Abstract:Background: Ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) caused by coronary artery disease accounts for the largest proportion of heart failure cases with the worst prognosis. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the most effective treatment for ischaemic HFrEF. On-pump and off-pump are the two surgical methods used for CABG. Whether patients with HFrEF should undergo on- or off-pump CABG is controversial in coronary heart disease surgery. The left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVSEVI) is the gold standard for evaluating the severity of left ventricular remodelling; however, its effect on the perioperative risk and long-term survival rate of patients with HFrEF undergoing CABG remains unclear. Methods: This single centre prospective cohort analysis included 118 coronary heart disease patients with symptoms and signs of heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <40% who were enrolled consecutively from January 2019 to December 2023. Operative mortality, perioperative complications, and long-term survival were compared among patients treated with various LVESVIs and surgical methods. The primary outcomes were cardiac death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, and revascularization, (percutaneous coronary intervention or redo CABG) with a median follow-up of 38 ± 10 months. Results: The 30-day postoperative mortality of 118 patients was 6.8%. Patients in the off-pump group had significantly higher perioperative mortality than those in the on-pump group (12.5% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.03). In the off-pump group, a higher proportion of patients required perioperative mechanical assistance, such as intra-aortic artery balloon pump (IABP) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), compared to those in the on-pump group (IABP: 75% vs. 47.4%, p = 0.004; ECMO: 22.5% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.000). Patients in the off-pump group were more likely to have postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) (35% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.01). In the on-pump group, the incidence of postoperative AF (25% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.02) and IABP use (62.5% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.03) were significantly higher in patients with more severe left ventricular remodelling than in those with less severe left ventricular remodelling. In the off-pump group, patients with more severe left ventricular remodelling had higher ECMO usage (38.9% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.04), incidence of postoperative AF (61.1% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.02), and perioperative mortality (22.2%). Major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free survival rate was significantly higher in the on-pump group than in the off-pump group, and there was no significant difference in MACE free survival rates between the two groups of patients with different degrees of left ventricular remodelling. Conclusion: On-pump bypass is a better surgical procedure for patients with ischaemic HFrEF, especially those with severe left ventricular remodelling. Left ventricular remodelling increases perioperative mortality but has no effect on long-term survival.

Clinical Outcomes of Concomitant Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting During Ventricular Septal Myectomy

Concomitant mitral valve surgery in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Mid-Term Results of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients with Ischaemic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction and No Detected Myocardial Viability

Surgical treatment of symptomatic left anterior descending myocardial bridges: myotomy vs. bypass surgery

Surgical Strategies and Outcomes for Myocardial Bridges Coexisting with Other Cardiac Conditions

Effects Of Myocardial Viability And Left Ventricular Remodeling On Survival Of Patients With Heart Failure And Reduced Ejection Fraction After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Concomitant valve surgery is associated with worse outcomes in surgical treatments of post-infarction ventricular aneurysm

Outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with severely dilated left ventricle.

Clinical Effect of the Modified Morrow Septal Myectomy Procedure for Biventricular Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Ischaemic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction with or Without Detected Viable Myocardium.

Outcomes of concomitant myectomy and left ventricular apical aneurysm repair in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

The clinical effect and cardiac function of patients undergoing simultaneous ventricular aneurysm resection without extracorporeal circulation after coronary artery bypass grafting

Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Severe Left Ventricular Dilatation

The impact of placing multiple grafts to each myocardial territory on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Multiple Arterial Conduits for Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Mild to Moderate Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: a Multicenter Retrospective Study

Midterm Outcomes of Simultaneous Hybrid Coronary Artery Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Ninety-seven Cases of Experiences with the Left Thoracotomy Approach for Off-Pump Conventional Revascularization: a Retrospective Cohort Study

[Surgical Strategies and Long-Term Outcomes of Total Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: a Series of 208 Patients].

Single or Multiple Arterial Bypass Graft Surgery Vs. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Three-Vessel or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

Outcomes of Radial Artery versus Saphenous Vein as a Second Conduit after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Effects of different surgical strategies and left ventricular remodelling on the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction