Abstract:Toxicological Science, especially in the last five decades, has witnessed rapid evolution of different tools and techniques developed to address diverse issues related to studies dealing with adverse health effects of a variety of poisons, drugs, chemicals,ever-growing list of xenobiotics and human diseases. Traditionally these studies are performed using suitable animal (in vivo) models. There was a time when toxicologists/pharmacologists were searching models alternate to animal toxicity testing (Doke and Dhawale, 2015). Improved cell culture techniques, knowledge on stem cells and other microbiological systems led to the development of in vitro toxicology. It was soon followed by DNA chips, micro fluidics, in silico toxicology , toxicogenomics and computational toxicology. Several platforms are now discussing machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) together as future tools of computational toxicology. For decades, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) methods have been employed to study the effects of drugs/chemicals (Cai et al., 2022). However, AI methods for toxicity assessment ranging from ADMEtox to AI4TOX provide evidence to the immense potential of AI. Intriguingly, a few problems between theoretical developments and practice of AI by end users have been recognized. AI is now being employed in cancer care. According to WHO (2022), cancer is responsible for 9.3 million deaths per year. AI is being used for cancer grading, classification, follow up services and diagnostic accuracy. However, certain limitations viz. testing, validation, certification and auditing need to be addressed (Cabral et al., (2023). Potential of AI in diabetic care and management has recently been recognized. The huge burden of diabetic patients in India can be managed through AI tools. Diabetic risk can be predicted using genomic data, to diagnose diabetes using EHR data and to identify diabetes related complications i.e. retinopathy and nephropathy (Singhla et al., 2019). Application of AI in the management of cardiovascular diseases like myocardial infarction has been highlighted with special reference to Chinese medicine (Chen et al., 2022). There exists experimental evidence that AI tools can be used to assess, monitor and manage Parkinsons' disease (Bounsall et al., 2023). Perspectives of the application of AI in complimentary and alternative medicine were reviewed by Chu et al. (2022). Several regulatory agencies are now adopting the concept of 3R ie., replacement, reduction and refinement of animal testing (EU REACH/3R principles; Toxicology 21 of U.S. Government) ( Maestri, 2021).The application of AI in clinical toxicology through converging data resources, algorithms, real world information from sensors and health records has also been discussed (Sinha et al. 2021). Plausibility of toxicity prediction using AI tools was recently reviewed by Santin et al. (2021). Application of AI in recently emerged science of nanotoxicology is also being sought. The need for nanotoxicity databases, powerful nano descriptors, new modeling approaches, molecular mechanism analyses and designing of next generation nanomaterials are being debated ( Jha et al., 2014; Yan et al., 2023). U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) has recently initiated and AI program in Toxicology known as AI4TOX. This program mainly consists of four initiatives- AnimalGAN- to predict animal toxicology data for untested chemicals ( /about –fda/nctr-research-focus-areas/animalgan-initiative); SafetAI- to develop novel deep learning methods for toxicological endpoints (/about-fda/nctr-research-focus-areas/safetai-initiative); BERTox- to develop the most advanced AI powered Natural Language Processing (NPL) (/about-fda/nctr-research-focus-areas/bertox initiative) and PathologAI- to develop an effective and accurate framework for analysis of histopathological data from animal studies (/ about-fda/nctr-research-focus-areas/pathologai-initiative). Recently, Society of Toxicology (SOT) annual meeting held at Nashville from March 19-23, focused on a question-“How could AI be used for risk assessment?” There exists some skepticism weather AI may be used in human health risk assessment? How AI could be applied -to prioritize pharmaceutical/environmental chemicals, to identify potential off targets and decipher the mechanisms of toxicity and detect pathological effects? A Symposium session devoted to AI summarized international collaborative computational projects like CERaPP, COmPara and CATOMOS that have been designed to streamline the regulatory and safety assessments (Hartung, 2023). High throughput screening data (HTS) to predict drug induced liver injury (DILI) using AI is also being generated. AI can identify mechanisms for off target effects in drug development. AI can also be plausibly used to predict genotoxicity. Can AI tools automate the analysis of developmental or physiologically based assays? These discussions held during the symposium indicate exciting potential of AI in health risk assessment. It is speculated that, tools of nanotechnology hybridized with AI can metamorphose human health risk assessment to an extent that has never been achieved before.

Twenty years of in vitro nanotoxicology: how AI could make the difference

Pluripotent Stem Cells: an in Vitro Model for Nanotoxicity Assessments

In Silico Nanosafety Assessment Tools And Their Ecosystem-Level Integration Prospect

Nanotechnology and human health: risks and benefits

Artificial intelligence and machine learning disciplines with the potential to improve the nanotoxicology and nanomedicine fields: a comprehensive review

Advanced in silico characterization of nanomaterials for nanoparticle toxicology

Immunotoxicity of nanomaterials in health and disease: Current challenges and emerging approaches for identifying immune modifiers in susceptible populations

Application of Machine Learning in Nanotoxicology: A Critical Review and Perspective

Nanotoxicology for safe and sustainable nanotechnology

Practices and Trends of Machine Learning Application in Nanotoxicology

Bridging the gap: Innovative human-based in vitro approaches for nanomaterials hazard assessment and their role in safe and sustainable by design, risk assessment, and life cycle assessment

The State of the Art and Challenges of In Vitro Methods for Human Hazard Assessment of Nanomaterials in the Context of Safe-by-Design

Applying quantitative structure–activity relationship approaches to nanotoxicology: Current status and future potential

Hazard assessment of nanomaterials using in vitro toxicity assays: Guidance on potential assay interferences and mitigating actions to avoid biased results

Computational Nanotoxicology Models for Environmental Risk Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials

Metamorphosis of human health risk assessment with artificial intelligence (AI) - a new paradigm in pharmaco-toxicological sciences

Knowledge Gaps Between Nanotoxicological Research and Nanomaterial Safety

Nanosafety: a Perspective on Nano‐Bio Interactions

Sources Of Biases In The In Vitro Testing Of Nanomaterials: The Role Of Biomolecular Corona

Creative Use of Analytical Techniques and High-Throughput Technology to Facilitate Safety Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials

Predictive toxicological paradigm and high throughput approach for toxicity screening of engineered nanomaterials