[SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE TREATMENT OF MYCOSES WITH GRISEOFULVIN].

G. Năstase,M. Munteanu,M. Ilieș,I. Boros

1964-04-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Post-Discharge Oral Nutritional Supplements With Dietary Advice In Patients At Nutritional Risk After Surgery For Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Qingyang Meng,Shanjun Tan,Yi Jiang,Jun Han,Qiulei Xi,Qiulin Zhuang,Guohao Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2020.04.043

IF: 7.643

2021-01-01

Clinical Nutrition

Abstract:Background & aims: Malnutrition frequently occurs and deteriorates in patients after surgery for gastric cancer, especially after hospital discharge, which has been consistently associated with negative outcomes. However, information regarding the impact of post-discharge nutritional interventions is poorly described. The aim of this study was thus to evaluate the impact of post-discharge oral nutritional supplements (ONS) with dietary advice compared with dietary advice alone on nutritional outcomes, including body mass index (BMI) and skeletal muscle index (SMI), sarcopenia prevalence, chemotherapy tolerance, the 90-day readmission rate, and quality of life in patients at nutritional risk after surgery for gastric cancer.Methods: Three hundred and fifty-three patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer and were at nutritional risk (Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 [NRS 2002] score >= 3 points) in our institution were randomly assigned to receive either ONS with dietary advice or dietary advice alone (control) for 3 months after discharge. The primary endpoints were nutritional outcomes and sarcopenia prevalence; the secondary endpoints included chemotherapy tolerance, the 90-day readmission rate, and quality of life.Results: Three hundred and thirty-seven patients completed the study and were included in the analyses, consisting of 171 in the ONS group and 166 in the control group. The average daily intake of ONS in the intervention group was 370 mL. After 3 months of the intervention, the patients who received ONS and dietary advice had significantly less weight loss and higher BMI and SMI than those given dietary advice alone (P < 0.05). The incidence of sarcopenia was significantly lower in the ONS group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Similar number of patients in the two groups underwent postoperative chemotherapy, but the patients who received ONS and dietary advice had significantly less chemotherapy modifications, including delay, dose reduction, or termination (P < 0.05). The two groups had no significant differences in the 90-day readmission rate (P > 0.05). Regarding the quality of life, the patients who received ONS and dietary advice reported significantly less fatigue and appetite loss than those given dietary advice alone (P < 0.05), but the two groups showed no significant differences in the other outcomes (P > 0.05).Conclusions: Post-discharge ONS with dietary advice in patients at nutritional risk after surgery for gastric cancer improved nutritional outcomes, skeletal muscle maintenance, chemotherapy tolerance and some quality of life variables. These findings strongly support the concept of the introduction of post-discharge ONS with dietary advice to this patient cohort. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
Effects of different postoperative nutritional support on oxidative stress and clinical outcomes for patients after gastrointestinal surgery

YAO Yushi,WANG Lei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-3594.2011.09.015

2011-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effect of different postoperative nutritional support on oxidative stress and clinical outcomes for patients after gastrointestinal surgery.Methods Sixty patients undergoing gastrointestinal neoplasm radical surgery were randomly divided into two groups:parenteral nutrition(PN) group and parenteral nutrition combined with enteral nutrition(PN + EN) group,30 cases in each group.Basic conditions,nutrition status,oxidative stress indices and clinical outcomes were compared.Results BMI in both groups was significantly decreased one week after surgery(P<0.05 ).There was no significant difference in concentrations of ALB and PA between the two groups after operation.The concentration of HGB and lymphocytes in the PN group was significantly decreased one week after surgery(P<0.05) while the concentration of HGB in the PN + EN group was not significantly different but lymphocytes were significantly increased(P<0.05).SOD activities were significantly increased in both groups one week after surgery(P<0.05).GSH activity in the PN group was significantly decreased(P<0.05);but was significantly increased in the PN + EN group(P<0.05).MDA content in the TPN group was significantly increased one week after surgery(P<0.05 ),but decreased significantly in the PN + EN group(P<0.05).The recovery time of anal passing flatus,postoperative hospital stay and cost of nutrition treatment in the PN + EN group patients were well below those in the PN group(P<0.05).The complication rate was decreased compared with the PN group,though not significantly(P>0.05).Conclusions PN + EN improves the ability against the postoperative oxidative stress and clinical outcomes,so it can be the first choice for nutritional support in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.
Impact of Oral Nutritional Supplements in Post-Discharge Patients at Nutritional Risk Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Shanjun Tan,Qingyang Meng,Yi Jiang,Qiulin Zhuang,Qiulei Xi,Jiahao Xu,Jinou Zhao,Xiangyu Sui,Guohao Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2020.05.038

IF: 7.643

2021-01-01

Clinical Nutrition

Abstract:Background & aims: Guidelines on clinical nutrition recommend the use of appropriate nutritional support therapy for surgical cancer patients at risk of malnutrition both during hospital care and following discharge from the hospital. However, previous studies regarding nutritional interventions have mainly focused on patients during their hospital stay; there is limited evidence supporting the recommendation of nutritional interventions for post-discharge patients after cancer surgery, particularly those who underwent gastrointestinal cancer surgery and at high risk of malnutrition. To clearly address this issue, we designed and conducted two independent studies on two different groups of post-discharge patients at nutritional risk after gastrointestinal cancer surgery. The present study aimed to assess the impact of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in post-discharge patients at nutritional risk following colorectal cancer surgery. Meanwhile, the sister study on the use of ONS in post-discharge patients following gastric cancer surgery will be reported separately. Methods: Between January 2017 and June 2019, post-discharge patients following colorectal cancer surgery in our institution were randomised to receive either dietary advice alone (control group) or dietary advice in combination with ONS (ONS group) for three months if they were at nutritional risk based on the tool of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. The primary endpoints were nutritional outcomes and sarcopenia prevalence. The secondary endpoints were 90-day readmission rate, chemotherapy tolerance, and quality of life (QoL). Results: Of the 232 eligible patients, 212 (107 in the control group and 105 in the ONS group) completed the trial. Their data were then analyzed. The mean ONS intake was 410 mL every day. By the three-month intervention, the skeletal muscle index in the ONS group was significantly higher than that in the control group (39.75 +/- 5.83 vs 38.01 +/- 6.18 cm(2)/m(2), P = 0.037), but no significant differences between the two groups were noted in weight, weight loss, body mass index, serum albumin and hemoglobin (P > 0.05). In addition, the ONS group had a significantly lower sarcopenia prevalence (28.6% vs 42.1%, P = 0.040). No significant difference between the two groups was found in the 90-day readmission rate (P > 0.05). The number of patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy in the two groups was similar, but chemotherapy modifications, such as delay, dose reduction, or termination, were significantly reduced in the ONS group (21.2% vs 36.8%, P=0.024). However, ONS had no significant effect on QoL (P > 0.05). Conclusions: In post-discharge patients at nutritional risk following colorectal cancer surgery, the use of ONS may reduce skeletal muscle loss and sarcopenia prevalence, as well as improve chemotherapy tolerance, compared with dietary advice alone. These findings underline the importance of ONS treatment in post-discharge patients at nutritional risk following colorectal cancer surgery. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
The efficacy of simple oral nutritional supplements versus usual care in postoperative patients with gastric cancer: study protocol for a multicenter, open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial

Kohei Ueno,Tatsuto Nishigori,Yukinari Tokoro,Akiyoshi Nakakura,Shigeru Tsunoda,Shigeo Hisamori,Kyoichi Hashimoto,Seiichiro Kanaya,Kenjiro Hirai,Eiji Tanaka,Hiroaki Hata,Dai Manaka,Masazumi Sakaguchi,Masato Kondo,Takatsugu Kan,Atsushi Itami,Akira Miki,Yuichiro Kawamura,Kosuke Toda,Hiroshi Okabe,Michihiro Yamamoto,Yoshito Yamashita,Yosuke Kinjo,Hironori Kawada,Kazutaka Obama,Kyoto Esophageal, Gastric Cancer Surgery Group (KEGG)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08169-8

IF: 2.728

2024-07-03

Trials

Abstract:Background: Body weight loss (BWL) after gastrectomy impact on the short- and long-term outcomes. Oral nutritional supplement (ONS) has potential to prevent BWL in patients after gastrectomy. However, there is no consistent evidence supporting the beneficial effects of ONS on BWL, muscle strength and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ONS formulated primarily with carbohydrate and protein on BWL, muscle strength, and HRQoL. Methods: This will be a multicenter, open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial in patients with gastric cancer who will undergo gastrectomy. A total of 120 patients who will undergo gastrectomy will be randomly assigned to the ONS group or usual care (control) group in a 1:1 ratio. The stratification factors will be the clinical stage (I or ≥ II) and surgical procedures (total gastrectomy or other procedure). In the ONS group, the patients will receive 400 kcal (400 ml)/day of ONS from postoperative day 5 to 7, and the intervention will continue postoperatively for 8 weeks. The control group patients will be given a regular diet. The primary outcome will be the percentage of BWL (%BWL) from baseline to 8 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes will be muscle strength (handgrip strength), HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-OG25, EQ-5D-5L), nutritional status (hemoglobin, lymphocyte count, albumin), and dietary intake. All analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Discussion: This study will provide evidence showing whether or not ONS with simple nutritional ingredients can improve patient adherence and HRQoL by reducing BWL after gastrectomy. If supported by the study results, nutritional support with simple nutrients will be recommended to patients after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Trial registration: jRCTs051230012; Japan Registry of Clinical Trails. Registered on Apr. 13, 2023.
Effect of Oral Nutritional Supplementation on the Post-Discharge Nutritional Status and Quality of Life of Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients after Surgery: a Multi-Center Study.

Ming-Wei Zhu,Xin Yang,Dian-Rong Xiu,Yong Yang,Guo-Xin Li,Wei-Guo Hu,Zhi-Gang Wang,Hong-Yuan Cui,Jun-Min Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.201909_28(3).0004

2019-01-01

Abstract:Background and Objectives: To evaluate the effect of oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) on the post-discharge nutritional status and quality of life (QoL) of gastrointestinal cancer patients after surgery. Methods and Study Design: A multi-center study was conducted on gastrointestinal cancer patients who received surgical treatment from 2013-2015. All patients were screened using the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) to assess nutritional risk. Patients with nutritional risk were randomized into two groups: patients in the study group (n=55) were given dietary guidance and ONS, control group (n=59) received only dietary guidance. Anthropometric measurements, nutrition-related laboratory tests, and gastrointestinal function scores were also collected and analyzed using Student's t test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). In addition, the EQ-5D was used to evaluate patients' QoL. Results: Compared with baseline measurements, the body weight of patients in the study group increased by 1.35 +/- 0.53 kg and 1.35 +/- 0.73 kg at 60 and 90 days, which were significantly higher than those in the control group (-1.01 +/- 0.54 kg, and -1.60 +/- 0.81 kg at 60 and 90 days). The results from ANOVA showed that only weight and BMI differed significantly between the study and control groups and also between different measurement times (p<0.01). No differences were found for the other indicators or QoL between the study groups. Conclusions: ONS may improve the weight and BMI of surgically treated gastrointestinal cancer patients post-discharge. However, these effects had little impact on patients' QoL.
Research with adolescents: parental involvement required?

A. Holder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JADOHEALTH.2007.10.014

IF: 7.898

Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract:
Effects of oral nutritional supplements on body weight and life qualityin post-discharge patients with gastricor colorectal cancer: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

Yi Jiang,Qingyang Meng,Shanjun Tan,Qi Zhang,Zhenghong Yu,Xinping Zhang,Guohao Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-635X.2019.05.002

2019-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) on body weight loss and life quality in post-discharge patients with gastric and colorectal cancer. Methods All the enrolled post-operative gastric or colorectal cancer patients were randomly divided into ONS group and control group. Body weight loss, middle arm circumference, triceps skinfold thickness and right-hand grip strength were measured and the Karnofsky score, ECOG score and QOL score were calculated 3 months after the discharge. ResultsThe body weight loss of gastric cancer patients was lower in ONS group than in control group since 2 months after discharge. (2 months after discharge: 1. 65±2. 11vs. 2. 70±1. 90 kg, t = -2. 3853, P = 0. 0193; 3 months after discharge: 1. 95±2. 75vs. 3. 67±2. 29 kg, t = -3. 1347, P = 0. 0024), There was no difference of body weight loss between two groups in colorectal cancer patients. The middle arm circumference, triceps skinfold thicknessand right-hand grip strength showed no statistic difference between two groups both in gastric and colorectal cancer patients. The Karnofsky score (56. 82±13. 65％vs. 51. 71± 9. 72％, t = 2. 0148, P = 0. 0472) and QOL score (41. 91±6. 92 vs. 38. 39±8. 77, t = 2. 0597, P = 0. 0426) were higher in ONS group than in control group in gastric cancer patients. While all 3 types of scores had no difference between two groups in colorectal cancer patients. Conclusion ONS can efficiently reduce the body weight loss and improve the performance status and life qualityin post-discharge gastric cancer patients, but not in colorectal cancer patients.
Current status of perioperative nutritional intervention and exercise in gastric cancer surgery: A review

Satoshi Ida,Koshi Kumagai,Souya Nunobe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12520

2021-10-26

Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery

Abstract:Patients with gastric cancer are often malnourished or sarcopenic during tumor progression. Perioperative malnutrition, including sarcopenia, is strongly related to postoperative complications and long-term outcomes. To improve outcomes, nutritional intervention is common for patients with gastric cancer, especially for those undergoing elective surgery. Several clinical trials evaluating perioperative nutritional intervention have set postoperative loss of body weight and lean body mass as endpoints; however, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, recently, perioperative multimodal interventions that are expected to have a synergistic effect between nutritional intervention and exercise have gained attention. Furthermore, supplementing with leucine, a branched-chain amino acid, in addition to exercise, may be promising for preventing perioperative sarcopenia. However, whether perioperative nutritional intervention and exercise has clinical benefits in gastric surgery is unclear. With the aging of gastric cancer patients, measures to address sarcopenia will become more important in the future. Understanding the significance of nutritional intervention and exercise in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery will help achieve good outcomes.

gastroenterology & hepatology
Loss of Body Weight and Skeletal Muscle Negatively Affect Postoperative Outcomes after Major Abdominal Surgery in Geriatric Patients with Cancer.

Junjie Wang,Qiulin Zhuang,Shanjun Tan,Jiahao Xu,Yanni Zhang,Mingyue Yan,Shuhao Li,Zhige Zhang,Guohao Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2022.111907

IF: 4.893

2023-01-01

Nutrition

Abstract:Objectives: Malnutrition characterized by the involuntary loss of body weight and skeletal muscle can be the result of both aging and malignancy. As a result, geriatric patients could face an increased nutritional risk. This study aimed to investigate the nutritional and functional status of geriatric patients and their association with postoperative complications. Methods: Patients who underwent abdominal surgery for digestive cancer in our center between January 2020 and August 2021 were included in the study. Computed tomography scans were collected to evaluate muscle mass and density. Changes in body weight, muscle strength, physical performances, nutritional risk, and status were evaluated upon admission. Postoperative outcomes collected included postoperative length of stay, complications, and 30-d readmission. Results: A total of 1513 patients were included for the analysis. Of these, 72.8% were at risk for malnutrition (70.3% in the non-geriatric group and 75.4% in the geriatric group; P = 0.031), and 28.9% had malnutrition according to the Subjective Global Assessment (26.0% in the non-geriatric group and 31.8% in the geriatric group; P = 0.016). Compared with younger patients, geriatric patients have decreased muscle mass (skeletal muscle index, 44.8 versus 47.4; P < 0.001) and skeletal muscle density. Significant weight loss and loss of skeletal muscle occurred concurrently in 18.8% of the patients and were more frequent in the geriatric group (22.3% versus 14.7%; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, an age of 65 y or older (odds ratio [OR], 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.86; P = 0.014), a serum albumin level < 4.11 g/dL (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.03-1.77; P = 0.03), skeletal muscle loss (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.28-2.24; P < 0.001), declined functional status (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.14-1.98; P = 0.004), systematic inflammation (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.09-2.8; P = 0.026), and significant weight loss (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.06-2.85; P = 0.017) were independent predictors of overall postop-erative complications. Although there was a trend of interactions between advanced age, skeletal muscle loss, and significant weight loss, multivariate analysis showed none of the interactions were significantly pre-dictive of overall postoperative complications. Conclusions: Geriatric patients are at greater risk for malnutrition. Their declined nutritional and functional status together with advanced age could increase the risk for postoperative complications. Nutrition evalua-tion should be part of the preoperative workup, and timely interventions should be initiated if needed, espe-cially in geriatric patients. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Gastrointestinal cancer surgery in the elderly: The effects of preoperative oral nutritional supplements - A retrospective study

Shu-An Wang,Jingyue Gu,Xiaotian Chen,Jiayao Yang,Yan Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202412_33(4).0013

Abstract:Background and objectives: The current study aimed to explore the effect of nutritional prehabilitation on the clinical prognosis of elderly patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery. Methods and study design: A retrospective study was conducted, where participants were divided into two groups based on whether they received oral nutritional supplementation at the first outpatient visit. The nutritional prehabilitation group (n=41) adopted a nutritional prehabilitation mode (a standard energy intake of 25-30 kcal/kg· d was recommended). While the control group (n=55) received routine care. All patients underwent laparoscopic surgery according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Changes in nutritional status, complications, psychological status, symptoms, hospitalization days, and expenditures were compared between the two groups. Results: Both groups of patients experienced weight loss. However, the decline in body weight in the prehabilitation group was less than that in the control group (-1.88 vs. -2.56 kg, p < 0.001). In the comparison of nutritional prehabilitation group and control group, significant improvements were observed in the Hospital Anxiety Scale scores (5 vs. 5, p = 0.01) and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory scores (3 vs. 0, p < 0.001) respectively. The infection rate in the nutritional prehabilitation group was lower than that in the control group (17.1% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.04). Additionally, patients in the nutritional prehabilitation group had significantly fewer hospitalization days at discharge (14.3 vs. 17.1 days, p = 0.03). Conclusions: In elderly patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery, a nutritional prehabilitation model may help maintain better physical and mental status, reduce infection rates, and shorten hospitalization days.
The loss of body weight and skeletal muscle negatively affect postoperative outcomes after major abdominal surgery in geriatric cancer patients

Junjie Wang,Qiulin Zhuang,Shanjun Tan,Jiahao Xu,Yanni Zhang,Mingyue Yan,Shuhao Li,Zhige Zhang,Guohao Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2022.111907

IF: 4.893

2022-11-04

Nutrition

Abstract:Background & aims Malnutrition characterized by the involuntary loss of body weight and skeletal muscle can be the result of both aging and malignancy. As a result, geriatric patients could face an increased nutritional risk. This study is to investigate the nutritional and functional status of geriatric patients and their association with postoperative complications. Methods Patients who underwent abdominal surgery for digestive cancer in our center were included between January 2020 and August 2021. Computed tomography scans (CT) were collected to evaluate muscle mass and density. Change in body weight, muscle strength, physical performances, nutritional risk, and status were evaluated upon admission. Postoperative outcomes collected included postoperative length of stay, complications, and 30-day readmission. Results A total of 1513 patients were included for the analysis. 72.8% of the patients were at risk for malnutrition (70.3% in nongeriatric group and 75.4% in geriatric group, p = 0.031). 28.9% of the patients had malnutrition according to Subjective Global Assessment (26.0% in nongeriatric group and 31.8% in geriatric group, p = 0.016 ). Compared to younger patients, geriatric patients have decreased muscle mass (Skeletal muscle index: 44.8 v.s 47.4, p < 0.001 ) and skeletal muscle density. Significant weight loss and loss of skeletal muscle occurred concurrently in 18.8% of the patients, and was more frequent in the geriatric group (22.3% v.s 14.7%, p < 0.001 ). In multivariate analysis, age at or over 65 (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.07-1.86, p = 0.014 ), serum albumin level ≤4.11 g/dL (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03-1.77, p = 0.03 ), skeletal muscle loss (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.28-2.24, p < 0.001 ), declined functional status (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.14-1.98, p = 0.004 ), systematic inflammation (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.09-2.8, p = 0.026 ), and significant weight loss (OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.06-2.85, p = 0.017 ) were independent predictors of overall postoperative complications. Although there was a trend of interactions between advanced age, skeletal muscle loss and significant weight loss, multivariate analysis showed none of the interactions were significantly predictive of overall postoperative complications. Conclusions Geriatric patients are at greater risk for malnutrition. Their declined nutritional and functional status together with advanced age could increase the risk for postoperative complications. Nutrition evaluation should be part of the preoperative workups and timely interventions should be initiated if needed, especially in geriatric patients.

nutrition & dietetics
Sarcopenia is associated with severe postoperative complications in elderly gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy

Kazuyoshi Yamamoto,Kazuhiro Nishikawa,Motohiro Hirao,Yasunari Fukuda,Tamaki Nakayama,Yukiko Nagatsuma,Sugano Tanigawa,Sakae Maeda,Naotsugu Haraguchi,Masakazu Miyake,Naoki Hama,Atsushi Miyamoto,Hideyasu Omiya,Masataka Ikeda,Koji Takami,Shoji Nakamori,Mitsugu Sekimoto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11638/jssmn.49.1_35

2015-01-01

The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION

Abstract:Sarcopenia is defined as the attenuation of muscle mass and strength that is associated with aging. Sarcopenia is one of the causes of frailty; it is associated with impaired activity of daily life, fracture and poor treatment outcome of various cancers. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of sarcopenia among elderly gastric cancer patients and the impact on postoperative complications. Of 69 elderly ( ≥ 65 years old) gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy between July 2012 and February 2014 in our institute, 38 patients (55.1%) were diagnosed with sarcopenia, based on the criteria proposed by European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP). Sarcopenic patients were significantly older (77 vs. 73 years old, p=0.025) and had a lower Body Mass Index (BMI) (20.4 vs. 23.5 kg/m2, p=0.0016), compared to non-sarcopenic patients. In terms of preoperative nutritional intake assessed by a national registered dietitian in our institute using Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), calories and protein of food intake in sarcopenic patients were significantly smaller than that in non-sarcopenic patients [25.6 vs. 29.9 kcal/(IBW)kg, p=0.0060 and 0.95 vs. 1.12 g/(IBW)kg, p=0.0041, respectively]. The incidence of severe postoperative complications greater than Grade Ⅲ a, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification was greater in sarcopenic patients (23.7 vs. 6.5%, p=0.043) and sarcopenia was identified as an independent risk factor of severe complications after gastrectomy from Logistic multivariate regression analysis (odds ratio 5.86, 95% confidence interval 1.06.51.65, p=0.042). Optimal nutritional support has a possible role to improve the short-term treatment outcome after gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients.
Effects of postoperative oral elemental nutritional supplement on skeletal muscle loss after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Kazuhiro Nishikawa,Yutaka Kimura,Kentaro Kishi,Kentaro Inoue,Jin Matsuyama,Yusuke Akamaru,Shigeyuki Tamura,Junji Kawada,Tomono Kawase,Ryohei Kawabata,Yoshiyuki Fujiwara,Hitoshi Kanno,Takeshi Yamada,Toshio Shimokawa,Hiroshi Imamura

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-023-02462-3

2024-01-17

International Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:We previously showed that daily nutritional intervention with an oral elemental diet (ED) at 300 kcal/day for 6–8 weeks postoperatively decreased the percentage of body weight loss (%BWL), and that the effect was maintained for 1 year. This post hoc analysis aimed to determine whether this intervention decreased skeletal muscle mass loss 1-year post-gastrectomy.

oncology
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Nutritional Status Between Early and Late Oral Feeding After Esophagectomy

Kwon Joong Na,Chang Hyun Kang,Young Ran Kim,Mi Jin Kang,Eun Hwa Song,Eun Joo Jang,Samina Park,Hyun Joo Lee,In Kyu Park,Young Tae Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006441

IF: 13.787

2024-07-12

Annals of Surgery

Abstract:Objective: To compare nutritional and postoperative outcomes between early oral feeding and late oral feeding with jejunostomy feeding support after esophagectomy. Summary Background Data: Esophagectomy is associated with substantial body weight loss and malnutrition, impacting the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients. Despite many studies on post-esophagectomy nutritional support, optimal strategies remain elusive. This study investigates the impact of jejunostomy feeding with late oral feeding compared to conventional oral feeding on nutritional and postoperative outcomes. Methods: We performed a single-center prospective open-labelled randomized controlled trial between 2020 and 2022. Patients aged 18 to 75 years with resectable esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to undergo either early oral feeding (early group) or late oral feeding with jejunostomy feeding support (late group) after esophagectomy. The primary endpoint was body weight loss from preoperative body weight at postoperative 4-5 weeks and 4 months. Other perioperative and nutritional outcomes were also evaluated. Results: We randomly assigned 29 patients to the early group and 29 patients to the late group. The late group exhibited significantly less body weight loss at both postoperative 4-5 weeks (8.3% vs. 5.6%; P =0.002) and 4 months (15.0% vs. 10.5%; P =0.003). The total calorie intake and protein intake were higher in the late group for both postoperative 4-5 weeks (1800 kcal/day vs. 1100 kcal/day; P <0.001) and 4 months (1565 kcal/day vs. 1200 kcal/day; P =0.010). Sixty percentage of early group changed to malnutrition state, while 40% of the late group changed to malnutrition. The complication rate and length of hospital stays were similar. Conclusions: The late group demonstrated prevention of significant body weight loss, enhanced nutritional intake, and reduces malnutrition without compromising short-term surgical outcomes.

surgery
[Effect of an Oral Nutritional Supplementation on Nutritional Status and Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Multi-Center Prospective Randomized Control Trial].

X Yang,M W Zhu,D R Xiu,Y Yang,G X Yang,W G Hu,Z G Wang,H Y Cui,J M Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190724-00287

2020-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the effect of oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) on the nutritional status and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-TRC-13003798). A multi-center randomized controlled trial was conducted. Colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and had nutritional risk (nutrition risk screening 2002 score ≥3) when discharge from hospital in six hospitals (Beijing Hospital, Peking University Third Hospital, Guangzhou Nanfang Hospital, Shanghai Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, and Shanghai The Sixth People's Hospital) from June 2013 to August 2015 were prospectively enrolled. These patients were randomly divided into the ONS group and control group. Patients in the ONS group received dietary guidance and oral nutritional supplements (2092 kJ/day, whole protein enteral nutrition) for 90 days after discharge from hospital, while patients in the control group only received dietary guidance. Anthropometric measurements (body weight, body mass index [BMI], upper arm circumference, gripping power of the dominant hand, triceps skin fold), nutrition-related laboratory tests (hemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin, total cholesterol, triglyceride), gastrointestinal function scores and quality of life (evaluated by EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire) were collected and compared at baseline (at discharge), and at 30-day, 60-day and 90-day after discharge. Results: A total of 90 patients were included into this multi-center study, of whom 5 patients dropped out, 43 patients were assigned to the ONS group and 42 patients to the control group. Compared with baseline, the body weight of patients in the ONS group increased by (1.523±0.525) kg at 60-day and (1.967±0.661) kg at 90-day, which were significantly higher than those of patients in the control group [60-day: (-0.325±0.518) kg, P=0.015; 90-day: (-0.224±0.705) kg, P=0.027, respectively]. A similar pattern was observed for BMI, the ONS group increased by (0.552±0.203) kg/m(2) at 60-day and (0.765±0.205) kg/m(2) at 90-day, which were significantly higher than those of patients in control group [60-day: (-0.067±0.202) kg/m(2), P=0.034; 90-day: (0.022±0.210) kg/m(2), P=0.013]. No significant differences of other anthropometric measurements and nutrition-related laboratory tests were found between the two groups (all P>0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences of improvement in gastrointestinal function and quality of life between two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Oral nutritional supplements can improve the body weight and BMI of colorectal cancer patients with nutritional risk receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, though it does not improve the quality of life.
The Effect of Nutrition Intervention With Oral Nutritional Supplements on Ovarian Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

Nan Qin,Guichun Jiang,Xu Zhang,Di Sun,Meishuo Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.685967

IF: 5

2021-06-25

Frontiers in Nutrition

Abstract:Background: Ovarian cancer is the third most common gynecological malignancy in the world and it is under a higher incidence of malnutrition. Chemotherapy is currently a common treatment for ovarian cancer, but the resulting side effects can exacerbate malnutrition. Our aim was to investigate the beneficial effects of oral nutrition supplements (ONS) on ovarian cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: Single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients with ovarian cancer receiving chemotherapy were randomly assigned either to the ONS or non-ONS groups via a simple randomization. The ONS group was given 250 mL ONS each time (1.06 kcal, 0.0356 g of protein per mL), three times a day, and nutrition education. Control group received nutrition education alone. The primary outcome was the nutritional risk of the patients as assessed by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). The secondary outcome was the results of the participants' biochemical tests at each measurement time point. Data were collected (T0) at baseline, (T1) post intervention at 3 weeks, (T2) 9-week follow-up, (T3) 15-week follow-up. Generalized estimating equation models were used to compare the changes in outcomes over time between groups. Results: 60 participants (30 ONS, 30 controls) completed the trial, and data was analyzed. For baseline comparisons, no significant differences were found between the two groups. A progressive trend toward amelioration in PG-SGA scores over time was found within the ONS group, with scores decreasing from 9.27 ± 1.68 at baseline (T0) to 5.87 ± 2.06 after the intervention (T3). Furthermore, ONS group achieved a significantly greater reduction in PG-SGA score at the T1 ( p = 0.03, confidence interval −2.23 to −0.11), T2 ( p = 0.001, confidence interval −2.86 to −0.74) and T3 ( p < 0.001, confidence interval −3.81 to −1.53), than the control group. In terms of biochemical test results, patients in the ONS group had better leukocytes, lymphocytes, Hemoglobin, Albumin and Total Protein than the control group at different time points, with statistical differences between the two groups ( p < 0.05). Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that ONS can significantly reduce the nutritional risk of patients undergoing chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. In addition, we also found that nutritional education seems to have a positive effect on reducing the nutritional risk of patients especially at the beginning of chemotherapy.

nutrition & dietetics
Effects of Preoperative Oral Nutritional Supplements on Improving Postoperative Early Enteral Feeding Intolerance and Short-Term Prognosis for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Single-Center, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Feng-Jun He,Mo-Jin Wang,Kun Yang,Xiao-Long Chen,Tao Jin,Li-Li Zhu,Wen Zhuang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14071472

IF: 5.9

2022-04-01

Nutrients

Abstract:Background: Early enteral nutrition (EN) after abdominal surgery can improve the prognosis of patients. However, the high feeding intolerance (FI) rate is the primary factor impeding postoperative EN. Methods: Sixty-seven patients who underwent radical subtotal or total gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) were randomly allocated to the preoperative oral nutritional supplement group (ONS group) or dietary advice alone (DA group). Both groups were fed via nasojejunal tubes (NJs) from the first day after surgery to the fifth day. The primary endpoint is the FI rate. Results: Of the patients, 66 completed the trial (31 in the ONS group, 35 in the DA group). The FI rate in the ONS group was lower than that in the DA group (25.8% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.249). The postoperative five-day 50% energy compliance rate in the ONS group was higher than that in the DA group (54.8% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.465). The main gastrointestinal intolerance symptoms were distension (ONS vs. DA: 45.2% vs. 62.9, p = 0.150) and abdominal pain (ONS vs. DA: 29.0% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.226). Postoperative nausea/vomiting rate and heartburn/reflux rate were similar between the two groups. We noted no difference in perioperative serum indices, short-term prognosis or postoperative complication rates between the two groups. Conclusions: The study shows that short-term preoperative ONS cannot significantly improve FI and the energy compliance rate in the early stage after radical gastrectomy.

nutrition & dietetics
Comparison of Dietary Intake After Gastric Cancer Gastrectomy Between Patients With and Without Postoperative Surgical Complications

Mie Tanabe,Toru Aoyama,Masato Nakazono,Junya Morita,Kazuki Otani,Shizune Oonuma,Shinnosuke Kawahara,Itaru Hashimoto,Keisuke Komori,Kentaro Hara,Kyohei Kanematsu,Shinsuke Nagasawa,Aya Kato,Yukio Maezawa,Takanobu Yamada,Haruhiko Cho,Norio Yukawa,Takashi Ogata,Yasushi Rino,Aya Saito,Takashi Oshima,MIE TANABE,TORU AOYAMA,MASATO NAKAZONO,JUNYA MORITA,KAZUKI OTANI,SHIZUNE OONUMA,SHINNOSUKE KAWAHARA,ITARU HASHIMOTO,KEISUKE KOMORI,KENTARO HARA,KYOHEI KANEMATSU,SHINSUKE NAGASAWA,AYA KATO,YUKIO MAEZAWA,TAKANOBU YAMADA,HARUHIKO CHO,NORIO YUKAWA,TAKASHI OGATA,YASUSHI RINO,AYA SAITO,TAKASHI OSHIMA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16876

2024-02-01

Anticancer Research

Abstract:BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to compare dietary intake (DI) after gastrectomy for gastric cancer between patients with (C group) and without (NC group) postoperative surgical complications.PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. DI was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire with 82 food items (FFQW82) during nutritional counseling before surgery and at one and three months after surgery.RESULTS: A total of 225 patients participated in this study. Of the 225 patients, 193 had no postoperative complications, and 32 had postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2). The median DI at 1 month postoperatively was 1508 kcal/day in the NC group and 1,470.5 kcal/day in the C group (p=0.175). The median DI at 3 months postoperatively was 1,623 kcal/day in the NC group and 1575 kcal/day in the C group (p=0.473). There was a significant difference between the NC and C groups in the rate of decrease in DI at one month (median: -8.44% vs. -15.37%, p=0.032) and at three months postoperatively (median: -3.58% vs. -6.12%, p=0.038).CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of decrease in DI after gastrectomy between the C and NC groups at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Our results suggest that patients with postoperative surgical complications require additional nutritional treatment for decreased DI.

oncology
Impact of the Aboral Pouch in Roux-en-Y Reconstruction after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Elderly Patients

Akira Kubota,Suguru Yamauchi,Yutaro Yoshimoto,Kenki Tsuda,Yukinori Yube,Sanae Kaji,Hajime Orita,Malcolm V Brock,Tetsu Fukunaga

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14789/jmj.JMJ23-0036-OA

2024-05-24

Abstract:Objectives: The number of elderly people with stomach cancer is increasing; therefore, minimally invasive surgical treatments are required. Elderly patients have multiple comorbidities and are prone to postoperative weight loss, nutritional disorders, Postgastrectomy syndrome (PGS), and decreased quality of life (QOL). Total gastrectomy is particularly associated with these complications, although aboral-pouch creation reportedly improves the condition by compensating for lost reservoir capacity. However, there is no consensus regarding its significance. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the aboral pouch on total gastrectomy outcomes in elderly patients. Materials and methods: Thirty-six patients who met the eligibility criteria, defined as elderly patients aged ≥75 years, were retrospectively analyzed. The patients had undergone Roux-en-Y reconstructions with an aboral pouch in laparoscopic total gastrectomy procedures performed at Juntendo University from July 2016 to June 2022. The main outcomes were postoperative nutritional status, PGS, and QOL. Results: The average postoperative period was approximately 1 year (12.0 vs. 13.5 months, P=0.536), for 14 elderly and 22 non-elderly patients, respectively. Elderly patients had more comorbidities (78.5% vs. 40.9%, P=0.041). The outcome of nutritional status demonstrated no differences in weight-loss rate (-5.3% vs. -8.6%, P=0.651) or prognostic nutritional status (-7.9% vs. -5.9%, P=0.243). There was no significant difference in PGS and QOL between elderly and non-elderly patients. Conclusions: Total gastrectomy with an aboral-pouch creation could be beneficial for elderly 43 patients from the perspective of postoperative nutritional status, PGS, and QOL.
Preoperative nutritional status is a useful predictor of the feasibility of postoperative treatment in octogenarian-plus pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients

Daisaku Yamada,Yu Takeda,Hidenori Takahashi,Kazuki Sasaki,Yoshifumi Iwagami,Yoshito Tomimaru,Takehiro Noda,Shogo Kobayashi,Tadafumi Asaoka,Junzo Shimizu,Yuichiro Doki,Hidetoshi Eguchi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108650

2024-09-04

Abstract:Background: The suitability of radical surgery for very elderly pancreatic cancer (PC) patients remains controversial due to concerns about postoperative functional reserve. Inflammatory-nutritional status may help identify elderly patients at risk of compromised postoperative treatment tolerance. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 121 patients over eighty who were diagnosed with PC in 2010-2019, 40 of whom underwent radical surgery. Surgical outcomes were compared with those of 205 younger patients (under 80 years-old) who underwent radical surgery. K-means cluster analysis was conducted with four inflammatory-nutritional indices (NLR, PLR, PNI, and mGPS) to define, and the indices using ordinal logistic analysis were evaluated in each cluster to create a formula named 'nutritional index (NTI)', which was then used to redefine the clusters. The predictive ability of the NTI was validated in other octogenarians who underwent pancreatectomy for PC between 2020 and 2023. Results: Patients older than eighty exhibited comparable overall survival to younger patients (median survival time, 30.7/37.1 months, p = 0.20). However, octogenarian-plus patients had lower rates of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) initiation (45/80 %) and treatment upon recurrence (52/84 %), resulting in shorter survival after recurrence (7.4/11.1 months, p = 0.06). Inflammatory-nutritional status was significantly associated with overall survival, with poor nutritional status being linked to lower rates of AC initiation and/or treatment upon recurrence. NTI effectively predicted AC feasibility. Conclusions: Radical surgery for octogenarian-plus PC patients meeting the current criteria was safe, but lower rates of postoperative treatment initiation may lead to poorer outcomes after recurrence. Inflammatory-nutritional status assessment could enhance surgical eligibility in octogenarian-plus PC patients.

[SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE TREATMENT OF MYCOSES WITH GRISEOFULVIN].

Post-Discharge Oral Nutritional Supplements With Dietary Advice In Patients At Nutritional Risk After Surgery For Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Effects of different postoperative nutritional support on oxidative stress and clinical outcomes for patients after gastrointestinal surgery

Impact of Oral Nutritional Supplements in Post-Discharge Patients at Nutritional Risk Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomised Clinical Trial

The efficacy of simple oral nutritional supplements versus usual care in postoperative patients with gastric cancer: study protocol for a multicenter, open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial

Effect of Oral Nutritional Supplementation on the Post-Discharge Nutritional Status and Quality of Life of Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients after Surgery: a Multi-Center Study.

Research with adolescents: parental involvement required?

Effects of oral nutritional supplements on body weight and life qualityin post-discharge patients with gastricor colorectal cancer: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

Current status of perioperative nutritional intervention and exercise in gastric cancer surgery: A review

Loss of Body Weight and Skeletal Muscle Negatively Affect Postoperative Outcomes after Major Abdominal Surgery in Geriatric Patients with Cancer.

Gastrointestinal cancer surgery in the elderly: The effects of preoperative oral nutritional supplements - A retrospective study

The loss of body weight and skeletal muscle negatively affect postoperative outcomes after major abdominal surgery in geriatric cancer patients

Sarcopenia is associated with severe postoperative complications in elderly gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy

Effects of postoperative oral elemental nutritional supplement on skeletal muscle loss after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Nutritional Status Between Early and Late Oral Feeding After Esophagectomy

[Effect of an Oral Nutritional Supplementation on Nutritional Status and Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Multi-Center Prospective Randomized Control Trial].

The Effect of Nutrition Intervention With Oral Nutritional Supplements on Ovarian Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

Effects of Preoperative Oral Nutritional Supplements on Improving Postoperative Early Enteral Feeding Intolerance and Short-Term Prognosis for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Single-Center, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Dietary Intake After Gastric Cancer Gastrectomy Between Patients With and Without Postoperative Surgical Complications

Impact of the Aboral Pouch in Roux-en-Y Reconstruction after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Elderly Patients

Preoperative nutritional status is a useful predictor of the feasibility of postoperative treatment in octogenarian-plus pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients