Abstract:Acuity assessments are vital for timely interventions and fair resource allocation in critical care settings. Conventional acuity scoring systems heavily depend on subjective patient assessments, leaving room for implicit bias and errors. These assessments are often manual, time-consuming, intermittent, and challenging to interpret accurately, especially for healthcare providers. This risk of bias and error is likely most pronounced in time-constrained and high-stakes environments, such as critical care settings. Furthermore, such scores do not incorporate other information, such as patients' mobility level, which can indicate recovery or deterioration in the intensive care unit (ICU), especially at a granular level. We hypothesized that wearable sensor data could assist in assessing patient acuity granularly, especially in conjunction with clinical data from electronic health records (EHR). In this prospective study, we evaluated the impact of integrating mobility data collected from wrist-worn accelerometers with clinical data obtained from EHR for estimating acuity. Accelerometry data were collected from 87 patients wearing accelerometers on their wrists in an academic hospital setting. The data was evaluated using five deep neural network models: VGG, ResNet, MobileNet, SqueezeNet, and a custom Transformer network. These models outperformed a rule-based clinical score (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, SOFA) used as a baseline when predicting acuity state (for ground truth we labeled as unstable patients if they needed life-supporting therapies, and as stable otherwise), particularly regarding the precision, sensitivity, and F1 score. The results demonstrate that integrating accelerometer data with demographics and clinical variables improves predictive performance compared to traditional scoring systems in healthcare. Deep learning models consistently outperformed the SOFA score baseline across various scenarios, showing notable enhancements in metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC), precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. The most comprehensive scenario, leveraging accelerometer, demographics, and clinical data, achieved the highest AUC of 0.73, compared to 0.53 when using SOFA score as the baseline, with significant improvements in precision (0.80 vs. 0.23), specificity (0.79 vs. 0.73), and F1 score (0.77 vs. 0.66). This study demonstrates a novel approach beyond the simplistic differentiation between stable and unstable conditions. By incorporating mobility and comprehensive patient information, we distinguish between these states in critically ill patients and capture essential nuances in physiology and functional status. Unlike rudimentary definitions, such as equating low blood pressure with instability, our methodology delves deeper, offering a more holistic understanding and potentially valuable insights for acuity assessment.

Using electronic health records to classify risk for adverse safety events with ICU patient Mobility: A Cross-Sectional study

Patient, Practice, and Organizational Factors Associated With Early Mobility Performance in Critically Ill Adults

Using Electronic Health Record Collected Clinical Variables to Predict Medical Intensive Care Unit Mortality

Safety and Feasibility of Early Mobilization in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and External Ventricular Drain

Original Research: Implementation of an Early Mobility Program in an ICU

Prediction of Bedridden Duration of Hospitalized Patients by Machine Learning Based on EMRs at Admission

A Culture of Early Mobilization in Adult Intensive Care Units: Perspective and Competency of Physicians

Improving ICU Risk Predictive Models Through Automation Designed for Resiliency Against Documentation Bias

The Potential of Wearable Sensors for Assessing Patient Acuity in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

Smart Health-Enhanced Early Mobilisation in Intensive Care Units

Monitoring Diagnostic Safety Risks in Emergency Departments: Protocol for a Machine Learning Study

ICU nurses' practice and intention to implement early mobilization: A multi‐centre cross‐sectional survey

Developing EMR-based algorithms to Identify hospital adverse events for health system performance evaluation and improvement: Study protocol

Early mobilisation in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a subanalysis of the ESICM-initiated UNITE-COVID observational study

Preimplementation of Critical Care Early Mobility Clinical Decision Support

Wearable sensors in patient acuity assessment in critical care

Risk Categories for Discharge Planning Using AM-PAC "6-Clicks" Basic Mobility Scores in Non-Surgical Hospitalized Adults

Caregiver perceptions of an early mobility and communication protocol in the pediatric ICU

Using Machine Learning and Electronic Health Records to Identify Neuropsychiatric Risk Scores for Delirium in ICU and General Hospital Settings

Machine learning functional impairment classification with electronic health record data

Quality Improvement Methodology to Optimize Safe Early Mobility in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit