Use of prototype bi-nasal prongs for noninvasive ventilation in foals

Sharanne L Raidal,Michael van Diggelen,Chee Sum M Catanchin,Heidi S Lehmann,Chris T Quinn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17170
Abstract:Background: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) provides effective respiratory support in foals, but face masks are poorly tolerated and associated with hypercapnia. Bi-nasal prongs might be a more effective device interface in foals. Objectives: To compare bi-nasal prongs and masks for NIV in foals with pharmacologically induced respiratory insufficiency. Animals: Six healthy foals. Methods: In a randomized cross-over study, sedated foals received NIV delivered by mask or bi-nasal prongs, with the treatment repeated using the alternative device interface after a 3-day rest period. After periods of spontaneous ventilation through the allocated interface, with and without supplementary O2 (T2-T3), foals were subject to 10-minute treatment periods of NIV at different pressure support (5 or 10 cmH2O) and end-expiratory pressure settings (5 or 10 cmH2O), with and without supplementary O2 (T4-T7). Vital signs, arterial blood gases, spirometry, and gas exchange data were measured in the final 2 minutes of each treatment window. Results: Bi-nasal prongs were well tolerated and required less manual positioning or monitoring compared to the mask. Partial pressure of carbon dioxide did not increase during NIV with bi-nasal prongs and was lower than observed with masks (mean difference, 8.2 mmHg [95% confidence interval, 4.1-12.2 mmHg] at T6). Oxygenation and respiratory mechanics were improved in all foals and not different between device interfaces. Conclusions and clinical importance: Nasal prongs were well tolerated, had similar effects on respiratory function, and appeared to ameliorate hypercapnia observed previously during NIV in foals.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?