Abstract:Complete reliance on the fitted model in response surface experiments is risky and relaxing this assumption, whether out of necessity or intentionally, requires an experimenter to account for multiple conflicting objectives. This work provides a methodological framework of a compound optimality criterion comprising elementary criteria responsible for: (i) the quality of the confidence region-based inference to be done using the fitted model (DP-/LP-optimality); (ii) improving the ability to test for the lack-of-fit from specified potential model contamination in the form of extra polynomial terms; and (iii) simultaneous minimisation of the variance and bias of the fitted model parameters arising from this misspecification. The latter two components have been newly developed in accordance with the model-independent 'pure error' approach to the error estimation. The compound criteria and design construction were adapted to restricted randomisation frameworks: blocked and multistratum experiments, where the stratum-by-stratum approach was adopted. A point-exchange algorithm was employed for searching for nearly optimal designs. The theoretical work is accompanied by one real and two illustrative examples to explore the relationship patterns among the individual components and characteristics of the optimal designs, demonstrating the attainable compromises across the competing objectives and driving some general practical recommendations.

A Bayesian Approach for Multiple Response Surface Optimization in the Presence of Noise Variables

Multi-response robust parameter design based on Bayesian mixed effects model

Bayesian multi-objective optimization of process design parameters in constrained settings with noise: an engineering design application

A Response Surface Based Hierarchical Approach to Multidisciplinary Robust Optimization Design

An Adaptive Response Surface Method Using Bayesian Metric and Model Bias Correction Function

Optimal response surface designs in the presence of model contamination

A Robust Interactive Desirability Function Approach for Multiple Response Optimization Considering Model Uncertainty

A Sequential Sampling-Based Bayesian Numerical Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization

Multiobjective Optimization Based on Response Surface Model and Its Application to Engineering Shape Design

Robust Optimization Using a Methodology Based on Cross Entropy Methods

Sequential Design for Ranking Response Surfaces

An Adaptive Response Surface Method for Crashworthiness Optimization

XU-RSM: Diffuse Response Surface Model for Reliability-Based Design Optimization

Robust multi-stage model-based design of optimal experiments for nonlinear estimation

Optimization of degree of conformance for multi‐response systems considering model imprecision: A data‐driven metaheuristic approach

A Hybrid Response Surface Method for Robust Design

Constraining the Feasible Design Space in Bayesian Optimization With User Feedback

ERGO-II: An Improved Bayesian Optimization Technique for Robust Design with Multiple Objectives, Failed Evaluations and Stochastic Parameters

Correlated multi‐response robust parameter design for different batches of products

A Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Approach Based on Gaussian Process Model

A Monte Carlo Based Robustness Optimization Method in New Product Design Process: A Case Study