Abstract:Background: Surgery is the main modality of cure for solid cancers and was prioritised to continue during COVID-19 outbreaks. This study aimed to identify immediate areas for system strengthening by comparing the delivery of elective cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in periods of lockdown versus light restriction. Methods: This international, prospective, cohort study enrolled 20 006 adult (≥18 years) patients from 466 hospitals in 61 countries with 15 cancer types, who had a decision for curative surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic and were followed up until the point of surgery or cessation of follow-up (Aug 31, 2020). Average national Oxford COVID-19 Stringency Index scores were calculated to define the government response to COVID-19 for each patient for the period they awaited surgery, and classified into light restrictions (index <20), moderate lockdowns (20-60), and full lockdowns (>60). The primary outcome was the non-operation rate (defined as the proportion of patients who did not undergo planned surgery). Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to explore the associations between lockdowns and non-operation. Intervals from diagnosis to surgery were compared across COVID-19 government response index groups. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04384926. Findings: Of eligible patients awaiting surgery, 2003 (10·0%) of 20 006 did not receive surgery after a median follow-up of 23 weeks (IQR 16-30), all of whom had a COVID-19-related reason given for non-operation. Light restrictions were associated with a 0·6% non-operation rate (26 of 4521), moderate lockdowns with a 5·5% rate (201 of 3646; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·77-0·84; p<0·0001), and full lockdowns with a 15·0% rate (1775 of 11 827; HR 0·51, 0·50-0·53; p<0·0001). In sensitivity analyses, including adjustment for SARS-CoV-2 case notification rates, moderate lockdowns (HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·80-0·88; p<0·001), and full lockdowns (0·57, 0·54-0·60; p<0·001), remained independently associated with non-operation. Surgery beyond 12 weeks from diagnosis in patients without neoadjuvant therapy increased during lockdowns (374 [9·1%] of 4521 in light restrictions, 317 [10·4%] of 3646 in moderate lockdowns, 2001 [23·8%] of 11 827 in full lockdowns), although there were no differences in resectability rates observed with longer delays. Interpretation: Cancer surgery systems worldwide were fragile to lockdowns, with one in seven patients who were in regions with full lockdowns not undergoing planned surgery and experiencing longer preoperative delays. Although short-term oncological outcomes were not compromised in those selected for surgery, delays and non-operations might lead to long-term reductions in survival. During current and future periods of societal restriction, the resilience of elective surgery systems requires strengthening, which might include protected elective surgical pathways and long-term investment in surge capacity for acute care during public health emergencies to protect elective staff and services. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, Medtronic, Sarcoma UK, The Urology Foundation, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research.

Last minute cancellation of elective lung cancer surgery is associated with poorer survival

Effect of Interval Between Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery on Oncological Outcomes in Poor Responders with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Surgical Treatments of Chinese Patients with Lung Malignant Tumors.

Association of Surgical Timing with Outcomes in Early Stage Lung Cancer

Causes of Cancellation of 691 Inpatient Elective Surgeries and the Management Countermeasures

Pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer: contemporary outcomes, risk factors and model validation

Contributing Factors of Elective Surgical Case Cancellation: a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study at a Single-Site Hospital

Factors associated with elective surgical case cancellation at a tertiary hospital in Malawi

Factors Associated With Delay in Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Surgery in a Lung Cancer Screening Program

Perioperative Management May Improve Long-term Survival in Patients after Lung Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Estimating the Impact of Extended Delay to Surgery for Stage I Non-small-cell Lung Cancer on Survival

Delay to surgical treatment in lung cancer patients and its impact on survival in a video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy cohort

Reasons for Surgical Attrition Among Nonmetastatic Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients: A Single Institutional Experience

Effect of COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns on planned cancer surgery for 15 tumour types in 61 countries: an international, prospective, cohort study

Association Between Surgical Quality and Long-Term Survival in Lung Cancer

Assessing the Rates and Reasons of Elective Surgical Cancellations on the Day of Surgery: A Multicentre Study from Urban Indian Hospitals

Small airway dysfunction associated with poor short-term outcomes in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer

Cause-specific death after surgical resection for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

Clinical Impact of Delaying Surgery in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival

Surgery challenges and postoperative complications of lung cancer after neoadjuvant immunotherapy

Patient-reported harm following cancellation of planned surgery at a Danish university hospital: a cross-sectional study