Sociodemographic factors and dog ownership practices that perpetuate the roaming of owned dogs in selected urban and rural settings in Uganda

Dickson Stuart Tayebwa,Colin Ssekandi,Sylvia Nalubwama,Rogers Dankaine,Isa Lutebemberwa,Njalira Kassim Rashid,Mariam Komugisha,Kelvin Bwambale,Hannington Katumba,John Katerega,Denis Muhangi,Savino Biryomumaisho,Robert Tweyongyere,James Okwee Acai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2024.2411553
2024-10-09
Abstract:We analyzed dog care practices among 1,006 owners in urban and rural areas in Uganda to identify the root causes of roaming. The dog owners were mostly male, aged 20-39 years, and low-income earners. Each household in urban areas had an average of 2.36 dogs (SD 3.35), and 2.35 dogs (SD 2.18) in rural areas. We determined that 16.1% of urban dogs and 29.4% of rural dogs roamed during the day, with numbers rising to 26.0% and 65.2% at night (p < 0.001), due to dogs being released at night for security purposes. Key drivers of roaming included inadequate confinement, particularly the lack of a secure enclosure around homes, underfeeding and abandonment. These issues were linked to poverty, low education and poor attitudes. Our findings provide a foundation for developing tailored strategies to control free-roaming dogs (FRD) in Uganda. Short-term solutions include implementing fines for owners who allow their dogs to roam, subsidized dog sterilization, and public education programs. Long-term strategies should involve policies on dog ownership, registration, breeding, and research to develop evidence-based control measures for FRD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?