Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for hysterectomy in a hospital network with audit and feedback: A stepped‐wedge cluster randomised trial
Elisa Piovano,Andrea Puppo,Marco Camanni,Anna Castiglione,Elena Maria Delpiano,Lisa Giacometti,Monica Rolfo,Alessio Rizzo,Paolo Zola,Giovannino Ciccone,Eva Pagano,for the ERAS‐Gyneco Piemonte Group,Vittorio Aguggia,Federica Borromeo,Katia Schipani,Daniela Surico,Enrico Badellino,Annamaria Ferrero,Barbara Franzoso,Riccardo Ponzone,Francesco Marocco,Stefano Uccella,Chiara Violino,Monica Torello,Andrea Bianciotto,Marco Canestrelli,Daniela Dompè,Gabriele Molina,Carlo Bocci,Paola Ferraris,Riccardo Fiorentino,Maurizio Brusati,Antonio Alfeo,Mario Gallo,Romeo Geranio,Fabrizio Bogliatto,Massimo Mossetti,Giacomo Vaudano,Alice Peroglio Carus,Marta Sciandra,Pier Luigi Montironi,Federico Tuo,Enrica Bar,Alessandro Antonio Buda,Stefania Cigna Zorzetti,Francesco Lemut,Alessio Garetto,Monica Mascher,Enrico Negrone,Elvira Sorbilli,Roberto Biggiogera,Donato Mastrantuono,Claudio Plazzotta,Elena Del Piano,Paola Coata,Anna De Magistris,Barbara Mitola,Laura Ceretto Giannone,Daria Bongiovanni,Andrea Scoletta,Anna Orlando,Oscar Bertetto,Massimo Aglietta,Mario Airoldi,Alessandro Comandone,Francesco Brunetti,Corinna Defilè,Vitor Hugo Martins,Matteo Papurello,Fabio Saccona,Danila Turco
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17797
2024-02-27
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing elective hysterectomy in a network of regional hospitals, supported by an intensive audit‐and‐feedback (A&F) approach. Design A multi‐centre, stepped‐wedge cluster randomised trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04063072). Setting Gynaecological units in the Piemonte region, Italy. Population Patients undergoing elective hysterectomy, either for cancer or for benign conditions. Methods Twenty‐three units (clusters), stratified by surgical volume, were randomised into four sequences. At baseline (first 3 months), standard care was continued in all units. Subsequently, the four sequences implemented the ERAS protocol successively every 3 months, after specific training. By the end of the study, each unit had a period in which standard care was maintained (control) and a period in which the protocol, supported by feedback, was applied (experimental). Main outcome measures Length of hospital stay (LOS), without outliers (>98th percentile). Results Between September 2019 and May 2021, 2086 patients were included in the main analysis with an intention‐to‐treat approach: 1104 (53%) in the control period and 982 (47%) in the ERAS period. Compliance with the ERAS protocol increased from 60% in the control period to 76% in the experimental period, with an adjusted absolute difference of +13.3% (95% CI 11.6% to 15.0%). LOS, moving from 3.5 to 3.2 days, did not show a significant reduction (−0.12 days; 95% CI −0.30 to 0.07 days). No difference was observed in the occurrence of complications. Conclusions Implementation of the ERAS protocol for hysterectomy at the regional level, supported by an A&F approach, resulted in a substantial improvement in compliance, but without meaningful effects on LOS and complications. This study confirms the effectiveness of A&F in promoting important innovations in an entire hospital network and suggests the need of a higher compliance with the ERAS protocol to obtain valuable improvements in clinical outcomes.
obstetrics & gynecology