Efficacy of air cleaning units for preventing SARS-CoV-2 and other hospital-acquired infections on medicine for older people wards: a quasi-experimental controlled before-and-after study

R C Brock,R J B Goudie,C Peters,R Thaxter,T Gouliouris,C J R Illingworth,A Conway Morris,C B Beggs,M Butler,V L Keevil
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.017
2024-10-05
Abstract:Background: Nosocomial infections are costly, and airborne transmission is increasingly recognized as important for spread. Air cleaning units (ACUs) may reduce transmission, but little research has focused on their effectiveness on open wards. Aim: To assess whether ACUs reduce nosocomial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), or other, infections on older adult inpatient wards. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental before-and-after study on two intervention-control ward pairs in a UK teaching hospital. Infections were identified using routinely collected electronic health record data during 1 year of ACU implementation and the preceding year ('core study period'). Extended analyses included 6 months of additional data from one ward pair following ACU removal. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated through Cox regression controlling for age, sex, ward and background infection risk. The time that the ACUs were switched on was also recorded for Intervention Ward 2. Findings: ACUs were initially feasible, but compliance reduced towards the end of the study (average operation in first vs second half of ACU time on Intervention Ward 2: 77% vs 53%). In total, 8171 admissions for >48 h (6112 patients, median age 85 years) were included. Overall, the incidence of ward-acquired SARS-CoV-2 was 3.8%. ACU implementation was associated with a non-significant trend of lower hazard for SARS-CoV-2 infection [HR core study period 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-1.52; HR extended study period 0.78, 95% CI 0.53-1.14]. Only 1.5% of admissions resulted in other notable ward-acquired infections. Conclusion: ACUs may reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection to a clinically meaningfully degree. Larger studies could reduce uncertainty, perhaps using a crossover design, and factors influencing acceptability to staff and patients should be explored further.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?