Role of diluent on the separation of 90Y from 90Sr by solvent extraction and supported liquid membrane using T2EHDGA as the extractant.

S. Dutta,D. R. Raut,P. Mohapatra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.11.064

IF: 1.787

2012-04-01

Applied Radiation and Isotopes

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comparison of Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block with Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery

Arjun Singh,Nidhi Agrawal,Udismita Baruah,Surabhi Sandill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/mamcjms.mamcjms_16_23

2023-07-21

MAMC Journal of Medical Sciences

Abstract:Background: Patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM) experience acute pain. Inadequate acute postoperative pain control may lead to anxiety, hemodynamic imbalance and development of chronic pain syndrome. Hence analgesia is extremely important for favourable outcome. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) versus ultrasound guided thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with clonidine as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic for post-operative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy. Method: This prospective randomized interventional comparative trial, involving 60 patients were undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer surgery, was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital over 18 months. Sixty patients undergoing MRM for breast cancer under general anaesthesia were enrolled. The patients were randomly allocated into one of the two groups. Group E received ultrasound guided erector spinae block and Group P received Paravertebral block at the level of 4th thoracic vertebra (T4). Both the groups were given 21 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and 1 μg/kg of clonidine diluted in 1 mL of saline (making total volume of up to 22 mL). Primary outcome measure was to compare duration of analgesia, that is from the time of block administration till the time to first rescue analgesia demanded by the patients. Secondary outcome measures were mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score at rest as well as during abduction of ipsilateral arm at various time points, total intraoperative fentanyl and tramadol requirement up to 24 hours postoperatively; postoperative nausea and vomiting; patients satisfaction at the end of 24 hours postoperatively. Statistical method used: Quantitative variables were compared using Independent t-test/Mann-Whitney Test (when the data sets were not normally distributed). Qualitative variables were compared using Chi-Square test /Fisher's exact test.A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Duration of analgesi, that is, time of first rescue analgesia from the administration of the block was comparable between the two study groups. The mean (SD) duration of analgesia in group E was 22.78 (3.31) hours and in group P was 22.88 (3.34) hours ( P = 0.914). Both the groups were comparable in terms of fentanyl requirement and total 24 hours tramadol requirement Other parameters like postoperative nausea vomiting, effect on hemodynamic and overall patient satisfaction were also comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: Both ultrasound guided ESPB and TPVB are equally efficacious in providing postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.
Comparison of continuous erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgaesia in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: A randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

Lovepriya Sharma,Pradeep Bhatia,Sadik Mohammed,Priyanka Sethi,Swati Chhabra,Mritunjay Kumar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_6_22

2023-01-01

Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract:Background and Aims: Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is associated with significant postoperative pain for which many blocks including thoracic paravertebral (TPV) block are being used. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recently described technique. We planned to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided continuous ESP and TPV blocks for postoperative analgaesia following MRM.Methods: Sixty-six patients belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I and II, aged 25-85 years, undergoing MRM were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups. Ipsilateral block was given preoperatively at T3 or T4 level with 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine and 50 μg fentanyl. Infusion of 0.5% and 0.2% ropivacaine with fentanyl 2 μg/ml at a rate of 5 ml/hr was continued during intraoperative and postoperative period, respectively. Pain was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) till 24 hours. Block performance time, time to first rescue analgaesia, total amount of rescue analgaesic consumed, the incidence of procedure-related and postoperative complications, failure rate and patient satisfaction score were also recorded. Data collected were analysed using the Chi-square test or Student's <i>t</i>-test with the help of SPSS 22.0.Results: Demographics, baseline vitals, VAS scores both at rest and on movement, block performance time, time to first rescue analgaesia, the total amount of rescue analgaesia and patient satisfaction score were comparable in both groups (<i>P</i> value > 0.05). No complications were observed in either group.Conclusion: In patients undergoing MRM, continuous catheter technique ESP block is as efficacious and safe as TPV block for providing prolonged postoperative analgaesia.
Comparison Between Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block Regarding Analgesia and Stress Response After Modified Radical Mastectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial

Ahmed Abd Elmohsen Bedewy,Maged Salah Mohamed,Hesham Mohamed Sultan,Moataz Salah Khalil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-142189

2024-03-26

Abstract:Background: Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is the primary surgical treatment for breast cancer, yet it leads to significant postoperative pain. Objectives: This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effects of an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) on post-MRM pain management and stress response reduction. Methods: Sixty individuals scheduled for unilateral MRM under general anesthesia from October 2021 to October 2022 were divided into three groups. Group A comprised 20 patients who received ultrasound-guided ESPB (20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine). Group B included 20 patients who received ultrasound-guided SAPB (20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine). Group C was treated with intravenous morphine based on pain scores. Anesthesia was induced using 2 μg/kg of fentanyl and 2 - 3 mg/kg of propofol. The study compared the three groups regarding pain scores using a numerical rating scale, serum cortisol levels, total fentanyl, and morphine consumption, changes in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) during surgery, and the occurrence of postoperative complications. Results: Statistically significant reductions in pain scores were observed in group A compared to groups B and C. Moreover, group A exhibited a significant decrease in postoperative morphine consumption, serum cortisol levels 1 hour post-surgery (P = 0.021), MAP, and postoperative vomiting and nausea compared to group B. Furthermore, groups A and B showed statistically significant improvements in all parameters compared to group C. Conclusions: The study demonstrates that ESPB provides superior analgesic effects compared to SAPB in patients undergoing MRM, with reduced morphine use and lower postoperative cortisol levels. Both blocks offer more effective pain control than intravenous morphine alone.
Erector spinae plane versus paravertebral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia after breast surgery: a randomized clinical trial

Matthew W Swisher,Anne M Wallace,Jacklynn F Sztain,Engy T Said,Bahareh Khatibi,Maryann Abanobi,John J Finneran,Rodney A Gabriel,Wendy Abramson,Sarah L Blair,Ava Hosseini,Marek K Dobke,Michael C Donohue,Brian M Ilfeld,John J Finneran IV

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2019-101013

2020-01-21

Abstract:Background Paravertebral nerve blocks (PVBs) are frequently used to treat pain during and following breast surgery, but have various undesirable risks such as pneumothorax. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) also provides perioperative breast analgesia, but is purported to be easier to administer with a favorable safety profile. However, it remains unknown if the new ESPB provides comparable analgesia as the decades-old PVB technique. Methods Subjects undergoing unilateral or bilateral non-mastectomy breast surgery were randomized to a single-injection ESPB or PVB in a subject-blinded fashion (ropivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine; 20 mL unilateral or 16 mL/side for bilateral). We hypothesized that (1) analgesia would be non-inferior in the recovery room as measured on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) with ESPB, and (2) opioid consumption would be non-inferior in the operating and recovery rooms with ESPB. Results Both pain scores and opioid consumption were higher in subjects with ESPBs (n=50) than PVBs (n=50; median NRS 3.0 vs 0; 95% CI −3.0 to 0; p=0.0011; and median morphine equivalents 2.0 vs 1.5 mg; 95% CI −1.2 to −0.1; p=0.0043). No block-related adverse events occurred in either group. Conclusions PVBs provided superior analgesia and reduced opioid requirements following non-mastectomy breast surgery. To compare the relatively rare complications between the techniques will require a sample size 1–2 orders of magnitude greater than the current investigation; however, without a dramatic improvement in safety profile for ESPBs, it appears that PVBs are superior to ESPBs for postoperative analgesia after non-mastectomy breast surgery. Trial registration number NCT03549234 .

anesthesiology
Spotlights on Recent JACS Publications.

Wei Chen,P. Zhu,Tewodros Asefa,Xiaoxin Zou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b09218

IF: 15

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract:Wei Chen, Pinwen Zhu, Tewodros Asefa, Xiaoxin Zou, and coworkers report a theoretical and experimental study of a new nonprecious, highly active, and stable electrocatalyst for water splitting (DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b06337). A promising approach to the creation of clean energy involves the production of hydrogen fuel through the electrochemical splitting of water. The so-called hydrogen evolution reaction requires an active and robust catalysta role that has historically been played by highly efficient platinum-based materials. However, the high cost and low Earth abundance of noblemetal-based catalysts limit their widespread use. Thus, scientists have been actively exploring the development of low-cost, nonprecious alternatives, although success has been limited by inefficiency and the inability to operate at the high current densities required for large-scale industrial applications. The electrocatalyst, known as α-MoB2, is a 3D material that is inherently rich in catalytic active sites and possesses metallic properties and high electrical conductivity. The team demonstrates that the material has high catalytic activity, even at large current densities, and is therefore a promising low-cost alternative to traditional catalysts for water splitting. Christine Herman, Ph.D.
Comparison of rhomboid intercostal nerve block, erector spinae plane block and serratus plane block on analgesia for modified radical mastectomy: A prospective randomised controlled trial

Chen‐Wei Jiang,Fen Liu,Qinghe Zhou,Wei Deng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14539

IF: 2.6

2021-07-02

International Journal of Clinical Practice

Abstract:Background and objectivesBreast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors among women. In this study, we compared the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided rhomboid intercostal nerve block, erector spinae plane (ESP) block, and serratus plane block (SAB) after modified radical mastectomy (MRM) of unilateral breast cancer. MethodsThis study involved a double-blind clinical trial that was carried out in the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University on September 23, 2020. The inclusion criteria were the following: the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade needed to be 1–2, the patients needed to be between 18 and 80 years old, and MRM needed to be proposed in our hospital. The exclusion criteria were patients with contraindications related to nerve block. Ninety patients were randomly divided into three groups receiving US-guided SAB, ESP block, and rhomboid intercostal block (RIB). All groups received 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine. Within 24 hours after the operation, the patients received an intravenous injection of tramadol 1–2 mg/kg in the surgical ward for pain relief. ResultsThe dosage of tramadol 24 hours after the operation in the RIB (269.67 ± 48.75 mg) and ESP block groups (273.67 ± 36.90 mg) was significantly lower than that in the SAB group (314.33 ± 18.88 mg) (P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in tramadol consumption between the ESP block and RIB groups within 24 hours (P = 0.676). The numerical rating scale (NRS) scores in the ESP block and RIB groups at 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after the operation once patients were active were significantly lower than that in the SAB group (P < 0.05 for all comparisons); however, the NRS scores of the RIB and ESP block groups did not differ significantly within 24 hours after surgery when patients were active. ConclusionsUS-guided rhomboid intercostal block (US-RIB) and ESP block can effectively reduce the dosage of tramadol within 24 hours after MRM, and they can effectively relieve pain within 24 hours after MRM compared with SAB.

medicine, general & internal
Comparative study between ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery: an equivalence study

Ahmed Anwer Sobhy,Samia Ibrahim Sharaf,Ayman Mokhtar Kamaly,Amr Mohamed Hilal,Farouk Kamal Eldin Abd Elaziz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-023-00339-1

2023-06-05

Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology

Abstract:Abstract Background It is advised to use a regional block to lower postoperative opioid usage. Therefore, we aimed to compare the analgesic effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) on the need for morphine following video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Results The findings revealed that TPVB and ESPB groups were equivalent in analgesic efficacy with postoperative morphine consumption in mg 15.2 ± 2.7 and 14.9 ± 2.4 respectively. statistically significant shorter block time in ESPB was 8.1 ± 1.7 min in contrast to 11.35 ± 1.7 min in TPVB and better patient satisfaction in the ESPB than in TPVB groups ( p value 0.05). There were significantly lower heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) trends in 15 and 30 min intraoperatively ( p value < 0.001) in the TPVB group. Conclusions ESPB has analgesic efficacy equivalent to TPVB from aspects of equivalent postoperative morphine consumption and VAS at rest and during cough with shorter block time and better patient satisfaction. Trial registration Pan African Clinical Trial Registry PACTR202109527452994. Registered on 8 September 2021.
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block to that of the Paravertebral Block in the Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer-A Randomized, Prospective, Single-Blinded Study

Michał But,Krzysztof Wernicki,Jacek Zieliński,Weronika Szczecińska

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164836

2024-08-16

Abstract:Background/Objectives: The paravertebral block (PVB) is a well-studied, effective method of analgesia for breast surgery. Alternative techniques involving the blockage of intercostal nerve branches are the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB). However, no studies comparing both fascial blocks to PVB in breast surgery have been published to date. We evaluated the effectiveness of ESPB and SAPB vs. PVB, expressed as the requirement for intraoperative fentanyl, pain intensity at rest and during coughing, and morphine consumption on the first postoperative day. Additional aims were to perform an evaluation of the safety of the block types used. Materials and Methods: A total of 77 women and 1 man with stage I and II clinical breast cancer, aged 18-85 years, were randomized into one of three study groups: SAPB, PVB, and ESPB. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in fentanyl consumption during surgery with respect to the type of block used (p = 0.4246). Morphine consumption in the postoperative period was highest in the ESPB group, averaging 9.4 mg. There was a statistically significant difference in pain intensity from 4 pm on the day of surgery to 8 am the following morning. No complications related to the blocks were observed on the first postoperative day. Conclusions: Both the serratus anterior plane block and the erector spinae plane block were as effective as the paravertebral block in achieving intraoperative analgesia. The serratus anterior plane block was equally as effective as the paravertebral block in achieving postoperative analgesia. The erector spinae plane block was significantly less effective in achieving postoperative analgesia than both the paravertebral block and serratus anterior plane block.
Comparison of efficacy of erector spinae plane block, thoracic paravertebral block, and erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block combination for acute pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled study.

H. Sazak,G. Ülger,Musa Zengin,R. Baldemir,A. Alagöz,M. Şentürk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16639-3

2022-06-29

Minerva Anestesiologica

Abstract:BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), and ESPB and TPVB combination on acute pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). METHODS Seventy-five patients were evaluated (3 groups (ESPB, TPVB, or combined ESPB-TPVB (Comb-group, each 25 patients). All interventions were performed with the same volume of bupivacaine (20 mL). Primary outcome was VAS (Visual analog scale) during the first 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were postoperative morphine consumption and rescue analgesic requirements. RESULTS VAS during rest and coughing of TPVB was significantly higher compared to other groups (in all measurements compared to Comb-group; and in all but 24 h measurement to ESPB) ESPB and Comb-group had similar VAS in all measurements. (e.g. Median VAS in ESPB, TPVB and Comb-group at 8th hour: 3-4-2 (p=0.014) during coughing and 2-3-1 in rest (p<0.001), respectively). Morphine consumption was statistically significantly higher in TPVB than Comb-group (ESPB: 15.28 mg; TPVB: 19.30 mg; ESPB+TPVB: 10.00 mg) (p: 0.003). Rescue analgesic requirement was statistically significantly higher in the TPVB group than Comb-group (p: 0.009). CONCLUSIONS ESPB alone and the combination of ESPB and TPVB provided superior primary outcomes compared to TPVB alone. Morphine and rescue analgesic consumptions were higher in TPVB than Comb-group. ESPB and Comb-group were statistically similar in terms of primary and secondary outcomes. This study is one of the first studies using the combination of ESBP and TPVB for pain after VATS, and shows the efficacy of this approach.

Medicine
Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Stimulator Guided Pectoral Nerve Block-1 and Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Post-operative Analgesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Devyani J Desai,Velmayil Murugesan Ananda Jyothi,Ruchi Pathak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.56258

2024-03-16

Cureus

Abstract:Background: Breast carcinoma is one of the most common cancers in present-day women worldwide, hence surgical intervention for the same is inevitable. General anesthesia being the preferred technique, the selection of appropriate postoperative pain management is a major concern in which superficial fascial plane chest wall blocks play a pivotal role. We aimed to prove the efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulator-guided pectoral nerve-1 (PEC 1) block and serratus anterior plane (SAP) block for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled clinical study comprised 60 females undergoing modified radical mastectomy and was randomly allocated to two groups. Group A patients received general anesthesia while, in addition to general anesthesia, group B patients received PEC 1 and SAP blocks. Postoperatively the active and passive visual analog score (VAS), duration of analgesia, cumulative requirement of rescue analgesics in the first 24 hours and associated perioperative complications were noted. All quantitative data were analyzed by student t-test and qualitative data by chi-square test using MedCalc software 12.5. Results: VAS score for first 24 hours in group B was lower at rest, on pressure over the surgical site as well as on movements compared with the patients in group A with the p-value being < 0.0001 at all time intervals. Time for receiving first rescue analgesia was shorter (1.25±0.56hour vs 20.05±7.78hour, p<0.001) with the significantly higher requirement of cumulative doses of tramadol in the first 24 hours in patients belonging to group A (233.33±47.95mg vs 110±31.62 mg, p<0.001). Conclusion: PEC 1 and SAP blocks given under peripheral nerve stimulator guidance have a high success rate and are reliable in providing adequate postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.
Analgesic Effectiveness of Preoperative Ultrasound‐Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Paravertebral Nerve Block for Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of Four Randomized Controlled Trials

Wei Chen,Xiaofeng Zhou,Hongmei Li,Boyi Liu,Ling Wang,Tan Liu,Jun Xia,Juying Liu,Xiaofei Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13208

IF: 3.079

2023-01-26

Pain Practice

Abstract:Objective Our meta‐analysis aimed to compare the analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound‐guided preoperative erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus paravertebral nerve block (PVB) in breast surgery. Methods PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between January 1, 1980 and April 31, 2021 . The primary endpoints were perioperative pain score, analgesic consumption and assessment of block procedure. The secondary endpoints were intraoperative haemodynamic response, duration of surgery, postoperative antiemetic consumption and adverse effects. Results Four RCTs comprised of a total of 310 patients were included in our meta‐analysis. No significant differences in the perioperative pain score and analgesic consumption were observed between ESPB and PVB in the operating room, post‐anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and ward (at 1, 16, 12, and 24 hour, and the morning of postoperative day 1 (POD1) (all P > 0.05). Similarly, no significant differences in the duration of block, time to first analgesic, haemodynamic response, duration of surgery, postoperative antiemetic consumption and adverse effects were observed (all P > 0.05). However, our meta‐analysis revealed that ultrasound‐guided preoperative ESPB significantly reduced the duration of procedure time and frequency of guidance interventions, as well as increasing the block success rate among residents (all P < 0.05). Conclusions Both ultrasound‐guided preoperative ESPB and PVB showed comparable analgesic effects in patients undergoing breast surgery. However, with a significantly shorter procedure time and higher block success rate, our findings suggest that ESPB may be a simple alternative to PVB in breast surgery.

clinical neurology,anesthesiology
A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Total Abdominal Hysterectomy under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Control Study

Ratan Lal Yadav,Veena Patodi,Suneel Ganganna Ampragundi,Kavita Jain,Arvind Khare,Veena Mathur

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_20_23

2024-01-01

Indian Journal of Pain

Abstract:Abstract Background: Postoperative discomfort after a total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) is severe. The Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is the latest addition to the multimodal pain management regimen, providing both visceral and somatic analgesia. Aim: The aim of this study was assessed the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB for TAH. Materials and Methods: 70 female patients aged 40 to 60 years, American society of anaesthesiology (ASA) physical status class I and II posted for TAH were enrolled. Group ESPB+SA( n =35) received bilateral ESPB using 0.25% ropivacaine hydrochloride 15ml with 0.5μ/kg dexmedetomidine on each side before spinal anaesthesia, while group SA ( n =35) received only spinal anaesthesia. Postoperative follow-up for 24 hours.Statistical analysis used: Independent-samples student t-test. Results: The total dose of tramadol injection consumed in the first 24 hours postoperatively in group ESPB+SA was significantly low (110.34mg) as compared to group SA (334.29mg) ( P < 0.001). Time for first rescue analgesia was prolonged significantly in group ESPB+SA while it was very short in Group SA( P < 0.001). Postoperatively the mean modified defense and veterans pain rating scale (DVPRS) for pain was lower in group ESPB+SA than in group SA, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). Similarly, scores for other modified DVPRS components, such as sleep, activity, mood and stress were lower in the ESPB+SA group. Conclusions: Bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB prior to spinal anaesthesia offers effective and prolonged postoperative analgesia, with significantly lower postoperative tramadol use and a higher satisfaction score in patients undergoing TAH under spinal anaesthesia.
Efficacy of bi-level erector spinae plane block versus bi-level thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomized comparative study

Domenico P. Santonastaso,Annabella de Chiara,Roberto Righetti,Diego Marandola,Andrea Sica,Claude T. Bagaphou,Chiara Rosato,Andrea Tognù,Annalisa Curcio,Leonardo Lucchi,Emanuele Russo,Vanni Agnoletti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02157-2

IF: 2.376

2023-06-17

BMC Anesthesiology

Abstract:Postoperative analgesia in breast surgery is difficult due to the extensive nature of the surgery and the complex innervation of the breast; general anesthesia can be associated with regional anesthesia techniques to control intra- and post-postoperative pain.

anesthesiology
A Prospective Study Comparing Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block

Marco Micali,Giada Cucciolini,Giulia Bertoni,Michela Gandini,Marco Lattuada,Gregorio Santori,Carlo Introini,Francesco Corradi,Claudia Brusasco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020383

IF: 3.9

2024-01-11

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Regional anesthesia in postoperative pain management has developed in recent years, especially with the advent of fascial plane blocks. This study aims to compare the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus the ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) on postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic or robotic urologic surgery. This was a prospective observational study; 97 patients (ESPB-group) received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% plus 0.5 mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine in each side at the level of T7–T9 and 93 patients (TAPB-group) received bilateral ultrasound-guided TAPB with 20 mL ropivacaine 0.375% or 0.25%. The primary outcome was the postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, which was significantly lower in the ESPB group on postoperative days 0, 1, 2, and 3 (p < 0.001) and, consequently, the number of patients requiring postoperative supplemental analgesic rescue therapies was significantly lower (p < 0.001). Concerning the secondary outcomes, consumption of ropivacaine was significantly lower in the group (p 0.001). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the TAPB group and no block-related complications were observed. Our data indicate that ESPB provides postoperative pain control at least as good as TAPB plus morphine, with less local anesthetic needed.

medicine, general & internal
The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Combined with Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Xunxun Wang,Guo Ran,Xia Chen,Cuiyu Xie,Jing Wang,Xuesheng Liu,Yao Lu,Weiping Fang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-020-00234-9

IF: 3.96

2021-01-21

Pain and Therapy

Abstract:IntroductionOne of the most common malignancies in women worldwide is breast cancer. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can reduce pain after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. The duration of nerve block analgesia is limited if local anesthetic agents are used alone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia during a single injection of local anesthetics.MethodsIn this double-blind, randomized study, 60 female American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–II patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomized into two groups: ultrasound (US)-guided ESPB with 30 mL of 0.33% ropivacaine (group R) and US-guided ESPB with 30 mL of dexmedetomidine plus 0.33% ropivacaine (group DR). US-guided ESPB at the T3 vertebral level was performed preoperatively in all patients. The indicators were 1-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 48-h visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores after surgery in the resting state and at 90-degree shoulder abduction. Other measures were a comparison of intraoperative sufentanil and remifentanil, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), flurbiprofen consumption, the lengths of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and hospital stay, postoperative bradycardia, and hypotension.ResultsThe VAS pain score was lower in group DR than group R at any time in the resting state, except at 1 h after surgery. The VAS pain score was lower in group DR than group R at 12 and 24 h in an active state after surgery (P < 0.05 for each time interval). The intraoperative dosages of remifentanil and sufentanil in group DR were lower than that in group R. The postoperative dosage of flurbiprofen in group DR was lower than that in group R (P = 0.038). The lengths of PACU stay were longer in group DR than in group R. No significant difference was found in PONV and hospital stay between the two groups. No sinus bradycardia or hypotension after surgery occurred in the two groups.ConclusionsDexmedetomidine as an adjunctive to ESPB can effectively relieve pain and significantly reduce the need for opioids during modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.Trial RegistrationThe study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000031134, principal investigator: Yao Lu, date of registration: 2020-3-22).

clinical neurology
Paravertebral and erector spinae plane blocks decrease length of stay compared with local infiltration analgesia in autologous breast reconstruction

Haripriya S Ayyala,Melissa Assel,Joseph Aloise,Joanna Serafin,Kay See Tan,Meghana Mehta,Vinay Puttanniah,Patrick McCormick,Vivek Malhotra,Andrew Vickers,Evan Matros,Emily Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-105031

2024-02-08

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

Abstract:Background Autologous breast reconstruction is associated with significant pain impeding early recovery. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of replacing surgeon-administered local infiltration with preoperative paravertebral (PVB) and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks for latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap reconstruction. Methods Patients who underwent mastectomy with latissimus flap reconstruction from 2018 to 2022 were included in three groups: local infiltration, PVB, and ESP blocks. Block effect on postoperative length of stay (LOS) and the association between block status and pain, opioid consumption, time to first analgesic, and postoperative antiemetic administration were assessed. Results 122 patients met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective cohort study: no block (n=72), PVB (n=26), and ESP (n=24). On adjusted analysis, those who received a PVB block had a 20-hour shorter postoperative stay (95% CI 11 to 30; p<0.001); those who received ESP had a 24-hour (95% CI 15 to 34; p<0.001) shorter postoperative stay compared with the no block group, respectively. Using either block was associated with a reduction in intraoperative opioids (23 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)), 95% CI 14 to 31, p<0.001; ESP versus no block: 23 MME, 95% CI 14 to 32, p<0.001). Conclusions Replacing surgical infiltration with PVB and ESP blocks for autologous breast reconstruction reduces LOS. The comparable reduction in LOS suggests that ESP may be a viable alternative to PVB in patients undergoing latissimus flap breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Further research should investigate whether ESP or PVB have better patient outcomes in complex breast reconstruction.

anesthesiology
Interpectoral and Pectoserratus Plane Block vs. Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Partial Mastectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Patryk Eisler,Stephan Zimmermann,Ragnar Henningsson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9989997

2024-03-20

Pain Research and Management

Abstract:Background. Patients undergoing breast surgery are at risk of severe postoperative pain. Several opioid-sparing strategies exist to alleviate this condition. Regional anesthesia has long been a part of perioperative pain management for these patients. Aim. This randomized study examined the benefits of interpectoral and pectoserratus plane block (IPP/PSP), also known as pectoralis nerve plain block, compared with advanced local anesthetic infiltration. Methods. We analyzed 57 patients undergoing partial mastectomy with sentinel node dissection. They received either an ultrasound-guided IPP/PSP block performed preoperatively by an anesthetist or local anesthetic infiltration performed by the surgeon before and during the surgery. Results. Pain measured with the numerical rating scale (NRS) indicated no statistically significant difference between the groups (IPP/PSP 1.67 vs. infiltration 1.97; p value 0.578). Intraoperative use of fentanyl was significantly lower in the IPP/PSP group (0.18 mg vs 0.21 mg; p value 0.041). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of stay in the PACU (166 min vs 175 min; p value 0.51). There were no differences in reported postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) between the groups. The difference in postoperative use of oxycodone in the PACU ( p value 0.7) and the use of oxycodone within 24 hours postoperatively ( p value 0.87) was not statistically significant. Conclusions. Our study showed decreased intraoperative opioid use in the IPP/PSP group and no difference in postoperative pain scores up to 24 hours. Both groups reported low postoperative pain scores. This trial is registered with NCT04824599.

clinical neurology
The analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block in thoracic surgeries: a meta-analysis

Efrem Fenta,Simegnew Kibret,Metages Hunie,Tadese Tamire,Getachew Mekete,Abebe Tiruneh,Yewlsew Fentie,Kaletsidik Dessalegn,Diriba Teshome

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1208325

IF: 3.9

2023-08-17

Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract:Background Acute postoperative pain after thoracic surgery might lead to chronic postsurgical pain (PSP), which lowers quality of life. The literature suggests thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) as a pain management approach. The ESPB (erector spinae plane block) is regarded to be an effective PVB alternative. The analgesic efficacy of the two analgesic therapies is controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of ESPB and PVB in preventing acute PSP. Methods We searched relevant articles in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score, with secondary outcomes including analgesic consumption, the frequency of rescue analgesia, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results This meta-analysis included ten RCTs with a total of 670 patients. PVB significantly lowered the pain scores at movement at 12 h following surgery as compared to the ESPB. The PVB group used much less opioids within 24 h after surgery compared to the ESPB group. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of postoperative rescue analgesia or in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting ( p > 0.05). Conclusion PVB produced superior analgesia than ESPB in patients who underwent thoracic surgeries. In addition, PVB demonstrated greater opioid sparing effect by consuming much less opioids. Systematic review registration This trial is registered on PROSPERO , number CRD42023412159.

medicine, general & internal
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: Study Protocol of a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Non-Inferiority Design Trial

Zhen-Zhen Xu,Xue Li,Zhen Zhang,Zheng-Ye Liu,Lin-Lin Song,Xue-Ying Li,Hong Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05173-0

IF: 2.728

2021-01-01

Trials

Abstract:Introduction: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel inter-fascial plane block, which is applied more and more in postoperative pain control, especially in chest surgery. Regional block is advocated in order to decrease opioid consumption and improve analgesia in urological surgery. Therefore, we aimed to explore whether ESPB would have similar analgesia compared with thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. Methods and analysis: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, non-inferiority trial will enroll 166 patients undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 into receiving ESPB or TPVB before surgery. Both ultrasound-guided ESPB and TPVB will be performed with an injection of 0.375% ropivacaine 0.4 ml/kg before anesthesia induction. Standardized patients controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) will be applied for each patient. The primary endpoint is the joint of cumulative 24 h opioid (sufentanil) consumption and average pain score via numeric rating scale (NRS) at 24 h after surgery. Secondary endpoints include rescued analgesic demand, cumulative opioid consumption, and pain NRS scores at different preset timepoints within 48 h after surgery. Other predefined outcomes include clinical features of blockage, quality of recovery, subjective sleep quality, time to ambulation and diet, and adverse events, as well as length of stay in hospital and anesthesia cost. Discussion: Previous studies investigating the analgesic efficacy of ESPB only concentrated on a single endpoint for postoperative pain evaluation, while studies focusing on the direct comparison between ESPB and TPVB in urological surgery are still lacking. Our study is the first trial in non-inferiority design of comparing ESPB and TPVB in patient undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and the primary outcome is the joint endpoint of opioid consumption and pain NRS score.
In-situ combination of fermentation and electrodialysis with bipolar membranes for the production of lactic acid: continuous operation.

Xiaolin Wang,Yaoming Wang,Xu Zhang,Hongyan Feng,T. Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.045

IF: 11.4

2013-11-01

Bioresource Technology

Abstract:

Role of diluent on the separation of 90Y from 90Sr by solvent extraction and supported liquid membrane using T2EHDGA as the extractant.

Comparison of Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block with Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery

Comparison of continuous erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgaesia in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: A randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

Comparison Between Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block Regarding Analgesia and Stress Response After Modified Radical Mastectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial

Erector spinae plane versus paravertebral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia after breast surgery: a randomized clinical trial

Spotlights on Recent JACS Publications.

Comparison of rhomboid intercostal nerve block, erector spinae plane block and serratus plane block on analgesia for modified radical mastectomy: A prospective randomised controlled trial

Comparative study between ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery: an equivalence study

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block to that of the Paravertebral Block in the Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer-A Randomized, Prospective, Single-Blinded Study

Comparison of efficacy of erector spinae plane block, thoracic paravertebral block, and erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block combination for acute pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled study.

Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Stimulator Guided Pectoral Nerve Block-1 and Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Post-operative Analgesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Analgesic Effectiveness of Preoperative Ultrasound‐Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Paravertebral Nerve Block for Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of Four Randomized Controlled Trials

A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Total Abdominal Hysterectomy under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Control Study

Efficacy of bi-level erector spinae plane block versus bi-level thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomized comparative study

A Prospective Study Comparing Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block

The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Combined with Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Paravertebral and erector spinae plane blocks decrease length of stay compared with local infiltration analgesia in autologous breast reconstruction

Interpectoral and Pectoserratus Plane Block vs. Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Partial Mastectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial

The analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block in thoracic surgeries: a meta-analysis

Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: Study Protocol of a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Non-Inferiority Design Trial

In-situ combination of fermentation and electrodialysis with bipolar membranes for the production of lactic acid: continuous operation.