Strangulated Obturator Hernia Diagnosed Preoperatively by Spiral CT: Case Report.
Wang Guan-yu,Qian Hao-ran,Cai Xiao-yan,Fang Song-hua,Shen Lai-gen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00029330-200710020-00027
IF: 6.133
2007-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:Obturator hernia is a relatively rare pelvic hernia and usually occurs in elderly, thin, multiparous women. Because symptoms are nonspecific in most cases, diagnosis is often delayed until laparotomy is performed for treatment of bowel obstruction or peritonitis. Delay in diagnosis and surgical intervention directly contribute to high morbidity and mortality rates.1 Here we report a case of obturator hernia where the diagnosis was made by emergency preoperative abdominal CT scan. CASE REPORT In May 2006, an 85-year-old woman was referred to our emergency department with paroxysmal and cramping abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting for 5 days. The patient had received decompression of the stomach and antibiotic treatment for 2 days in a local hospital, but the symptoms persisted. On physical examination, the abdomen was distended and tympanitic. There was mild tenderness, especially in the right lower quadrant, without guarding. The bowel sounds were hyperactive. No Romberg-Howship sign was present, and no mass was palpated in the bilateral inguinal regions. The patient weighed 35 kg and had congenital scoliolosis. There was no history of previous abdominal surgery. Abdominal roentgenograms in the upright position revealed multiple dilated loops of small intestine with air-fluid levels (Fig. 1). The WBC count was 10.2×109/L with 93.1% neutrophils. Electrolyte and other biochemical studies were within normal limits. Because of unknown causes of intestinal obstruction, an emergency abdominal CT scan was ordered. Since the scan revealed a low-density mass in the right-side obturator canal area, a diagnosis of right obturator hernia was considered (Figs. 2 and 3), and an emergency laparotomy with lower-midline incision was performed. During exploration, a mechanical obstruction of the small intestine was found, and consisted of a 5-cm small intestinal loop incarcerated in the right obturator canal 30 cm proximal to the Bauhin valve. After the portion of incarcerated intestine was reduced from the hernia, a gangrenous change in the middle of the loop with perforation was noted. Therefore, bowel resection and an end-to-end anastomosis was performed. Simple closure of the pelvic orifice of the obturator canal with interrupted sutures was performed. The patient had a postoperative wound infection, and following antibiotic treatment, was discharged on the twentieth postoperative day. No recurrence was present at 5-month follow-up.Fig. 1.: A plain abdominal film in the upright position revealed multiple dilated loops of small intestine with air-fluid levels.Fig. 2.: CT scans demonstrated a low-density mass located between the pectineus and the right external obturator muscles (arrow).Fig. 3.: Multiplanar reconstruction (left: coronal section; right: sagittal section) showed a loop of small intestine protruding into the right side obturator canal area (arrow).DISCUSSION Obturator hernia is relatively rare and is a diagnostic challenge. It occurs through the obturator canal, adjacent to the obturator vessels and nerve, and usually develops because of progressive laxity of the pelvic floor that may be associated with advanced age, emaciation, and increased intraabdominal pressure. It occurs more frequently in woman than in men, partly because of their broader pelvis and larger obturator canal, and may be associated with multiparity.2,3 Our case manifested most of these predisposing factors. The most common clinical presentation of obturator hernia is intestinal obstruction, but this is nonspecific. The Howship-Romberg sign (i.e., pain along the distribution of the obturator nerve caused by compression of the nerve by the hernia sac) is pathognomonic of obturator hernia. Typically, this pain is exacerbated by extension and abduction or inward rotation of the thigh. In most cases, correct preoperative diagnosis is made because of the presence of the Howship-Romberg sign,2 but this sign is present in only 15%-50% of obturator hernia patients.4,5 In the absence of a positive Howship-Romberg sign, an early diagnosis in patients with atypical or ambiguous presentation of obturator hernia is challenging. Because symptoms are nonspecific and specific physical findings are often obscure, diagnosis of obturator hernia is often delayed until laparotomy is performed for treatment of bowel obstruction or peritonitis. Recently, several imaging modalities have been used to establish the diagnosis, including barium enema fluoroscopy, ultrasonography, and herniography. In 1983, computed axial tomography (CAT) of the pelvis was used to diagnose obturator hernia.6 Subsequently, increasing evidence indicates that CT scanning has superior sensitivity and accuracy in the preoperative diagnosis of obturator hernia.7-9 Some authors propose that emergency CT scanning could lead to rapid diagnosis and early surgical intervention, particularly in elderly patients presenting with ileus of unknown origin.7,10 In our case, neither the Howship-Romberg sign nor obviously inguinal palpable mass were noted, and the clinical presentation consisted solely of intestinal obstruction. However, emergency abdominal CT scanning allowed rapid and correct diagnosis, and led to immediate operative intervention. Obturator hernia invariably requires surgical intervention because intestinal occlusion and strangulation often occur. Early diagnosis and surgical treatment are essential to minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with obturator hernia. Currently, there are several ways to repair obturator hernia, including hernia sac ligation only, hernial defect direct closure with interrupted nonabsorbable sutures, mesh repair at laparotomy, and laparoscopic transabdominal or preperitoneal mesh repair.11 In our case, simple closure of the pelvic orifice of the obturator canal with interrupted sutures was performed, and no recurrence was present at follow-up 5 months later.