Abstract:As machine learning (ML) usage becomes more popular in the healthcare sector, there are also increasing concerns about potential biases and risks such as privacy. One countermeasure is to use federated learning (FL) to support collaborative learning without the need for patient data sharing across different organizations. However, the inherent heterogeneity of data distributions among participating FL parties poses challenges for exploring group fairness in FL. While personalization within FL can handle performance degradation caused by data heterogeneity, its influence on group fairness is not fully investigated. Therefore, the primary focus of this study is to rigorously assess the impact of personalized FL on group fairness in the healthcare domain, offering a comprehensive understanding of how personalized FL affects group fairness in clinical outcomes. We conduct an empirical analysis using two prominent real-world Electronic Health Records (EHR) datasets, namely eICU and MIMIC-IV. Our methodology involves a thorough comparison between personalized FL and two baselines: standalone training, where models are developed independently without FL collaboration, and standard FL, which aims to learn a global model via the FedAvg algorithm. We adopt Ditto as our personalized FL approach, which enables each client in FL to develop its own personalized model through multi-task learning. Our assessment is achieved through a series of evaluations, comparing the predictive performance (i.e., AUROC and AUPRC) and fairness gaps (i.e., EOPP, EOD, and DP) of these methods. Personalized FL demonstrates superior predictive accuracy and fairness over standalone training across both datasets. Nevertheless, in comparison with standard FL, personalized FL shows improved predictive accuracy but does not consistently offer better fairness outcomes. For instance, in the 24-h in-hospital mortality prediction task, personalized FL achieves an average EOD of 27.4% across racial groups in the eICU dataset and 47.8% in MIMIC-IV. In comparison, standard FL records a better EOD of 26.2% for eICU and 42.0% for MIMIC-IV, while standalone training yields significantly worse EOD of 69.4% and 54.7% on these datasets, respectively. Our analysis reveals that personalized FL has the potential to enhance fairness in comparison to standalone training, yet it does not consistently ensure fairness improvements compared to standard FL. Our findings also show that while personalization can improve fairness for more biased hospitals (i.e., hospitals having larger fairness gaps in standalone training), it can exacerbate fairness issues for less biased ones. These insights suggest that the integration of personalized FL with additional strategic designs could be key to simultaneously boosting prediction accuracy and reducing fairness disparities. The findings and opportunities outlined in this paper can inform the research agenda for future studies, to overcome the limitations and further advance health equity research.

PPFL: A personalized progressive federated learning method for leveraging different healthcare institution-specific features

An Efficient Digital Twin Assisted Clustered Federated Learning Algorithm for Disease Prediction.

Personalized Retrogress-Resilient Framework for Real-World Medical Federated Learning

Personalized Retrogress-Resilient Federated Learning Toward Imbalanced Medical Data

PPFL: A Personalized Federated Learning Framework for Heterogeneous Population

Personalized Federated Learning with Adaptive Batchnorm for Healthcare

Analyzing the Impact of Personalization on Fairness in Federated Learning for Healthcare

Privacy-preserving patient clustering for personalized federated learning

A Comprehensive View of Personalized Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Clinical Datasets

Sparse Federated Learning with Hierarchical Personalized Models

Advances in Privacy Preserving Federated Learning to Realize a Truly Learning Healthcare System

Efficient Personalized Federated Learning on Selective Model Training

Group Personalized Federated Learning

Personalized Federated Learning with Adaptive Feature Aggregation and Knowledge Transfer

Adaptive Personlization in Federated Learning for Highly Non-i.i.d. Data

GPFL: Simultaneously Learning Global and Personalized Feature Information for Personalized Federated Learning

Multi-level Personalized Federated Learning on Heterogeneous and Long-Tailed Data

FedMetaMed: Federated Meta-Learning for Personalized Medication in Distributed Healthcare Systems

Personalized Privacy-Preserving Framework for Cross-Silo Federated Learning

A comparison between centralized and asynchronous federated learning approaches for survival outcome prediction using clinical and PET data from non-small cell lung cancer patients

MetaFed: Federated Learning Among Federations With Cyclic Knowledge Distillation for Personalized Healthcare