Treatment of thalassemia with hydroxyurea: an indispensable alternative therapy.

A. Kattamis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0B013E3181583B46
2007-11-01
Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology
Abstract:Hemoglobinopathies are among the most frequent monogenic disorders, with the worldwide incidence of carriers being around 7%. b-Thalassemia is very common in many areas of the Middle East and Southeastern Asia. The cost of providing lifelong medical care to the patients with thalassemia according to the standards adopted in the developed countries is extremely high. The burden of thalassemia imposed in the health systems of the developing countries is unbearable, especially as these countries suffer from many other significant public health problems like tuberculosis, HIV, and malaria. Therefore, the fact that the patients with thalassemia in developing countries are undertreated and the disease has been largely ignored by individual governments and local health authorities comes as no surprise. The need for therapeutic interventions alternative to chronic blood transfusion and iron chelation therapy for these patients is urgent. The article by Ansari et al underlines these issues. The trial presented shows the weaknesses of the health care system of developing countries and the struggle of the medical professionals to help their patients under adverse conditions. Few reports on the use of hemoglobin F-augmenting therapies in thalassemia have been published in the last few years. The efficacy of hydroxyurea (HU) in thalassemia intermedia has been documented, while results on its use in thalassemia major have been controversial. HU, an S-phase–specific and non–DNAhypomethylating chemotherapeutic agent, promotes fetal hemoglobin (HbF) production via reactivation of g-globin genes as a result of molecular mechanisms that are not yet fully elucidated. Erythroid cultures from different thalassemia patients in the presence of HU showed variable results, ranging from significant increases in both the number of HbF cells and the HbF content per cell to minimal effect. This variation in response to HU may be due to different genetic factors. In a recent study involving Iranian patients with thalassemia, the response to HU was found to be related to the haplotype of the b-globin gene locus, and more precisely to the type of the b-globin gene mutations and to the XmnI polymorphism. Of note is that in this study, homozygous patients for IVSI-5 (G-C), like the majority of the patients presented by Ansari et al, had a moderate response to the treatment with HU. A similar study from India suggested that the coexistence of deletion on the a-globin gene may positively affect the response to HU. The study by Ansari et al has some weaknesses, with the main being not standard transfusion criteria for the patients throughout their lifetime. It showed an amelioration of symptoms for the patients treated with HU, which was overall modest. Both the clinical status and the hematologic parameters improved in many patients, but they were still significantly inferior what would have been considered optimal in more developed countries. Nevertheless, as appropriate therapy cannot be introduced, this approach may actually be the best available therapeutic strategy for these patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?