Properties and intracellular localization of phosphatidylinositol transfer protein in Swiss mouse 3T3 cells.

G. Snoek,I. D. de Wit,K. Wirtz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0210244

1993-05-01

Biochemical Society Transactions

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comparative analysis of negative pressure wound therapy (PICO) and standard dressing application after arterial vascular reconstructions

Valentyna Kostiuk,Soraya Fereydooni,Ocean Setia,Sarah A Loh,David Strosberg,Britt H Tonnessen,Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar,Edouard Aboian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241296606

IF: 1.1

2024-10-27

Vascular

Abstract:Vascular, Ahead of Print. IntroductionSurgical site infections following arterial reconstructions with femoral exposures are common and potentially preventable. Negative pressure wound therapy has emerged as a potential solution to minimize groin wound complications. Our study evaluates efficacy of a negative pressure therapy (PICO dressing) in reducing groin wound complications after vascular reconstructions.MethodsA retrospective single center comparative analysis of vascular reconstructions involving common femoral artery dissection was performed between July 2021 and June 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: patients treated with PICO device and patients who received standard dressing (non-PICO). Patient demographics, comorbidities, vascular evaluation, and procedure indications were compared. Previous interventions, incision orientation and procedure types were noted. The wound complication categories were graded according to the Szilagyi classification: grade 1 (superficial infection/minor dehiscence), grade 2 (deep infection/major dehiscence), and grade 3 (artery or prosthetic involvement). Statistical significance level was determined at p < .05 for all analyses.ResultsA total of 217 groin dissections in 184 patients were analyzed with 132 and 85 groin dissections in the PICO and non-PICO groups, respectively. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups in terms of age, sex, BMI, and procedure indications. Prior endovascular procedures and re-operative groin surgeries were more prevalent in the PICO group. The use of antibiotics post-operatively for groin wound complication was greater in the non-PICO group. The incidence of wound complications was higher in the non-PICO group (29.4% vs 10.6%, p < .001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined that PICO dressing as well as hybrid and endovascular index procedures were associated with lower risks of groin complications.ConclusionPICO dressing decreased the incidence of groin wound complications in patients undergoing open vascular reconstructions. This study highlights the value of adjunctive negative pressure therapy in reduction of wound complications after arterial reconstructions in the inguinal region.

peripheral vascular disease
Meta-Analysis of Comparative Trials Evaluating a Prophylactic Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System for the Prevention of Surgical Site Complications

Vicki Strugala,Robin Martin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2017.156

2017-10-01

Surgical Infections

Abstract:BACKGROUND: We report the first meta-analysis on the impact of prophylactic use of a specific design of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) device on surgical site complications.METHODS: Articles were identified in which the specific single-use NPWT device (PICO<sup>⋄</sup>, Smith & Nephew) was compared with standard care for surgical site infection (SSI), dehiscence, or length of stay (LOS). Risk ratio (RR) ±95% confidence interval (CI) (SSI; dehiscence) or mean difference in LOS ±95% CI was calculated using RevMan v5.3.RESULTS: There were 1863 patients (2202 incisions) represented by 16 articles. Among 10 randomized studies, there was a significant reduction in SSI rate of 51% from 9.7% to 4.8% with NPWT intervention (RR 0.49 [95% CI 0.34-0.69] p < 0.0001). There were six observational studies assessing reduction in SSI rate of 67% from 22.5% to 7.4% with NPWT (RR 0. 32 [95% CI 0.18-0.55] p < 0.0001). Combining all 16 studies, there was a significant reduction in SSI of 58% from 12.5% to 5.2% with NPWT (RR 0.43 [95% CI 0.32-0.57] p < 0.0001). Similar effects were seen irrespective of the kind of surgery (orthopedic, abdominal, colorectal, or cesarean section), although the numbers needed to treat (NNT) were lower in operations with higher frequencies of complications. There was a significant reduction in dehiscence from 17.4% to 12.8% with NPWT (RR 0.71 [95% CI 0.54-0.92] p < 0.01). The mean reduction in hospital LOS by NPWT was also significant (-0.47 days [95% CI -0.71 to -0.23] p < 0.0001).CONCLUSIONS: The significant reduction in SSI, wound dehiscence, and LOS on the basis of pooled data from 16 studies shows a benefit of the PICO single-use NPWT system compared with standard care in closed surgical incisions.

infectious diseases,surgery
Prophylactic closed-incisional negative pressure wound therapy following posterior instrumented spinal fusion: a single surgeon's experience and cost-benefit analysis

Dallas E. Kramer,Rosh Bharthi,Daniel Myers,Patrick Chang,Rocco Dabecco,Chen Xu,Alexander Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03083-8

IF: 2.8

2024-11-22

Neurosurgical Review

Abstract:Purpose: Surgical site infections (SSIs) following spine surgery are associated with morbidity and resource utilization. Applying prophylactic closed-incisional negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) during posterior instrumented fusion has mixed results in reducing rates of wound complications and SSI. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and potential cost-savings associated with ciNPWT in high-risk patients receiving posterior instrumented spinal fusion. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients receiving posterior instrumented spinal fusion for any surgical indication between July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019, and compared rates of wound dehiscence, SSI, and reoperation for wound complications between standard surgical dressings and ciNPWT. Surgical dressing selection was based on the senior author's assessment of infection risk factors. Results: A total of 229 patients ( n = 85 standard surgical dressings, n = 144 ciNPWT) were included. The ciNPWT group had significantly more risk factors for wound-related complications, including older age (61.8 vs. 58.5 years, p = 0.042), diabetes mellitus (36.8% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.037), more instrumented levels (5.6 vs. 3.9, p < 0.0001), estimated blood loss (1298 vs. 998 mL, p = 0.036), and deformity was the predominant operative indication (29.9% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.040). Prophylactic ciNPWT was associated with significantly lower rates of wound dehiscence (21.5% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.036) and SSI (8.3% vs. 21.2%, p = 0.005). Number needed to treat with ciNPWT to prevent one SSI was 8 patients. The cost of preventing one SSI was 21,662 per operative SSI prevented and $270,775 per 100 patients undergoing posterior instrumented fusion with ciNPWT. Conclusions: Prophylactic ciNPWT use is a cost-effective means of reducing rates of wound dehiscence and SSI following posterior instrumented fusion.

surgery,clinical neurology
Surgical site infection outcomes of two different closed incision negative pressure therapy systems in cardiac surgery: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

Mahmoud Loubani,Matthew Cooper,Ronald Silverman,Christine Bongards,Leah Griffin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14599

2024-01-19

International Wound Journal

Abstract:Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) system use compared with standard of care dressings (SOC) on surgical site infection (SSI) in cardiac surgery was assessed. A systematic literature review was conducted. Risk ratios (RR) and random effects models were used to assess ciNPT with foam dressing (ciNPT‐F) or multilayer absorbent dressing (ciNPT‐MLA) versus SOC. Health economic models were developed to assess potential per patient cost savings. Eight studies were included in the ciNPT‐F analysis and four studies were included in the ciNPT‐MLA analysis. For ciNPT‐F, a significant reduction in SSI incidence was observed (RR: 0.507, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.362, 0.709; p

dermatology,surgery
Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Surgical Site Infections in Closed Abdominal Incision- A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Maharjan Manik,Amaranathan Anandhi,Sathasivam Sureshkumar,Andi Rajendharan Keerthi,Mahalingam Sudharshan,Vikram Kate

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0052

2023-08-31

Advances in Wound Care

Abstract:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (PNPWT) in reducing the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI), and other wound complications in closed abdominal incisions. Approach: This was a prospective, single-center, open-label parallel arm superiority randomized controlled trial conducted over 2 years. Participants were randomly assigned to PNPWT and standard surgical dressing (SSD) group. The occurrence of postoperative SSI within 30 days, other wound related complications, length of hospital stay, and readmission within 1 month among both the study group were studied. Results: A total of 140 participants were included, with 70 each randomized to the PNPWT and SSD groups. In this study, 28.5% and 5.8% developed SSI in the SSD and PNPWT groups respectively (RR-0.26; 95%, CI-0.08-0.80; p=0.001). Similarly, the incidence of seroma (7.2% vs 18.5%, p=0.016), wound dehiscence (0 vs 4.2%, p=0.244), superficial & deep SSI (5.7% vs 24.3%, p=0.001) & (0 vs 4.2%, p=0.244) and length of hospital stay (days) (9 vs 10.5, p=0.07) were less in PNPWT compared to SSD group. Innovation: Despite the advances in surgical care, SSI rates continues to be high. The present findings might facilitate the use of PNPWT as a novel preventive strategy to reduce SSI in closed abdominal incision. Conclusion: The PNPWT in closed incisions following elective laparotomy can reduce the incidence of SSI when compared to SSD. The use of PNPWT was associated with a lower incidence of superficial SSI and seroma but without significant reduction in hospital stay.

dermatology
Evaluation of Negative Pressure Dressings for Closed Surgical Incisions in Decreasing Surgical Site Infections After Emergency Laparotomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Kartik Sahni,Shridhar Hosamani,Deepak Ghuliani,Shikha Baisoya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.67500

2024-08-22

Cureus

Abstract:Objectives The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of negative pressure dressings (NPDs) versus conventional dressings for closed surgical incisions after emergency midline laparotomy, focusing on their impact on surgical site infection (SSI) rates, wound dehiscence, hospital stay duration, and cosmetic outcomes. Methods The randomized controlled study was conducted over 24 months, involving 80 patients aged 18-65 years who had peritonitis and underwent emergency midline laparotomies. Patients with diabetes mellitus, a BMI >35 kg/m², immunocompromised conditions, or those requiring re-exploration within 30 days of surgery were excluded. The participants were randomly assigned into two groups using a computer-generated randomization table: Group A, the case group, consisted of 40 patients who received NPDs, while Group B, the control group, included 40 patients who received conventional dressings. Data were recorded in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results The overall occurrence of SSIs within the 30-day follow-up period was significantly lower in the NPD group compared to the conventional dressing group (30% vs. 70%, p < 0.05). The mean duration of hospital stay was 14.85 ± 10.43 days for the NPD group and 15.4 ± 9.75 days for the control group, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.712). The mean Vancouver Scar Scale score was 5.3 ± 2.47 in the NPD group and 6.5 ± 2.14 in the control group, also showing no statistically significant difference (p = 0.11). Conclusions NPDs significantly reduced the incidence of SSIs compared to conventional dressings, but they did not have a significant impact on scar cosmesis or the duration of hospital stay.
A case-control study on risk factors for postoperative nosocomial infections in patients with orthopedics operation

Xiao-xia JIANG,Kun CHEN,mei YANG,En-ping CHEN,Si-yuan HUANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2018.03.004

2018-01-01

Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract:Objective To determine the risk factors of postoperative nosocomial infections (NI) in patients of orthopedics department of a PLA hospital, in order to provide the theory basis for prevention and control of postoperative nosocomial infections in patients of orthopedics department. Methods Using the real-time nosocomial infection surveillance system, we selected and retrospectively reviewed the patients after orthopedics operation and the patients with postoperative NI from Jan. 2013 to Dec. 2015. A 1:1 matched case-control study was carried out. Controls were patients with the same period of hospitalization, the same department, the same sex and age difference of 5 years old, the same main diagnosis without NI. The data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression. Results In the survey of 13134 patients after orthopedics operation, there were 91 patients with postoperative NI and the infection rate was 0.69％. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that who had admitted to the ICU (OR=103.128, 95％ CI: 1.470-7237.388) , with a high level of incision contamination (OR=24.097, 95％ CI: 1.428-406.725) , perioperative use of antimicrobial for prophylactic utilization (OR=12.534, 95％ CI:3.460-45.407) and using hormones before nosocomial infection (OR=6.872, 95％CI: 1.374-34.384) was a risk factor for postoperative NI. Conclusion The postoperative NI in patients of orthopedics department was at a low level, and patients who had admitted to the ICU, with a high level of incision contamination, irrational perioperative use of antimicrobial agents, using hormones before nosocomial infection will increase the incidence of postoperative NI.
Atrial Adipofibrosis in a Dog

Y. Une,Norihiko Furusawa,K. Shirota,Y. Nomura

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104063879801000217

1998-04-01

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

Abstract:have been respectively identified in Uhl’s anomaly 12 and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia of humans. 8 Here, we report a case of severe muscle deficit associated with fatty infiltration and fibroplasia in the atria of a dog. A 16-month-old male crossbred Chow Chow dog was admitted to a veterinary clinic with severe abdominal distension. Pulse was low (45 beats/minute), and radiographs of the chest demonstrated a severely enlarged, round cardiac silhouette. Electrocardiography revealed no P wave at any leads, prolonged QRS time, and slightly large T waves. Injection of atropine sulfate failed to increase heart rate or resuscitate a P wave. The case was clinically diagnosed as persistent atrial standstill. Treatment for symptoms was initiated, employing diuretic cardiac stimulants (furosemide and digoxin) to remove ascites. Initial treatment was successful; however, ascites recurred soon after therapy was discontinued. No motor disturbance was observed at any time. The dog died at 27 months of age, 11 months after initial consultation. The littermates of the affected dog died soon after birth, but no details about them or any other litters from the same parents were available.
Risk Factors for Postoperative Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Spinal Tumor Surgery

Baoquan Xin,Shuang Cao,Guangjian Bai,Xing Huang,Chen Ye,Runlin Hu,Xin Gao,Weiwei Zou,Tielong Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001494

2023-01-01

Abstract:Study Design:A retrospective comparative case-control study.Objective:The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) in patients with spinal tumors requiring reoperation during the perioperative period.Summary of Background Data:SSI is a common postoperative complication of spinal surgery. The occurrence of SSI not only increases the mortality rate but prolongs the patient's hospital stay and increases the medical cost.Methods:Included in this study were 202 patients with spinal tumors who received surgical treatment between January 2008 and December 2018, of whom 101 patients who developed SSI and underwent secondary surgery were used as the SSI group, and the other 101 patients with no SSI who were matched with the SSI group by age (+/- 10), pathologic diagnosis (malignant/no-malignant), tumor site (C/T/L/S), surgical approach (anterior/posterior/combined), and surgical team were used as the control group. The clinical data of the 202 patients in both groups were analyzed by logistic regression modeling to identify SSI-associated risk factors.Results:Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the revision status (B=1.430, P=0.028), the number of spinal levels fused >= 4 (B=0.963, P=0.006), and the use of bone cement (B=0.739, P=0.046) were significantly associated with the increased risk of developing postoperative SSI.Conclusions:This study identified the revision status, the number of spinal levels fused >= 4, and the use of bone cement as independent risk factors for SSI in patients with spinal tumors who underwent reoperation during the perioperative period.
412 Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Following Posterior Instrumented Spinal Fusion: A Single Surgeon’s Experience and Cost-Benefit Analysis

Dallas E. Kramer,Rosh Bharthi,Daniel Myers,Patrick Chang,Rocco M. Dabecco,Chen Xu,Alexander Kwong-Tak Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002809_412

IF: 5.315

2024-04-01

Neurosurgery

Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) following spine surgery are associated with significant morbidity and resource utilization. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who received posterior instrumented spinal fusion by the senior author between July 2017 and December 2019 at a Level I trauma center. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and Student’s t-tests. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients with standard surgical dressings and 144 patients with iNPWT were included for analysis. Patients in the iNPWT group were significantly older (61.8 vs. 58.5 years, p = 0.042) and more likely to be diabetic (36.8% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.037). Surgeries in the iNPWT group were associated with significantly greater blood loss (1298 mL vs. 998 mL, p = 0.036) and involved more instrumented levels (6.6 vs. 4.9, p < 0.0001). Prophylactic iNPWT use was associated with significantly lower rates of wound dehiscence (21.5% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.036) and SSI requiring operative treatment (8.3% vs. 21.2%, p = 0.005). The incidence of wound dehiscence requiring operative wound revision was lower with iNPWT (14.6% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.056), though it did not reach statistical significance. Number needed to treat (NNT) with iNPWT to prevent one SSI was 7.79. The cost of preventing one operative SSI was $5,096. Cost-benefit analysis demonstrated a potential mean savings of $26,149 per operative SSI and $326,862 per 100 patients undergoing posterior instrumented spinal fusion with iNPWT. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic iNPWT use significantly reduced rates of wound dehiscence, SSI requiring operative treatment, and affords a potential SSI-related cost savings of $326,862 per 100 patients treated.

surgery,clinical neurology
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Superficial Surgical Site Infections After Open Colon Surgery: A NSQIP-Colectomy Study

Marc M. Mankarious,Nina L. Eng,Austin C. Portolese,Michael J. Deutsch,Patricio Lynn,Audrey S. Kulaylat,Jeffrey S. Scow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.01.005

IF: 8.944

2024-01-25

Journal of Hospital Infection

Abstract:Summary Background The use of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) has increased in the last decade across surgical fields, including colectomy. Aim Compare postoperative outcomes associated with use of (iNPWT) following open colectomy from a large national database. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent operations from 2015-2020 was performed using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Targeted Colectomy Database. Intraoperative placement of iNPWT was identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes in patients undergoing open abdominal operations with closure of all wound layers including skin. Propensity score matching was performed to define a control group who underwent closure of all wound layers without iNPWT. Patients were matched in a 1:4 (iNPWT vs. control) ratio and postoperative rates of superficial, deep and organ-space SSI, wound disruption, and readmission. Results Between 2015-2020, iNPWT was used in 483 (0.6%) undergoing open colectomies. A matched cohort of 1884 was selected. Patients with iNPWT had longer median operative time (170 [IQR 129-232] vs. 161[IQR:114-226] minutes, p<0.05) (Table 2). Compared to patients without iNPWT, Patients with iNPWT experienced a lower rate of 30-day superficial incisional SSI (3% vs. 7%, p<0.05) and readmissions (10% vs 14%; p < 0.05). iNPWT did not decrease risk of deep SSI, organ-space SSI, or wound disruption. Conclusion Although there is a slightly increased operative time, utilization of iNPWT in open colectomy is associated with lower odds of superficial SSI and 30-day readmission. This suggests that iNPWT should be routinely utilized in open colon surgery to improve patient outcomes.

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
Influence of closed‐incision negative‐pressure wound therapy on the incidence of surgical site wound infection in patients undergoing spine surgery: A meta‐analysis

Zhi‐Shen Liu,Shao‐Bin Tian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14317

2023-08-01

International Wound Journal

Abstract:The present meta‐analysis was conducted to comprehensively assess the impact of closed‐incision negative‐pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) on the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery, thereby aiming to provide evidence‐based support for the prevention of postoperative wound infections during spinal surgery. Relevant studies pertaining to the application of ciNPWT in spinal surgery were retrieved through searches of the PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases, spanning from their inception to May 2023. The literature screening and data extraction were performed by two researchers based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by a quality assessment of the included studies. Meta‐analyses were performed using the odds ratios (ORs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) as effect variables. RevMan 14.0 and STATA 17.0 were employed for meta‐analysis of the extracted data. In total, eight articles involving 1198 patients, including 391 in the experimental group and 807 in the control group, were included. The meta‐analysis results revealed that ciNPWT significantly reduced the incidence of SSIs in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery (OR, 0.39; 95% CI: 0.22–0.67, p = 0.0007); however, it did not lead to a reduction in hospital stay duration (SMD: −0.48, 95% CI: −0.98 to 0.01, p = 0.06). Existing evidence suggests that ciNPWT has a positive impact on patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery, as it significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative surgical site wound infections; however, it does not result in a shorter hospital stay for patients.

dermatology,surgery
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the reduction of surgical site infection in closed incision management versus standard of care dressings over closed vascular groin incisions

Alexander Gombert,Ellen Dillavou,Ralph D’Agostino,Leah Griffin,Julie M Robertson,Mark Eells

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1708538119890960

IF: 1.1

2020-01-19

Vascular

Abstract:Objective Surgical site infection after groin incision is a common complication and a financial burden to patients and healthcare systems. Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been associated with decreased surgical site infection rates in published literature. This meta-analysis examines the effect of ciNPT (PREVENATM Incision Management System; KCI, San Antonio, TX) versus traditional postsurgical dressing use in reducing surgical site infection rates over closed groin incisions following vascular surgery. Methods A systematic literature search using PubMed, OVID, EMBASE, and QUOSA was performed on 3 January 2019, by two independent researchers and focused on publications between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2018. The review conformed to the statement and reporting check list of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses. Inclusion criteria included abstract or manuscript written in English, published studies, conference abstracts, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), ciNPT usage over closed groin incisions in vascular surgery, comparison of ciNPT use and traditional dressings, study endpoint/outcome of surgical site infection, and study population of >10. Characteristics of study participants, surgical procedure, type of dressing used, duration of treatment, incidence of surgical site infection, and length of follow-up were extracted. Weighted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to pool study and control groups in each publication for analysis. Treatment effects were combined using Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios, and the Chi-Square test was used to assess heterogeneity. Overall, high-risk patients, normal-risk patients, and Szilagyi I, II, III outcomes were assessed between ciNPT and control groups. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was utilized to assess the risk of bias for all studies included in the analysis. Results A total of 615 articles were identified from the literature search. After removal of excluded studies and duplicates, six RCT studies were available for analysis. In these studies, a total of 362 patients received ciNPT, and 371 patients received traditional dressings (control). Surgical site infection events occurred in 41 ciNPT patients and 107 control patients. The heterogeneity test was nonsignificant ( p > 0.05). The overall RCT meta-analysis showed a highly significant effect in favor of ciNPT (OR = 3.06, 95% CI [2.05, 4.58], p < 0.05). High-risk, normal-risk, Szilagyi I, and Szilagyi II meta-analyses were also statistically significant in favor of ciNPT use ( p < 0.05). The varying RCT inclusion/exclusion criteria, such as differences in procedure types, and patient populations form the major limitations of this study. Conclusions A statistically significant reduction in the incidence of surgical site infection was seen following ciNPT usage in patients undergoing vascular surgery with groin incisions.

peripheral vascular disease
The prophylactic use of negative-pressure wound therapy after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis

A. Fiocco,M. Dini,G. Lorenzoni,D. Gregori,A. Colli,L. Besola

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.04.003

IF: 8.944

2024-05-11

Journal of Hospital Infection

Abstract:Summary Surgical site infections (SSIs) pose a frequent complication in cardiac surgery patients and lead to increased patient discomfort and extended hospitalization. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the protective role of single-use negative-pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) devices on closed surgical wounds after cardiac surgery, and explored their potential preventive application across all cardiac surgery patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on ScienceDirect, focusing on studies related to "negative pressure wound therapy" or "PICO negative pressure wound therapy" combined with "cardiac surgery" or "sternotomy," published between 2000 and 2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed case–control studies comparing sNPWT with traditional dressings on closed cardiac surgical incisions in adult patients undergoing median sternotomy without immediate postoperative infective complications, with available details on SSIs. A retrospective analysis of cases treated with sNPWT in our centre was also performed. The meta-analysis revealed a protective role of sNPWT, indicating a 44% risk reduction in overall SSIs (odds ratio 0.56) and a 40% risk reduction in deep wound infections (odds ratio 0.60). Superficial wound infections, however, showed non-significant protective effects. A single-centre study aligned with the meta-analysis findings, confirming the efficacy of sNPWT and was included in the meta-analysis. In conclusion, the meta-analysis and the single-centre study collectively support the protective role of negative pressure wound therapy against overall and deep SSIs, suggesting its potential prophylactic use on all cardiac surgery populations.

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
Proceedings: Neutralization of the lethal effects of phalloidine and alpha-amanitine in animal experiments by substances from the seeds of Silybum marianum l. gaertn.

G. Vogel,W. Trost

Abstract:
Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on the incidence of deep surgical site infections after orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Huan Liu,Ge Zhang,An Wei,Hao Xing,Changsheng Han,Zhengqi Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05038-7

2024-09-09

Abstract:Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to explore the impact of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on the occurrence of deep surgical site infections (SSIs) following orthopedic surgery. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for articles concerning NPWT in patients who underwent orthopedic surgery up to May 20, 2024. Using Stata 15.0, the combined odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with either a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity values. Results: From a total of 440 publications, studies that utilized NPWT as the experimental group and conventional dressings as the control group were selected to analyze their impact on SSIs. Ultimately, 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. These included 12 randomized controlled trials and 20 cohort studies, involving 7454 patients, with 3533 of whom received NPWT and 3921 of whom were treated with conventional dressings. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that the NPWT group had a lower incidence of deep SSIs in orthopedic surgeries than did the control group [OR 0.64, 95% CI (0.52, 0.80), P = 0.0001]. Subgroup analysis indicated a notable difference for trauma surgeries [OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.50, 0.83), P = 0.001], whereas joint surgeries [OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.38, 1.12), P = 0.122] and spine surgeries [OR 0.61, 95% CI (0.27, 1.35), P = 0.221] did not show significant differences. Additionally, when examined separately according to heterogeneity, trauma surgeries exhibited a significant difference [OR 0.50, 95% CI (0.31, 0.80), P = 0.004]. Conclusion: The results of our study indicate that the prophylactic use of NPWT reduces the incidence of deep SSIs following orthopedic trauma surgery when compared to the use of conventional dressings. We postulate that the prophylactic application of NPWT in patients at high risk of developing complications from bone trauma may result in improved clinical outcomes and an enhanced patient prognosis.
Spine surgical site infection outcome with preoperative application of a presaturated 10% povidone-iodine nasal decolonization product in a 32-bed surgical hospital

Patti S Grant,Caitlin Crews-Stowe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.09.016

2024-10-01

Abstract:Background: To pursue an irreducible minimum overall surgical site infection (SSI) rate, a 32-bed surgical hospital employed an outside consultant and performed sterile processing and surgery internal audits: No obvious improvements were identified. A 10-year review determined that 70% of SSI's were spine procedure patients. After a nasal decolonization product literature review, an intervention was implemented. The purpose of this study was to assess if the intervention impacted spine SSI rates. Methods: A 36-month implementation science study was conducted. The 18-month intervention was the immediate preoperative application of a manufactured presaturated 10% povidone-iodine nasal decolonization product in spine surgery patients, with monthly product application documentation surveillance feedback to the preoperative staff. Chi-square test was used to determine the difference in types of spine SSI surgery rates pre and post intervention. Results: Overall spine SSI decreased 35.7% (P = .04) with a 58.7% reduction in superficial incisional SSI (P = .02). The 16.1% decline in deep incisional SSI was not significant (P = .29). Conclusions: Within this hospital, conducting 7,576 surgical spine procedures over 36 months, with the immediate preoperative application of a presaturated 10% povidone-iodine nasal decolonization product, the only intervention in SSI prevention protocol, produced a statistically significant decrease in spine patient SSI rate percent.
Does intraoperative wound irrigation with diluted povidone-iodine prevent surgical site infection in spine surgery?

Xiaoping Mu,Xiaodong Wei,Zhuhai Li,Minke Wei,Jianxun Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/eor-24-0091

IF: 4.775

2024-11-09

EFORT Open Reviews

Abstract:Purpose This study employed meta-analysis to evaluate whether the application of intraoperative wound irrigation (IOWI) with povidone-iodine (PI) in spine surgery effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI). Methods The present study was conducted strictly following the methodological guidance provided by the Cochrane Handbook. The protocol of this work was registered with PROSPERO. Two researchers independently conducted electronic searches in Medline via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The bias risk of each included study was evaluated by two assessors. We performed statistical analysis on the dataset using STATA software. Results Fourteen studies involving a total of 6777 patients were included in the present work. The risk of bias of six included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was considered as low-to-moderate risk, and the quality scores of the eight included retrospective cohort studies were rated as high quality. The results of this meta-analysis indicated a significant difference in the incidence of postoperative SSI between the two groups (RR = 0.29, 95% CI: (0.18, 0.47)). Moreover, patients who underwent IOWI with PI had lower rates of deep and superficial infections after spine surgery compared with the controlled group (superficial infection: RR = 0.28, 95%CI: (0.14, 0.54); Deep infection: RR = 0.24, 95%CI: (0.10, 0.60)). The sensitivity analysis results indicated good robustness and high evidence strength after data consolidation in the overall rate of postoperative SSI and the incidence of deep/superficial infection. Conclusions IOWI with PI solution during spinal surgery can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative SSI.

orthopedics
Comparison of surgical site infection (SSI) between negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) assisted delayed primary closure and conventional delayed primary closure in grossly contaminated emergency abdominal surgeries: a randomized controlled trial

Pradeep Kumar Singh,Mahesh Kumar Sethi,Tushar Subhadarshan Mishra,Pankaj Kumar,S Manwar Ali,Prakash Kumar Sasmal,Swastik Sourav Mishra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03202-x

2023-12-27

Abstract:Purpose: NPWT has been tried in many surgical fields, including colorectal, thoracic, vascular, and non-healing wounds, for the prevention of SSI. However, its efficacy in the prevention of SSI-grade IV closed abdominal wounds is yet to be explored. Methods: All patients with grade IV abdominal wounds were included in the study. They were randomized into the conventional arm and the VAC arm after confirming the diagnosis intra-operatively. The sheath was closed, and the skin was laid open in the postoperative period. In the VAC arm, the NPWT dressing was applied on postoperative day (POD)-1 and removed on POD-5. In the conventional arm, only regular dressing was done postoperatively. The skin was closed with a delayed primary intention on POD-5 in both arms. The sutures were removed after 7 to 10 days of skin closure. Results: The rate of SSI (10% in the VAC arm vs. 37.5% in the conventional arm, p-value = 0.004) was significantly lower in the VAC arm, as were the rates of seroma formation (2.4% in the VAC arm vs. 20% in the conventional arm, p = 0.014) and wound dehiscence (7.3% vs. 30%, p = 0.011). The conventional arm had a significant delay in skin closure beyond POD5 due to an increased rate of SSI, which also led to a prolonged hospital stay (5 days in the VAC arm vs. 6.5 days in the conventional arm, p-value = 0.005). Conclusion: The VAC dressing can be used routinely in grade IV closed abdominal wounds to reduce the risk of SSI and wound dehiscence.
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Versus Traditional Dressings for Low Transverse Abdominal Incisions Healing by Primary Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lucas Gallo,Matteo Gallo,Brian Chin,Andrea Copeland,Ronen Avram,Mark McRae,Matthew McRae,Achilleas Thoma,Christopher J Coroneos,Sophocles H Voineskos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503211073840

Abstract:Background: Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) devices may reduce wound healing complications when applied to closed surgical incisions. The aim of this review was to assess the effects of ciNPT versus standard dressings in patients undergoing primary closure of high tension, lower transverse abdominal incisions. Methods: This review was registered a priori on PROSPERO (CRD42021252048). A search of the following databases was performed in February 2021: Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Unpublished trials were searched using clinicaltrials.gov. All randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing ciNPT to standard dressings were included. Two independent reviewers performed screening and data extraction. Outcomes evaluated the incidence of wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, total abdominal complications, time to drain removal, and seroma formation. Main Results: Ten studies were included in quantitative and narrative synthesis. Observational study evidence suggests ciNPT likely reduces the incidence of wound dehiscence (odds ratio [OR] 0.57 [0.44-0.96], P = .03) and total abdominal complications (OR 0.34 [0.21-0.54], P < .01). Decreased incidence of seroma formation favored ciNPT (OR 0.65 [0.24-1.76], P = .40); however, this did not achieve significance. Randomized and non-randomized study evidence was very uncertain about the effect of ciNPT on the remaining outcomes. Conclusions: The current best randomized study evidence is very uncertain about the effect of ciNPT on these outcomes. Observational study evidence suggests ciNPT likely results in a statistically significant reduction in abdominal wound dehiscence and total abdominal complications. Additional randomized trials are warranted to limit the impact of bias on the overall certainty of the evidence.

Properties and intracellular localization of phosphatidylinositol transfer protein in Swiss mouse 3T3 cells.

Comparative analysis of negative pressure wound therapy (PICO) and standard dressing application after arterial vascular reconstructions

Meta-Analysis of Comparative Trials Evaluating a Prophylactic Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System for the Prevention of Surgical Site Complications

Prophylactic closed-incisional negative pressure wound therapy following posterior instrumented spinal fusion: a single surgeon's experience and cost-benefit analysis

Surgical site infection outcomes of two different closed incision negative pressure therapy systems in cardiac surgery: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Surgical Site Infections in Closed Abdominal Incision- A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Evaluation of Negative Pressure Dressings for Closed Surgical Incisions in Decreasing Surgical Site Infections After Emergency Laparotomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

A case-control study on risk factors for postoperative nosocomial infections in patients with orthopedics operation

Atrial Adipofibrosis in a Dog

Risk Factors for Postoperative Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Spinal Tumor Surgery

412 Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Following Posterior Instrumented Spinal Fusion: A Single Surgeon’s Experience and Cost-Benefit Analysis

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Superficial Surgical Site Infections After Open Colon Surgery: A NSQIP-Colectomy Study

Influence of closed‐incision negative‐pressure wound therapy on the incidence of surgical site wound infection in patients undergoing spine surgery: A meta‐analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the reduction of surgical site infection in closed incision management versus standard of care dressings over closed vascular groin incisions

The prophylactic use of negative-pressure wound therapy after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis

Proceedings: Neutralization of the lethal effects of phalloidine and alpha-amanitine in animal experiments by substances from the seeds of Silybum marianum l. gaertn.

Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on the incidence of deep surgical site infections after orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Spine surgical site infection outcome with preoperative application of a presaturated 10% povidone-iodine nasal decolonization product in a 32-bed surgical hospital

Does intraoperative wound irrigation with diluted povidone-iodine prevent surgical site infection in spine surgery?

Comparison of surgical site infection (SSI) between negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) assisted delayed primary closure and conventional delayed primary closure in grossly contaminated emergency abdominal surgeries: a randomized controlled trial

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Versus Traditional Dressings for Low Transverse Abdominal Incisions Healing by Primary Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis