Disulfiram ameliorates bone loss in ovariectomized mice by suppressing osteoclastogenesis

Tatsuyuki Fukui,Asuka Terashima,Yasunori Omata,Ryota Chijimatsu,Kazuo Okamoto,Masayuki Tsukasaki,Yukiko Fukuda,Tadayoshi Hayata,Akiyoshi Saitoh,Etsuko Toda,Hiroshi Takayanagi,Sakae Tanaka,Yuya Terashima,Taku Saito
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-024-01555-x
2024-10-07
Abstract:Introduction: Disulfiram (DSF), known as an anti-alcoholism drug, has been reported to suppress osteoclast differentiation in vitro; however, it remains uncertain whether DSF is effective in preventing osteoclastogenesis in vivo. This study aimed to investigate the effect of DSF administration in osteoporotic mice and its contribution to osteoclastogenesis in vivo. Materials and methods: The bone phenotype of ovariectomized mice, both treated and untreated with DSF, was examined using microcomputed tomography analysis. Osteoclastic and osteoblastic parameters were assessed through bone morphometric analysis. The direct effect of DSF on osteoblastogenesis in vitro was evaluated via a primary osteoblast culture experiment. The expression of genes related to DSF targets (Nup85, Ccr2, and Ccr5) in osteoclast-lineage cells was examined using scRNA-seq analysis and flow cytometry analysis using the bone marrow cells from ovariectomized mice. The impact of DSF on osteoclast-lineage cells was assessed using primary cultures of osteoclasts. Results: DSF administration ameliorated ovariectomy-induced bone loss and mitigated the increase of osteoclasts without affecting osteoblastogenesis. The scRNA-seq data revealed that osteoclast precursor cells expressed Nup85, Ccr2, and Ccr5. CCR2 and CCR5-positive cells in osteoclast precursor cells within bone marrow increased following ovariectomy, and this increase was canceled by DSF administration. Finally, we found that DSF had a significant inhibitory effect on osteoclastogenesis in the early stage by suppressing Tnfrsf11a expression. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that DSF could be a candidate for osteoporosis therapies because it suppresses osteoclastogenesis from an early stage in vivo.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?