Interfacial and foaming properties of plant and microbial proteins: Comparison of structure-function behavior of different proteins

Xinyu Zhang,Zhe Liu,Xiaojie Ma,Yicheng Zheng,Hui Hu,Bo Jiao,David Julian McClements,Qiang Wang,Aimin Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141431
2025-01-15
Abstract:Many plant proteins are amphiphilic molecules that can adsorb to air-water interfaces and form protective coatings around gas bubbles. In this study, the composition, structure, physicochemical properties, air-water interfacial properties, and foaming properties of 16 plant and microbial proteins were characterized. We found a correlation between the composition, structure, physicochemical properties, and foaming properties of the proteins. The foaming capacity of them showed a highly significant positive correlation (p ≤ 0.01) with their foaming stability, α-helix content, surface hydrophobicity, and free sulfhydryl content. The foaming capacity and foaming stability showed highly significant negative correlations with disulfide bond content (p ≤ 0.01). We found wheat gluten protein (WGP) and mung bean protein (MBP) had higher foaming capacity (102.67 ± 8.08 % and 89.33 ± 4.72 %), which could be attributed to higher surface hydrophobicity (179.68 ± 1.40 and 130.28 ± 1.41) and larger contact angle (82.369 ± 0.016° and 82.949 ± 0.228°).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?