Abstract:Background: Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is a widespread disease, with radiotherapy being a core treatment modality. Manual segmentation of the primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) is currently employed for OPC radiotherapy planning, but is subject to significant interobserver variability. Deep learning (DL) approaches have shown promise in automating GTVp segmentation, but comparative (auto)confidence metrics of these models predictions has not been well-explored. Quantifying instance-specific DL model uncertainty is crucial to improving clinician trust and facilitating broad clinical implementation. Therefore, in this study, probabilistic DL models for GTVp auto-segmentation were developed using large-scale PET/CT datasets, and various uncertainty auto-estimation methods were systematically investigated and benchmarked. Methods: We utilized the publicly available 2021 HECKTOR Challenge training dataset with 224 co-registered PET/CT scans of OPC patients with corresponding GTVp segmentations as a development set. A separate set of 67 co-registered PET/CT scans of OPC patients with corresponding GTVp segmentations was used for external validation. Two approximate Bayesian deep learning methods, the MC Dropout Ensemble and Deep Ensemble, both with five submodels, were evaluated for GTVp segmentation and uncertainty performance. The segmentation performance was evaluated using the volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance (MSD), and Hausdorff distance at 95% (95HD). The uncertainty was evaluated using four measures from literature: coefficient of variation (CV), structure expected entropy, structure predictive entropy, and structure mutual information, and additionally with our novel Dice-risk measure. The utility of uncertainty information was evaluated with the accuracy of uncertainty-based segmentation performance prediction using the Accuracy vs Uncertainty (AvU) metric, and by examining the linear correlation between uncertainty estimates and DSC. In addition, batch-based and instance-based referral processes were examined, where the patients with high uncertainty were rejected from the set. In the batch referral process, the area under the referral curve with DSC (R-DSC AUC) was used for evaluation, whereas in the instance referral process, the DSC at various uncertainty thresholds were examined. Results: Both models behaved similarly in terms of the segmentation performance and uncertainty estimation. Specifically, the MC Dropout Ensemble had 0.776 DSC, 1.703 mm MSD, and 5.385 mm 95HD. The Deep Ensemble had 0.767 DSC, 1.717 mm MSD, and 5.477 mm 95HD. The uncertainty measure with the highest DSC correlation was structure predictive entropy with correlation coefficients of 0.699 and 0.692 for the MC Dropout Ensemble and the Deep Ensemble, respectively. The highest AvU value was 0.866 for both models. The best performing uncertainty measure for both models was the CV which had R-DSC AUC of 0.783 and 0.782 for the MC Dropout Ensemble and Deep Ensemble, respectively. With referring patients based on uncertainty thresholds from 0.85 validation DSC for all uncertainty measures, on average the DSC improved from the full dataset by 4.7% and 5.0% while referring 21.8% and 22% patients for MC Dropout Ensemble and Deep Ensemble, respectively. Conclusion: We found that many of the investigated methods provide overall similar but distinct utility in terms of predicting segmentation quality and referral performance. These findings are a critical first-step towards more widespread implementation of uncertainty quantification in OPC GTVp segmentation.

Estimating Uncertainty of Geographic Atrophy Segmentations with Bayesian Deep Learning

Exploiting Epistemic Uncertainty of Anatomy Segmentation for Anomaly Detection in Retinal OCT

Improving Interpretability in Machine Diagnosis Detection of Geographic Atrophy in OCT Scans

A Deep Learning Model for Segmentation of Geographic Atrophy to Study Its Long-Term Natural History

Joint Segmentation and Uncertainty Visualization of Retinal Layers in Optical Coherence Tomography Images using Bayesian Deep Learning

Automated Geographic Atrophy Segmentation for SD-OCT Images Using Region-Based C-V Model Via Local Similarity Factor.

Quantifying Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparative Analysis Across 12 Deep Learning Models

Beyond Retinal Layers: A Deep Voting Model for Automated Geographic Atrophy Segmentation in SD-OCT Images

A Multi-Scale Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Joint Segmentation and Prediction of Geographic Atrophy in SD-OCT Images

Segmentation of Bruch's Membrane in retinal OCT with AMD using anatomical priors and uncertainty quantification

Application of simultaneous uncertainty quantification for image segmentation with probabilistic deep learning: Performance benchmarking of oropharyngeal cancer target delineation as a use-case

Automated and Robust Geographic Atrophy Segmentation for Time Series SD-OCT Images.

Semi-automatic Geographic Atrophy Segmentation for SD-OCT Images.

An Integrated Time Adaptive Geographic Atrophy Prediction Model for SD-OCT Images.

Validation of a deep learning model for automatic detection and quantification of five OCT critical retinal features associated with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

U2-Net: A Bayesian U-Net model with epistemic uncertainty feedback for photoreceptor layer segmentation in pathological OCT scans

Fully Automated Prediction of Geographic Atrophy Growth Using Quantitative Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers.

Automated segmentation of macular edema for the diagnosis of ocular disease using deep learning method

Automated Segmentation of Choroidal Neovascularization on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Images of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients Based on Deep Learning

Give me (un)certainty -- An exploration of parameters that affect segmentation uncertainty

Geographic Atrophy Segmentation in SD-OCT Images Using Synthesized Fundus Autofluorescence Imaging.