Evaluating 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab as a PET agent in patients with B-cell lymphoma: a head-to-head comparison with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography
Inki Lee,Byung Hyun Byun,Byung Il Kim,Chang Woon Choi,Hye Jin Kang,Chi Soo Kang,Sang-Keun Woo,Kyo Chul Lee,Joo Hyun Kang,Ilhan Lim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001889
2024-08-19
Abstract:Background: This study aimed to evaluate the biodistribution of 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab and its diagnostic feasibility for lymphoma using CD20-targeted 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab PET/computed tomography (PET/CT). Methods: A prospective study involving six patients diagnosed with lymphoma was conducted between January 2022 and January 2023. These patients underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab PET/CT scans. 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab PET/CT images were acquired at 1, 24, and 48 h after administering 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab to assess the biodistribution and dosimetry over time. The observed lymph nodes were categorized into specific regions, including cervical and supraclavicular, axillary and infraclavicular, mediastinal, hilar, abdominal paraaortic and retroperitoneal, iliac, mesenteric, and inguinal regions, to compare the diagnostic ability of 18F-FDG and 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab PET/CT in detecting lymphoma lesions. Furthermore, the tumor-to-background ratio was calculated and compared with the maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) of the tumors and the mean standardized uptake (SUVmean) of normal organs. Internal radiation dosimetry was determined using the OLINDA/EXM software. Results: 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab uptake in lymph nodes associated with lymphoma progressively increased from 1 to 48 h after injection. In contrast, 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab uptake in normal organs, such as blood, lung, kidney, bladder, muscle, bone, and brain, decreased over time, whereas it increased in the liver and spleen. When it comes to the comparison between 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab and 18F-FDG, the SUVmax of tumors was higher on 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab PET/CT (18.1 ± 8.3) than on 18F-FDG PET/CT (5.2 ± 1.5). Additionally, the tumor-to-background ratio, measured using the SUVmean of normal muscles, was higher on 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab PET/CT (55.7 ± 31.0) than on 18F-FDG PET/CT (8.6 ± 2.8). No adverse events related to 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab injection were reported. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of using 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab PET/CT to evaluate the CD20 expression. The increased 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab uptake in lymph nodes associated with tumors, higher SUVmax, and tumor-to-muscle ratios observed with 64Cu-DOTA-rituximab PET/CT compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT, highlight the diagnostic potential of this imaging modality.