Abstract:Introduction Temporomandibular disorders are a group of neuro-musculoskeletal disorders that have a multifaceted causation. The current study was a retrospective study undertaken to evaluate the outcome of different modalities of treatment provided in one office. Materials and methods Out of a cadre of 425 patients who had undergone TM joint treatment and had finished treatment at least 2 years before 2017, 171 patients were successfully recalled for the purpose of the study. The patients that were recalled were divided into groups based on the treatment they had received. The groups were 1. Splint only group. 2. Splint and Braces group. 3. Splint Braces and equilibration group, 4. Splint, Braces and Jaw surgery. 5. Splint braces Joint surgery and Jaw surgery. Pre-treatment Helkimo index scores of anamnestic score Ai, dysfunction scores Di were extracted from the medical records and compared to the Helkimo index scores at the time of recall appointments. Modification was made to the Helkimo index made to include the consistency of food the patient could eat without pain and was called the food index (Fi). This data was also extracted from the pre-treatment records and compared to the post treatment records. Data gathered was subjected to Pearson correlation and Kruskal Wallis analysis of variance. The test was considered significant at a p value of less than or equal to 0 .05. (95 percent confidence). Data was also gathered to evaluate the number of pain episodes post- treatment and compared to the per-treatment data from the chart. Results All patients treated in the group showed both clinical and statistical significance is all parameters of Ai. Di, and Fi scores. Acute exacerbation of pain was also reduced. Ai, Di, and Fi, scores showed most improvement in the groups that had Splint, braces and jaw surgery and the group Splint braces joint surgery and jaw surgery. Acute exacerbations of pain was also least in the aforementioned groups. Patients treated with splint only showed the most amount of acute exacerbation in pain. Another interesting observation in the study was that a linear relation was present between Ai and Fi with a nonlinear relation between Ai and Di, and Di and Fi, indicating that it is lack of pain and not the degree of mouth opening that is important that allows the patient to consume the hard and chewy foods. Conclusion 1. In our study all modalities of treatment gave an improvement in patient status pretreatment to post treatment periods. 2. Most relief was attained in the groups of Splint braces and jaw surgery and splint braces joint surgery and jaw surgery. 3. Linearity in relation between Ai and Fi, indicated that it is lack of pain and not the degree of mouth opening that allows patients to consume diet of chewy and hard consistency. 4. Although our study indicates that the surgical options gave the best results, surgical options should be considered after all options are tried. 5. Our study demonstrates TM joint problems cannot be cured but by controlling the contributing factors it can be managed very effectively.

Evaluation of Efficacy of 10% Dextrose Prolotherapy in Management of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: A Prospective Study

Evaluation of the effect of dextrose prolotherapy versus deep dry needling therapy for the treatment of temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement with reduction: (a randomized controlled trial)

Dextrose prolotherapy for pain and dysfunction of the TMJ reducible disc displacement: A randomized, double-blind clinical study

Botulinum Toxin Versus Dextrose Prolotherapy: Which is More Effective for Temporomandibular Joint Subluxation? A Randomized Clinical Trial

Application of auriculotemporal nerve block and dextrose prolotherapy in exercise therapy of TMJ closed lock in adolescents and young adults

Ultrasound Guided Vs Non‐Guided Prolotherapy for Internal Derangement of Temporomandibular Joint. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Treatment of temporomandibular disorders-Beyond splints

Dextrose neuroprolotherapy and occlusal splint treatment outcomes in occlusal trauma: Evaluation through ultrasound imaging

Low-Level Laser and TENS Therapy Assessment for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorder

Modified prolotherapy by 5% dextrose: Two years experiences of a traditional and complementary medicine practice center in Turkey

Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy on condylar position and myofascial pain in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders-A pilot clinical trial

Arthroscopic treatment of temporomandibular dysfunction: preliminary results from a prospective follow up of over five years

Randomized controlled trial of digital therapeutics for temporomandibular disorder: A pilot study

Comparative Efficacy of Non-Invasive Therapies in Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction: A Systematic Review

Peri-articular Dextrose Prolotherapy: Investigating the Effect of Injection Site on Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial

Assessing the Efficacy of Arthrocentesis in Managing Temporomandibular Joint Disorders and Internal Derangements: A Case Series

The Role of Supraerupted and Distoverted Maxillary Third Molars in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorder: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis using hypertonic dextrose vs other interventional treatments: systematic review of clinical trials

Does intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma/platelet-rich fibrin improve outcomes after temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effectiveness of Occlusal Splint Therapy in Moderating Temporomandibular Joint Disorders With Joint Displacement: A Retrospective Analysis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Evaluation of the effect of intra-articular injection of macrolide antibiotics versus corticosteroids on internal derangement of temporomandibular joint.