Abstract:BackgroundStepped wedge trials (SWTs) can be considered as a variant of a clustered randomised trial, although in many ways they embed additional complications from the point of view of statistical design and analysis. While the literature is rich for standard parallel or clustered randomised clinical trials (CRTs), it is much less so for SWTs. The specific features of SWTs need to be addressed properly in the sample size calculations to ensure valid estimates of the intervention effect.MethodsWe critically review the available literature on analytical methods to perform sample size and power calculations in a SWT. In particular, we highlight the specific assumptions underlying currently used methods and comment on their validity and potential for extensions. Finally, we propose the use of simulation-based methods to overcome some of the limitations of analytical formulae. We performed a simulation exercise in which we compared simulation-based sample size computations with analytical methods and assessed the impact of varying the basic parameters to the resulting sample size/power, in the case of continuous and binary outcomes and assuming both cross-sectional data and the closed cohort design.ResultsWe compared the sample size requirements for a SWT in comparison to CRTs based on comparable number of measurements in each cluster. In line with the existing literature, we found that when the level of correlation within the clusters is relatively high (for example, greater than 0.1), the SWT requires a smaller number of clusters. For low values of the intracluster correlation, the two designs produce more similar requirements in terms of total number of clusters. We validated our simulation-based approach and compared the results of sample size calculations to analytical methods; the simulation-based procedures perform well, producing results that are extremely similar to the analytical methods. We found that usually the SWT is relatively insensitive to variations in the intracluster correlation, and that failure to account for a potential time effect will artificially and grossly overestimate the power of a study.ConclusionsWe provide a framework for handling the sample size and power calculations of a SWT and suggest that simulation-based procedures may be more effective, especially in dealing with the specific features of the study at hand. In selected situations and depending on the level of intracluster correlation and the cluster size, SWTs may be more efficient than comparable CRTs. However, the decision about the design to be implemented will be based on a wide range of considerations, including the cost associated with the number of clusters, number of measurements and the trial duration.

The I2 Test for Selection Bias Risk Assessment in Single Trials: Recommended Simulated Comparator Trial (SCT) Settings

A Test Method for Identifying Selection Bias Risk in Prospective Controlled Clinical Therapy Trials Using the I2 Point Estimate

Selection Induced Contrast Estimate (SICE) Effect: An Attempt to Quantify the Impact of Some Patient Selection Criteria in Randomized Clinical Trials

Adjustment of selection bias for clinical trials: a simulation study

Comparison of the power and type 1 error of total score models for drug effect detection in clinical trials

BASIC: A Bayesian Adaptive Synthetic-Control Design for Phase II Clinical Trials.

Controlling the type I error rate in two-stage sequential adaptive designs when testing for average bioequivalence

Detecting critical treatment effect bias in small subgroups

A Novel Statistical Test for Treatment Differences in Clinical Trials using a Response Adaptive Forward Looking Gittins Index Rule

Matching-adjusted Indirect Comparisons: A Simulation Study of Statistical Performance

Comparing type 1 and type 2 error rates of different tests for heterogeneous treatment effects

Comparing analytical strategies for balancing site-level characteristics in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: a simulation study

Exploring Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials When Some of the Patients are Treated against the Randomization

Information-adaptive clinical trials with selective recruitment and binary outcomes

Enhancing Statistical Validity and Power in Hybrid Controlled Trials: A Randomization Inference Approach with Conformal Selective Borrowing

Are the tests overpowered or underpowered? A unified solution to correctly specify type I errors in design of clinical trials for two sample proportions

Applying the estimands framework to non-inferiority trials: guidance on choice of hypothetical estimands for non-adherence and comparison of estimation methods

Semi-Parametric Sensitivity Analysis for Trials with Irregular and Informative Assessment Times

A novel statistical method for comparing effectiveness of two treatments-simulated randomized controlled trials

Sample size calculation for a stepped wedge trial

Optimization the Design of Fixed and Group Sequential Three-Arm Non-Inferiority Trials with Dichotomous Endpoints of Risk Difference and Odds Ratio