to assess clinical patient outcome. A >4-point reduction in the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score between baseline and 6 months was used as an indicator of clinically meaningful improvement. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal diameter and area thresholds for prediction of clinical improvement. Results: Clinical improvement after stenting was best predicted by IVUS baseline measurement of area stenosis (area under the curve, 0.64; P = .04), with >54% estimated as the optimal threshold of stenosis indicating interventional treatment. With measurement of lumen gain from baseline to after the procedure, the optimal reduction in vein stenosis correlative of later clinical improvement was >41%; IVUS measurement of area stenosis was most predictive (area under the curve, 0.70; P = .004). Venographic measurements of baseline stenosis and stenotic change were not predictive of later improvement. In a 48-patient nonthrombotic subset analysis, IVUS diameter rather than area measurements of baseline stenosis were significantly predictive of clinical success, but indicated a higher optimal threshold of stenosis (>61%) may be necessary. Conclusions: This study suggests that IVUS shows significant usefulness at predicting when stenting iliofemoral vein stenosis in patients clinical-etiologic-anatomic-pathophysiologic classification of 4-6 will result in significant symptom improvement. Our findings corroborate the conventional >50% cross-sectional area threshold by IVUS as defining a clinically significant iliofemoral stenosis that, when stented, has significant predictive value for symptom improvement. In nonthrombotic patients, however, a threshold of >61% diameter stenosis by IVUS may better predict clinical improvement.

Iliac vein obstruction: accuracy of Direct Multidetector Computed Tomographic Venography and duplex ultrasound

Application of computed tomography venography in the diagnosis and severity assessment of iliac vein compression syndrome: A retrospective study

Predicting Iliac Vein Compression With Computed Tomography Angiography and Venography: Correlation With Intravascular Ultrasound

Analysis of computed tomography venography for the diagnosis and endovascular treatment of iliac venous compression syndrome with venous leg ulcers: a retrospective study

CT venography for deep venous thrombosis: Can it predict catheter-directed thrombolysis prognosis in patients with iliac vein compression syndrome?

Diagnostic Value of the Iliac Vein Stenosis Percentage Combined With Indicators of Venous Reflux for Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome With Computed Tomography Venography

PC180. Iliac-femoral Post-Thrombotic Syndrome: Three-Dimensional CT Venography for Preintervention Evaluation and Midterm Stent Patency Follow-up

Efficacy of ultrasound in the evaluation of iliac vein stenting.

Multi-slice spiral CT venography and digital subtraction venography for the diagnosis of iliac vein compression syndrome: a comparison study

The Diagnostic Value of Indirect Lower Limb CT Venography in the Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis

Comparison of Intravascular Ultrasound and Venography in the Intraoperative Evaluation of Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome

C-arm-based flat-panel detector cone-beam computed tomography venography in the diagnosis of iliac vein compression syndrome

Validation of venous duplex ultrasound imaging in determining iliac vein stenosis after standard treatment of active chronic venous ulcers

The Diagnostic Value of CT Angiography in Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome and Secondary Thrombosis

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis

Role of three-dimensional computed tomography venography as a powerful navigator for varicose vein surgery

Analysis of threshold stenosis by multiplanar venogram and intravascular ultrasound examination for predicting clinical improvement after iliofemoral vein stenting in the VIDIO trial

The value of three-dimension digital subtraction angiography in diagnosis and treatment of iliac vein compression syndrome

Efficacy of modified time of flight magnetic resonance venography in diagnosis of iliac vein compression syndrome

The Beneficial Role of Intravascular Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonthrombotic Iliac Venous Obstructions As Compared with Traditional Venography in the Chinese Population

Effect of Interventional Therapy on Iliac Venous Compression Syndrome Evaluated and Diagnosed by Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based Ultrasound Images