Aufmerksamkeitsbelastung und Reaktionszeiten unter Opioiddauertherapie Ein Vergleich mit chronischen Schmerz- patienten und mit Nichtschmerzpatienten

R. Larsen,Heike Otto,E. Dorscheid,R. Larsen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001010050761

1999-09-01

Der Anaesthesist

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Task force Guideline of Brazilian Society of Otology - hearing loss in children - Part II - Treatment

Vagner Antonio Rodrigues Silva,Henrique Furlan Pauna,Joel Lavinsky,Miguel Angelo Hyppolito,Melissa Ferreira Vianna,Mariana Leal,Eduardo Tanaka Massuda,Rogério Hamerschmidt,Fayez Bahmad Jr,Renato Valério Cal,André Luiz Lopes Sampaio,Felippe Felix,Carlos Takahiro Chone,Arthur Menino Castilho

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.11.001

Abstract:Objectives: To provide an overview of the main evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of hearing loss in children and adolescents aged 0-18 years. Methods: Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on childhood hearing loss were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions. Results: The topics were divided into 2 parts: (1) treatment of sensorineural hearing loss: individual hearing aids, bilateral cochlear implants, cochlear implants in young children, unilateral hearing loss, and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder; and (2) treatment of conductive/mixed hearing loss: external/middle ear malformations, ventilation tube insertion, and tympanoplasty in children. Conclusions: In children with hearing loss, in addition to speech therapy, Hearing AIDS (HAs) or implantable systems may be indicated. Even in children with profound hearing loss, both the use of HAs and behavioral assessments while using the device are important.
Task force Guideline of Brazilian Society of Otology ‒ hearing loss in children - Part I ‒ Evaluation

Vagner Antonio Rodrigues Silva,Henrique Furlan Pauna,Joel Lavinsky,Miguel Angelo Hyppolito,Melissa Ferreira Vianna,Mariana Leal,Eduardo Tanaka Massuda,Rogério Hamerschmidt,Fayez Bahmad Jr,Renato Valério Cal,André Luiz Lopes Sampaio,Felippe Felix,Carlos Takahiro Chone,Arthur Menino Castilho

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.11.002

Abstract:Objectives: To provide an overview of the main evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of hearing loss in children and adolescents aged 0 to 18 years. Methods: Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on childhood hearing loss were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions. Results: The evaluation and diagnosis of hearing loss: universal newborn hearing screening, laboratory testing, congenital infections (especially cytomegalovirus), genetic testing and main syndromes, radiologic imaging studies, vestibular assessment of children with hearing loss, auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and noise-induced hearing loss. Conclusions: Every child with suspected hearing loss has the right to diagnosis and appropriate treatment if necessary. This task force considers 5 essential rights: (1) Otolaryngologist consultation; (2) Speech assessment and therapy; (3) Diagnostic tests; (4) Treatment; (5) Ophthalmologist consultation.
Single-Sided Deafness and Hearing Rehabilitation Modalities: Contralateral Routing of Signal Devices, Bone Conduction Devices, and Cochlear Implants

Alessandra Pantaleo,Alessandra Murri,Giada Cavallaro,Vito Pontillo,Debora Auricchio,Nicola Quaranta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14010099

IF: 3.333

2024-01-21

Brain Sciences

Abstract:Single sided deafness (SSD) is characterized by significant sensorineural hearing loss, severe or profound, in only one ear. SSD adversely affects various aspects of auditory perception, including causing impairment in sound localization, difficulties with speech comprehension in noisy environments, and decreased spatial awareness, resulting in a significant decline in overall quality of life (QoL). Several treatment options are available for SSD, including cochlear implants (CI), contralateral routing of signal (CROS), and bone conduction devices (BCD). The lack of consensus on outcome domains and measurement tools complicates treatment comparisons and decision-making. This narrative overview aims to summarize the treatment options available for SSD in adult and pediatric populations, discussing their respective advantages and disadvantages. Rerouting devices (CROS and BCD) attenuate the effects of head shadow and improve sound awareness and signal-to-noise ratio in the affected ear; however, they cannot restore binaural hearing. CROS devices, being non-implantable, are the least invasive option. Cochlear implantation is the only strategy that can restore binaural hearing, delivering significant improvements in speech perception, spatial localization, tinnitus control, and overall QoL. Comprehensive preoperative counseling, including a discussion of alternative technologies, implications of no treatment, expectations, and auditory training, is critical to optimizing therapeutic outcomes.

neurosciences
Cochlear Implantation in Children with Single-Sided Deafness: Does Aetiology and Duration of Deafness Matter?

Susan Arndt,Susanne Prosse,Roland Laszig,Thomas Wesarg,Antje Aschendorff,Frederike Hassepass

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000380744

2015-01-01

Audiology and Neurotology

Abstract:For adult patients with single-sided deafness (SSD), treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) is well established as an acceptable and beneficial hearing rehabilitation method administered routinely in clinical practice. In contrast, for children with SSD, CI has been applied less often to date, with the rationale to decide either on a case-by-case basis or under the realm of clinical research. The aim of our clinical study was to evaluate the longitudinal benefits of CI for a group of children diagnosed with SSD and to compare their outcomes with respect to patient characteristics. Evaluating a pool of paediatric SSD patients presenting for possible CI surgery revealed that the primary aetiology of deafness was congenital cochlear nerve deficiency. A subgroup of children meeting the CI candidacy criteria for the affected ear (the majority with acquired hearing loss) were enrolled in the study. Preliminary group results suggest substantial improvements in speech comprehension in noise and in the ability to localise sound, which was demonstrated through objective and subjective assessments after CI treatment for the group, with results varying from patient to patient. Our study shows a trend towards superior outcomes for children with acquired hearing loss and a shorter duration of hearing loss compared to congenitally deafened children who had a longer duration of SSD. This indicates an interactive influence of the age at onset, aetiology and duration of deafness upon the restoration of binaural integration and the overall benefits of sound stimulation to two ears after CI treatment. Continued longitudinal investigation of these children and further studies in larger groups may provide more guidance on the optimal timing of treatment for paediatric patients with acquired and congenital SSD.
Single-sided deafness and unilateral auditory deprivation in children: current challenge of improving sound localization ability

Jinfeng Liu,Mo Zhou,Xiaolin He,Ningyu Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519896912

2020-01-01

Journal of International Medical Research

Abstract:Interaural time difference and interaural level difference signals are insufficient in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD). This insufficiency leads to an absence of sound localization abilities and a decrease in speech intelligibility in noisy environments. SSD occurring in children further affects their language learning and cognitive abilities and their academic performance because they lack spatial abilities and binaural hearing. The early stages of central auditory system development are critical for auditory function development and morphological refinement. SSD occurring in the critical period can cause significant lateralization in the bilateral auditory pathway. This may increase the risk that affected individuals cannot re-establish binaural benefits after rehabilitation of hearing loss in the post-sensitive period. For otorhinolaryngologists, there is the concern that children with congenital SSD cannot benefit from cochlear implantation. Only a few studies have investigated auditory rehabilitation in children with congenital SSD with cochlear implantation and their results were inconsistent. The present review aims to clarify the main problems and challenges of clinical rehabilitation of congenital SSD, particularly focusing on the effect of CI on sound localization ability in children with congenital SSD.

pharmacology & pharmacy,medicine, research & experimental
Tinnitus reduction in patients with single-sided deafness: the effect of cochlear implantation, bone conduction devices, and contralateral routing of sound hearing aids investigated in a randomized controlled trial

Anne W. Wendrich,Kelly K. S. Assouly,Jan A. A. van Heteren,Jeroen P. M. Peters,Wilko Grolman,Robert J. Stokroos,Huib Versnel,Adriana L. Smit

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1428106

IF: 3.4

2024-07-23

Frontiers in Neurology

Abstract:Objectives: Single-sided deafness (SSD) is often accompanied by tinnitus, resulting in a decreased quality of life. Currently, there is a lack of high level of evidence studies comparing different treatment options for SSD regarding tinnitus reduction. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effect of a cochlear implant (CI), bone conduction device (BCD), contralateral routing of sound (CROS), and no treatment on tinnitus outcomes in SSD patients, with follow-up extending to 24 months. Methods: A total of 120 adult SSD patients were randomized to three groups: CI, a trial period with first a BCD on a headband, then a CROS, or vice versa. After the trial periods, patients opted for a BCD, CROS, or no treatment. At the start of follow-up, 28 patients were implanted with a CI, 25 patients with a BCD, 34 patients had a CROS, and 26 patients chose no treatment. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were completed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. Results: The CI and BCD groups showed significantly decreased tinnitus impact scores. The CI group showed the largest decrease, which was already observed at 3 months of follow-up. Compared to the baseline, the median THI score decreased by 23 points, the TQ score by 17 points, and the VAS score by 60 points at 24 months. In the BCD group, the TQ score decreased by 9 points, and the VAS decreased by 25 points at 24 months. The HADS anxiety and depression subscale showed no indication for anxiety or depression at baseline, nor at 24 months, for all groups. Conclusion: In this RCT, SSD patients treated with a CI or BCD showed an overall decrease in tinnitus impact scores up to 24 months compared to baseline. The CI group reported a stable and the largest reduction. Cochlear implants appear to be superior to BCD and CROS, and no treatment for achieving partial or complete resolution of tinnitus in patients with SSD. Clinical trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register, www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl/nl/trial/26952, NTR4457, CINGLE trial.

neurosciences,clinical neurology
Single-Sided Deafness, Tinnitus and Cochlear Implants

Marcia Yuri Tsumura Kimura,Kellen Kutscher,Alexandre Caixeta Guimaraes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-9455.1000107

2016-01-01

Abstract:Background: Single-sided deafness is a situation of profound hearing loss on one side, with normal hearing contralateral or near them (better than 40 dB HL). The only way to rehabilitate the side with single-sided deafness would be through the cochlear implant. Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the outcomes of a cochlear implant in a case of single-sided deafness with tinnitus and perform a short literature review of this topic. Methods: Retrospective study of medical records of a patient who underwent surgery treatment for single-sided deafness and tinnitus with cochlear implant. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation was an effective alternative for a patient with single- sided deafness, resulting in improvements in speech recognition and the tinnitus.
Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit

David A Prejban,Jafar-Sasan Hamzavi,Christoph Arnoldner,Rudolfs Liepins,Clemens Honeder,Alexandra Kaider,Wolfgang Gstöttner,Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner,Dominik Riss

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001963

Abstract:Objectives: Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) have great difficulties in listening situations which rely on binaural auditory processing. The purpose of this study was to examine to which extent a cochlear implant (CI) can improve speech perception outcomes in various noisy listening environments. Additionally, the ability to use interaural level differences for sound localization and subjective benefit with the CI were assessed. Methods: Ten single-sided deaf patients with CI were tested in different loudspeaker configurations with and without the CI. A multi-source noise field (MSNF) with uncorrelated noise from four different directions was used in addition to a setup with the signal from the CI side and noise from the normal-hearing side (SCINNH, azimuth of ±45 degrees). Ten normal-hearing subjects were used as a control for the setup. Speech understanding was measured by an adaptive sentence test (Oldenburg Sentence Test, OLSA) in stationary speech shaped noise and temporally modulated noise to assess the benefit in each listening situation. Sensitivity to interaural level differences was measured in a lateralization experiment. Furthermore, patients completed the Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness (BBSS) questionnaire to assess subjective benefit with the CI. Results: An overall average benefit in speech reception threshold (SRT) of 1.6 dB (±0.6 dB standard error of the mean [SEM]) was observed in the binaural listening condition (with CI) in all conditions. In the MSNF setup thresholds improved by 0.4 dB (±0.5 dB SEM) and in the SCINNH configuration by 2.7 dB (±0.7 dB SEM). The choice of masking noise effect also had a significant effect on the SRT outcome. The lateralization performance of the SSD users was on a par with the normal hearing group. BBSS scores reflect the overall benefit with the CI apparent in the speech test results. Conclusion: Patients with single-sided deafness do benefit from a CI in difficult listening environments and are able to localize sound based on interaural level differences. Considering these outcomes, cochlear implantation represents a promising treatment option for patients with single-sided deafness.
Rab14 is part of the early endosomal clathrin‐coated TGN microdomain

T. Proikas-Cezanne,Anja Gaugel,T. Frickey,A. Nordheim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2006.08.053

2006-10-02

FEBS Letters

Abstract:
Bone-anchored devices in single-sided deafness.

C M Stewart,J H Clark,J K Niparko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000323589

2011-01-01

Abstract:Single sided deafness (SSD) implies sensorineural hearing loss in one ear with normal contralateral hearing function. Traditionally, SSD patients have been overlooked due to a belief that the preserved functioning of the contralateral ear compensates for the nonhearing side. SSD patients however experience multiple audiological difficulties, particularly when the sound source is situated on the non-hearing side or in the presence of competing sounds. Through reviewing current literature, we describe the role of bone-anchored devices (Baha) in the management of SSD patients. Recent publications for Baha in SSD have demonstrated consistent objective and subjective improvement in audiologic metrics when compared to unaided conditions. There is also evidence of benefit provided by Baha by the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, in global measures of ease of communication, reverberation, and background noise, but not typically in aversiveness to sounds. Interestingly, despite some patients gaining minimal objective or subjective benefits, the majority of these patients still report improved quality of life and would recommend the procedure. Despite increasing evidence for the role of Baha in the management of SSD in the literature, much of these data are based on older technology. Further reports should specify the processor type used and the etiology of the hearing loss to ensure accuracy of future data.
Etiology of single-sided deafness and asymmetrical hearing loss

Shin-ichi Usami,Ryosuke Kitoh,Hideaki Moteki,Shin-ya Nishio,Tomohiro Kitano,Masafumi Kobayashi,Jun Shinagawa,Yoh Yokota,Kenjiro Sugiyama,Kizuki Watanabe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2017.1300321

2017-03-10

Abstract:CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed that various etiologies are involved in single-sided deafness (SSD), and that the cause of SSD and asymmetrical hearing loss (AHL) differed greatly between congenital/early-onset cases and adult cases. Clarification of the etiology is the first step toward providing appropriate intervention.OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to clarify the etiology of SSD and AHL patients.METHODS: The etiology of a total of 527 SSD or AHL patients who visited Shinshu University Hospital between 2006 and 2016 were analyzed by imaging as well as serological tests for mumps virus, and CMV DNA testing.RESULTS: In our cohort of congenital/early-onset SSD (n = 210), the most prevalent cause in children was cochlear nerve deficiency (43.7%; 87 of 199 patients undergoing CT and/or MRI), followed by CMV infection, mumps infection, anomalies of the inner ear, ANSD, and other rare etiologies. In contrast, half of the adult SSD patients presented with idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss, followed by various types of otitis media, cerebellopontine angle tumor and other rare etiologies.

otorhinolaryngology
Unilateral Hearing Loss and Single-Sided Deafness in Children: an Update on Diagnosis and Management

Patricia L. Purcell,Sharon L. Cushing,Blake C. Papsin,Karen A. Gordon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-020-00293-8

2020-06-08

Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports

Abstract:Purpose of ReviewThis review highlights our current understanding of the impact of unilateral hearing loss and single-sided deafness in children, offering insight into diagnosis and management.Recent FindingsChildren with unilateral hearing loss develop an aural preference toward their better hearing ear, leading to difficulties with spatial navigation, balance, speech/language skills, and quality of life when compared with typical hearing peers. Cochlear nerve aplasia and cytomegalovirus are among the most common etiologies for unilateral hearing loss, which has important implications for treatment. Hearing rehabilitation relies upon early correction of hearing loss with an appropriate auditory prosthesis. In children with single-sided deafness, cochlear implants are the only intervention that potentially offers restoration of bilateral hearing, and studies continue to refine candidacy protocols.SummaryUnilateral hearing loss has important consequences for children. Recent studies emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and investigate ways to appropriately restore bilateral hearing in these children.
What Is the Patient's Choice?

Margaux Loukine Bézé,Mathilde Puechmaille,Chloé Trillat,Antoine Barrat,Justine Bécaud,Nicolas Saroul,Toufic Khalil,Guillaume Coll,Thierry Mom

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195967

IF: 3.9

2024-10-09

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Background: Surgical resection of vestibular schwannomas (VS) can be responsible for single-sided deafness (SSD). Hearing restoration can be a challenge both for the otolaryngologist and the patient. Patients and Methods: In a retrospective series, we analyzed the charts of SSD patients operated on for VS from 2005–2021, checking which type of hearing rehabilitation was chosen. All patients who wanted a hearing restoration underwent a hearing in noise test (HINT) in a stereo auditorium with and without a bone-anchored hearing device (BAHD) worn with a headband on the deaf side. Then, they had a preimplantation one-month trial with the BAHD at home vs. contralateral routing of signal (CROS) or BiCROS (with contralateral signal amplification) hearing aids (HAs). Results: Among 52 charts of the included adult SSD patients, only 29 (56%) eventually chose a hearing rehabilitation device (14 BAHD). Only one BAHD patient required a device explantation for skin complications, but then asked for reimplantation. Another one swapped the BAHD for HAs 2.5 years after. Two patients only occasionally used their BAHD with a headband. Nine patients preferred HAs, mainly BiCROS. Their contralateral hearing was significantly less than BAHD patients (p < 0.05), and only three used their HAs every day. Conclusions: Hearing rehabilitation in SSD patients after VS surgical resection is chosen in about 50% of cases. In complement of HINT, a real-life comparative hearing trial helps patients chose the best device, with good long-term results when a BAHD is chosen. HAs are preferred when contralateral hearing is altered but are not always worn.

medicine, general & internal
Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness in Pediatric Patients: A Critical Assessment of Usage Rate

Robert J Macielak,Celine Richard,Prashant S Malhotra,Oliver F Adunka,Ursula M Findlen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004331

2024-12-01

Abstract:Objective: To assess the usage rate of pediatric patients undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) for single-sided deafness (SSD). Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary care pediatric referral center. Patients: Pediatric patients who underwent CI for SSD. Interventions: CI with requisite audiometric follow-up. Main outcome measures: Device use and audiometric testing. Results: Sixty-six patients were implanted for SSD between 8/2015 and 7/2023 at a median age of 4.7 years (interquartile range, 1.7-7.7 yr). The cause of hearing loss was unknown in the majority of cases (28 patients, 42%), with cytomegalovirus being the most common known cause (17 patients, 26%). Hearing loss was prelingual in 38 patients (58%). Post-implantation, 12 patients (18%) were identified as lost to follow-up. For the remaining 54 patients, the median length of audiometric follow-up was 1.4 years (interquartile range, 0.9-2.2 yr). At last evaluation, only 10 of these 54 patients (19%) were designated as users (≥6 h per day), and 13 patients (24%) were designated as limited users (>2 but <6 h per day). Of patients capable of performing speech-in-noise testing (n = 13), 11 patients (85%) showed improvement on BKB-SIN SNR-50 testing with their implant on versus off with a mean improvement of 3 dB. Notably, 4 of these 11 patients (36%) were categorized as nonusers despite this benefit. Conclusions: Despite audiometric benefit from CI in the pediatric SSD population, usage rates over time remain markedly lower than anticipated at a high-volume, well-resourced tertiary care pediatric center. No influencing factors were identified, warranting critical assessment to ensure appropriate resource allocation.
Re-training the deaf ear: Auditory training for adult cochlear implant users with singlesided deafness

Dayse Távora-Vieira,Roberta Marino

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2019.1603652

2019-04-11

Cochlear Implants International

Abstract:Objective: While cochlear implant (CI) provision for adults with single-sided deafness (SSD) is now an accepted treatment option, auditory training programs specific to this group of CI users have not been described. This paper details the auditory training protocol and critical factors required to rehabilitate CI users with post-lingual SSD.Outcomes and Results: Several key factors are integral to the success of the rehabilitation program; these include 1) CI users with SSD require a map that is balanced as closely as possible to their normal hearing ear and has optimal mapping levels; 2) the auditory training program needs to be stimulating, rewarding, and directly stimulate the implanted ear via Direct Auditory Input (DAI); 3) CI users need to achieve some success in the early post-implantation stages to maintain or increase their motivation; 3) CI users need to be fully committed to the auditory training; and 5) a well-defined structured auditory training program with immediate feedback and markers of success helps ensure optimal communication outcomes. As an indication of success, from the foundation of the program in 2008 until the present all adults with SSD who have received a CI at our clinic (N = 114) only 5 have elected to stop using their device.Conclusion: The auditory training program described herein has been developed to optimize hearing and quality of life outcomes for adult CI users with SSD.
A Multimodal Investigation of Listening Effort in Single-Sided Deafness

Don Luong Nguyen,Olivier Valentin,Alexandre Lehmann,François Prévost

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_aja-24-00073

2024-10-13

American Journal of Audiology

Abstract:Purpose: For patients with single-sided deafness (SSD), choosing between bone conduction devices (BCDs) and contralateral routing of signal hearing aids (CROS) is challenging due to mixed evidence on their benefits. The lack of clear guidelines complicates clinical decision making. This study explores whether realistic spatial listening measures can reveal a clinically valid benefit and if the optimal choice varies among patients. By assessing listening effort through objective and subjective measures, this research evaluates the efficacy of BCD and CROS, seeking to provide evidence-based recommendation anchored in the effectiveness of these devices in real-world scenarios. Method: Thirteen participants with SSD performed the Hearing-in-Noise Test while using a BCD, CROS hearing aids, and no hearing device (unaided). Subjective listening effort was assessed using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire after each testing block. An objective measurement of listening effort was obtained by measuring the peak pupil dilation (PPD) during the task using eye tracking glasses. Results: No significant difference of either PPD or NASA-TLX scores was observed between the three device conditions (BCD, CROS, and unaided). However, a trend is noted toward reduced PPD in the BCD and CROS conditions. The lack of significance in pupillometry results does not stem from technical issues, as the study's findings confirm its effectiveness in measuring task difficulty, and validate its use for assessing listening effort. Conclusions: Although the results from the present study cannot significantly differentiate the hearing devices, we observe a trend that points toward reduced listening effort when using hearing devices. Future investigations should aim to optimize metrics of listening effort, perhaps making them clinically useful on an individual level.

otorhinolaryngology,audiology & speech-language pathology
Factors Predictive of Binaural Hearing Restoration by Cochlear Implant in Single-Sided Deafness

Guillaume Gersdorff,Vincent Péan,Séverine Camby,Sébastien Barriat,Philippe P. Lefebvre

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000535650

2024-01-08

Audiology and Neurotology

Abstract:Introduction: Cochlear implants (CIs) can restore binaural hearing in cases of single-sided deafness (SSD). However, studies with a high level of evidence in support of this phenomenon are lacking. The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of CIs using several spatialized speech-in-noise tests and to identify potential predictors of successful surgery. Methods: Ten cases underwent standard CI surgery (MEDEL-Flex24). The speech-in-noise test was used in three different spatial configurations. The noise was presented from the front (N0), toward the CI (NCI), and toward the ear (Near), while the speech was always from the front (S0). For each test, the speech-to-noise ratio at 50% intelligibility (SNR50) was evaluated. Seven different effects were assessed (summation, head shadow [HS], speech released of masking [SRM], and squelch for the CI and for the ear). Results: A significant summation effect of 1.5 dB was observed. Contralateral PTA was positively correlated with S0N0-B and S0NCI-B (CIon and unplugged ear). S0N0-B results were positively correlated with S0N0-CIoff ( p < 0.0001) and with S0Near-CIoff results ( p = 0.004). A significant positive correlation was found between delay post-activation and HS gain for the CI ( p = 0.005). Finally, the HS was negatively correlated with the squelch effect for the ear. Conclusion: CI benefits patients with SSD in noise and can improve the threshold for detecting low-level noise. Contralateral PTA could predict good postoperative results. Simple tests performed preoperatively can predict the likelihood of surgical success in reversing SSD.

neurosciences,otorhinolaryngology,audiology & speech-language pathology
Functional Reorganization of the Central Auditory System in Children with Single-Sided Deafness: A Protocol Using fNIRS

Marie-Noëlle Calmels,Yohan Gallois,Mathieu Marx,Olivier Deguine,Soumia Taoui,Emma Arnaud,Kuzma Strelnikov,Pascal Barone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12040423

IF: 3.333

2022-03-22

Brain Sciences

Abstract:In children, single-sided deafness (SSD) affects the development of linguistic and social skills and can impede educational progress. These difficulties may relate to cortical changes that occur following SSD, such as reduced inter-hemispheric functional asymmetry and maladaptive brain plasticity. To investigate these neuronal changes and their evolution in children, a non-invasive technique is required that is little affected by motion artifacts. Here, we present a research protocol that uses functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to evaluate the reorganization of cortical auditory asymmetry in children with SSD; it also examines how the cortical changes relate to auditory and language skills. The protocol is designed for children whose SSD has not been treated, because hearing restoration can alter both brain reorganization and behavioral performance. We propose a single-center, cross-sectional study that includes 30 children with SSD (congenital or acquired moderate-to-profound deafness) and 30 children with normal hearing (NH), all aged 5–16 years. The children undergo fNIRS during monaural and binaural stimulation, and the pattern of cortical activity is analyzed using measures of the peak amplitude and area under the curve for both oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin. These cortical measures can be compared between the two groups of children, and analyses can be run to determine whether they relate to binaural hearing (speech-in-noise and sound localization), speech perception and production, and quality of life (QoL). The results could be of relevance for developing individualized rehabilitation programs for SSD, which could reduce patients’ difficulties and prevent long-term neurofunctional and clinical consequences.

neurosciences
Cochlear implant treatment of patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss

S. Arndt,R. Laszig,A. Aschendorff,F. Hassepass,R. Beck,T. Wesarg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-016-0297-5

2017-02-10

HNO

Abstract:BackgroundThe rehabilitation of patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) or asymmetric hearing loss can be achieved with conventional (Bi)CROS hearing aids ((Bi)CROS-HA, (Bi)CROS), bone conduction devices (BCI) or with cochlear implants (CI). Unfortunately, only small case series have been published on the treatment outcomes in SSD patients after CI surgery and there are only a few comparative studies evaluating rehabilitation outcomes.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to provide evidence of successful treatment of SSD and asymmetric hearing loss with a CI compared to the untreated, monaural hearing condition and the therapy options of BCI and (Bi)CROS in a large number of patients.Materials and methodsIn a single-centre study, 45 patients with SSD and 40 patients with asymmetric hearing loss were treated with a CI after careful evaluation for CI candidacy. Monaural speech comprehension in noise and localisation ability were examined with (Bi)CROS-HA and BCI devices (on a test rod) both preoperatively and at 12 months after CI switch-on. At the same intervals, subjective evaluation of hearing ability was conducted using the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).Results and discussionThis report presents the first evidence of successful binaural rehabilitation with CI in a relatively large patient cohort and the advantages over (Bi)CROS and BCI in smaller subgroups, thus confirming the indication for CI treatment. Moreover, patients with long-term acquired deafness (>10 years) show a benefit from the CI comparable to that observed in patients with shorter-term deafness.

otorhinolaryngology
The Influence of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review

Nicole Peter,Nuwan Liyanage,Flurin Pfiffner,Alexander Huber,Tobias Kleinjung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599819846084

2019-05-07

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery

Abstract:Objectives This systematic review provides an overview of the available studies (published by January 29, 2018) with descriptive data analysis about the influence of cochlear implantation on tinnitus in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD). Data Sources PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Review Methods Original studies about the influence of cochlear implantation on tinnitus, measured with different tinnitus questionnaires or visual analog scale, in patients with SSD were included. The pre- and postimplantation tinnitus scores of the included studies were extracted for the further systematic review. Results The systematic search yielded 1028 studies. After evaluating titles, abstracts, and full texts, 1011 of these were dismissed. From the remaining 17 studies, 4 showed a low directness of evidence or high risk of bias and were therefore excluded. Due to the nature of cochlear implantation in SSD, only cohort studies and no randomized trials exist, which limits the evaluation in a systematic review. Generally, the mean tinnitus questionnaire scores decreased after cochlear implantation in these 13 studies with a total of 153 patients. The most widely used tinnitus questionnaire was the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. In these studies, 34.2% of patients demonstrated complete suppression, 53.7% an improvement, 7.3% a stable value, and 4.9% an increase of tinnitus, and none of the patients reported an induction of tinnitus. Conclusion This review shows a clear improvement of tinnitus complaints after cochlear implantation in patients with SSD. Therefore, tinnitus might be considered as an additional indication for cochlear implantation in SSD.

Aufmerksamkeitsbelastung und Reaktionszeiten unter Opioiddauertherapie Ein Vergleich mit chronischen Schmerz- patienten und mit Nichtschmerzpatienten

Task force Guideline of Brazilian Society of Otology - hearing loss in children - Part II - Treatment

Task force Guideline of Brazilian Society of Otology ‒ hearing loss in children - Part I ‒ Evaluation

Single-Sided Deafness and Hearing Rehabilitation Modalities: Contralateral Routing of Signal Devices, Bone Conduction Devices, and Cochlear Implants

Cochlear Implantation in Children with Single-Sided Deafness: Does Aetiology and Duration of Deafness Matter?

Single-sided deafness and unilateral auditory deprivation in children: current challenge of improving sound localization ability

Tinnitus reduction in patients with single-sided deafness: the effect of cochlear implantation, bone conduction devices, and contralateral routing of sound hearing aids investigated in a randomized controlled trial

Single-Sided Deafness, Tinnitus and Cochlear Implants

Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit

Rab14 is part of the early endosomal clathrin‐coated TGN microdomain

Bone-anchored devices in single-sided deafness.

Etiology of single-sided deafness and asymmetrical hearing loss

Unilateral Hearing Loss and Single-Sided Deafness in Children: an Update on Diagnosis and Management

What Is the Patient's Choice?

Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness in Pediatric Patients: A Critical Assessment of Usage Rate

Re-training the deaf ear: Auditory training for adult cochlear implant users with singlesided deafness

A Multimodal Investigation of Listening Effort in Single-Sided Deafness

Factors Predictive of Binaural Hearing Restoration by Cochlear Implant in Single-Sided Deafness

Functional Reorganization of the Central Auditory System in Children with Single-Sided Deafness: A Protocol Using fNIRS

Cochlear implant treatment of patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss

The Influence of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review