Abstract:Most of our knowledge about human emotional memory comes from animal research. Based on this work, the amygdala is often labeled the brain's "fear center", but it is unclear to what degree neural circuitries underlying fear and extinction learning are conserved across species. Neuroimaging studies in humans yield conflicting findings, with many studies failing to show amygdala activation in response to learned threat. Such null findings are often treated as resulting from MRI-specific problems related to measuring deep brain structures. Here we test this assumption in a mega-analysis of three studies on fear acquisition (n = 98; 68 female) and extinction learning (n = 79; 53 female). The conditioning procedure involved the presentation of two pictures of faces and two pictures of houses: one of each pair was followed by an electric shock [a conditioned stimulus (CS+)], the other one was never followed by a shock (CS-), and participants were instructed to learn these contingencies. Results revealed widespread responses to the CS+ compared with the CS- in the fear network, including anterior insula, midcingulate cortex, thalamus, and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, but not the amygdala, which actually responded stronger to the CS- Results were independent of spatial smoothing, and of individual differences in trait anxiety and conditioned pupil responses. In contrast, robust amygdala activation distinguished faces from houses, refuting the idea that a poor signal could account for the absence of effects. Moving forward, we suggest that, apart from imaging larger samples at higher resolution, alternative statistical approaches may be used to identify cross-species similarities in fear and extinction learning.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The science of emotional memory provides the foundation of numerous theories on psychopathology, including stress and anxiety disorders. This field relies heavily on animal research, which suggests a central role of the amygdala in fear learning and memory. However, this finding is not strongly corroborated by neuroimaging evidence in humans, and null findings are too easily explained away by methodological limitations inherent to imaging deep brain structures. In a large nonclinical sample, we find widespread BOLD activation in response to learned fear, but not in the amygdala. A poor signal could not account for the absence of effects. While these findings do not disprove the involvement of the amygdala in human fear learning, they challenge its typical portrayals and illustrate the complexities of translational science.

Fear, learning, and the amygdala: a personal reflection in honor of Joseph LeDoux

On role models and Joe LeDoux

Joseph E. LeDoux

A Neuroscientist’s Perspective on Debates about the Nature of Emotion

Coming to terms with fear

Contributions of the Amygdala to Emotion Processing: From Animal Models to Human Behavior

Extending insights from LeDoux: using movies to study subjective, clinically meaningful experiences in neuroscience

The enduring legacy of pioneering neuroscientist Dr. Jerzy Edwin Rose

Using Neuroscience to Help Understand Fear and Anxiety: A Two-System Framework.

Reflections on a Career in Pediatric Neuropathology, with a Note of Gratitude

Robust BOLD Responses to Faces But Not to Conditioned Threat: Challenging the Amygdala's Reputation in Human Fear and Extinction Learning

Gateway to the study of the amygdala and emotion

Neural and cellular mechanisms of fear and extinction memory formation

The birth, death and resurrection of avoidance: a reconceptualization of a troubled paradigm

Memories of 100 years of human fear conditioning research and expectations for its future

Prefrontal–Amygdala Pathways for Object and Social Value Representation

How can ethology inform the neuroscience of fear, aggression and dominance?

How to interpret LeDoux's multistate hierarchical theory of consciousness

Fear processing and social networking in the absence of a functional amygdala

Neuroimmunology, women scientists and dogma