Family-clinician shared decision making in intensive care units: Cluster randomized trial in China
Xinchun Liu,Gerald Humphris,Aijing Luo,Mingshi Yang,Jin Yan,Shaohua Huang,Siyu Xiao,Ailian Lv,Guobao Wu,Peigen Gui,Qingyan Wang,Yudong Zhang,Yaxin Yan,Nie Jing,Jie Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.004
IF: 3.467
2021-10-01
Patient Education and Counseling
Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate if a Family-Clinician Shared Decision-Making (FCSDM) intervention benefits patients, families and intensive care units (ICUs) clinicians.MethodsSix ICUs in China were allocated to intervention or usual care. 548 patients with critical illness, 548 family members and 387 ICU clinicians were included into the study. Structured FCSDM family meetings were held in the intervention group. Scales of SSDM, HADS, QoL2 and CSACD were used to assess families' satisfaction and distress, patients' quality of life, and clinicians' collaboration respectively.ResultsComparing the intervention group with the control group at post-intervention, there were significant differences in the families' satisfaction (P = 0.0001), depression level (P = 0.005), and patients' quality of life (P = 0.0007). The clinicians' mean CSCAD score was more positive in the intervention group than controls (P < 0.05). There was no significant between-group differences on ICU daily medical cost, but the intervention group demonstrated shorter number of days' stay in ICU (P = 0.0004).ConclusionThe FCSDM intervention improved families' satisfaction and depression, shortened patients' duration of ICU stay, and enhanced ICU clinicians' collaboration.Practice implicationsFurther improvement and promotion of the FCSDM model are needed to provide more evidence to this field in China.
public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, interdisciplinary