Abstract:Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has garnered significant interest for its potential to enhance cognitive functions and as a therapeutic intervention in various cognitive disorders. However, the clinical application of tDCS has been hampered by significant variability in its cognitive outcomes. Furthermore, the widespread use of tDCS has raised concerns regarding its safety and efficacy, particularly due to our limited understanding of its underlying neural mechanisms at the cellular level. We still do not know 'where', 'when', and 'how' tDCS modulates information encoding by neurons, to lead to the observed changes in cognitive functions. Without elucidating these fundamental unknowns, the root causes of its outcome variability and long-term safety remain elusive, challenging the effective application of tDCS in clinical settings. Addressing this gap, our study investigates the effects of tDCS, applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), on cognitive abilities and individual neuron activity in macaque monkeys performing cognitive tasks. Like humans performing a Delayed Match-to-Sample task, monkeys exhibited practice-related slowing in their responses (within-session behavioural adaptation). Concurrently, there were practice-related changes in simultaneously recorded activity of prefrontal neurons (within-session neuronal adaptation). Anodal tDCS attenuated both these behavioural and neuronal adaptations when compared to sham. Furthermore, tDCS abolished the correlation between monkeys' response time and neuronal firing rate. At a single-cell level, we also found that following tDCS, neuronal firing rate was more likely to exhibit task-specific modulation than after sham stimulation. These tDCS-induced changes in both behaviour and neuronal activity persisted even after the end of tDCS stimulation. Importantly, multiple applications of tDCS did not alter burst-like firing rates of individual neurons when compared to sham stimulation. This suggests that tDCS modulates neural activity without enhancing susceptibility to epileptiform activity, confirming a potential for safe use in clinical settings. Our research contributes unprecedented insights into the 'where', 'when', and 'how' of tDCS effects on neuronal activity and cognitive functions by showing that modulation of monkeys' behaviour by the tDCS of the prefrontal cortex is accompanied by alterations in prefrontal cortical cell activity ('where') during distinct trial phases ('when'). Importantly, tDCS led to task-specific and state-dependent alterations in prefrontal cell activities ('how'). Our findings suggest a significant shift from the view that the tDCS effects are merely due to polarity-specific shifts in cortical excitability and instead, propose a more complex mechanism of action for tDCS that encompasses various aspects of cortical neuronal activity without increasing burst-like epileptiform susceptibility.

tDCS and local scalp cooling do not change corticomotor and intracortical excitability in healthy humans

Investigating the Working Mechanism of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study

Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans

Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients

No Immediate Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities on Cerebral Blood Flow in People with Multiple Sclerosis

Tracking the Effect of Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cortical Excitability and Connectivity by Means of TMS-EEG

Non-Dominant Hemisphere Excitability Is Unaffected during and after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dominant Hemisphere

Small effects of electric field on motor cortical excitability following anodal tDCS

The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal and cortico-cortical excitability and response variability: conventional versus high-definition montages

A direct comparison of the electrophysiological effects of transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation in healthy subjects

The effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation intensity on motor performance in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial

Short periods of bipolar anodal TDCS induce no instantaneous dose-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow in the targeted human motor cortex

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions

Metaplastic neuromodulation via transcranial direct current stimulation has no effect on corticospinal excitability and neuromuscular fatigue

Direct current stimulation modulates prefrontal cell activity and behaviour without inducing seizure-like firing

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left prefrontal cortex does not affect time-trial self-paced cycling performance: Evidence from oscillatory brain activity and power output

Reinterpreting published tDCS results in terms of a cranial and cervical nerve co-stimulation mechanism

Transspinal Direct Current Electrical Stimulation Selectively Affects the Excitability of the Corticospinal System, Depending on the Intensity but Not Motor Skills

Physiology of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Does Cathodal Preconditioning Enhance the Effects of Subsequent Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Grip Strength?