Abstract:Automated bioacoustics methods can be a useful tool for monitoring insects and addressing pressing ecological and societal questions. Successful applications include assessing insect biodiversity, distribution and behaviour, as well as evaluating the effectiveness of restoration and pest control efforts. We recommend collaborations among ecologists and machine learning experts to increase model use by researchers and practitioners. Insects play vital ecological roles; many provide essential ecosystem services while others are economically devastating pests and disease vectors. Concerns over insect population declines and expansion have generated a pressing need to effectively monitor insects across broad spatial and temporal scales. A promising approach is bioacoustics, which uses sound to study ecological communities. Despite recent increases in machine learning technologies, the status of emerging automated bioacoustics methods for monitoring insects is not well known, limiting potential applications. To address this gap, we systematically review the effectiveness of automated bioacoustics models over the past four decades, analysing 176 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We describe their strengths and limitations compared to traditional methods and propose productive avenues forward. We found automated bioacoustics models for 302 insect species distributed across nine Orders. Studies used intentional calls (e.g. grasshopper stridulation), by‐products of flight (e.g. bee wingbeats) and indirectly produced sounds (e.g. grain movement) for identification. Pests were the most common study focus, driven largely by weevils and borers moving in dried food and wood. All disease vector studies focused on mosquitoes. A quarter of the studies compared multiple insect families. Our review illustrates that machine learning, and deep learning in particular, are becoming the gold standard for bioacoustics automated modelling approaches. We identified models that could classify hundreds of insect species with over 90% accuracy. Bioacoustics models can be useful for reducing lethal sampling, monitoring phenological patterns within and across days and working in locations or conditions where traditional methods are less effective (e.g. shady, shrubby or remote areas). However, it is important to note that not all insect taxa emit easily detectable sounds, and that sound pollution may impede effective recordings in some environmental contexts. Synthesis and applications: Automated bioacoustics methods can be a useful tool for monitoring insects and addressing pressing ecological and societal questions. Successful applications include assessing insect biodiversity, distribution and behaviour, as well as evaluating the effectiveness of restoration and pest control efforts. We recommend collaborations among ecologists and machine learning experts to increase model use by researchers and practitioners.

Ethical issues in lethal insect monitoring

Pursuing best practices for minimizing wild bee captures to support biological research

Standards and Best Practices for Monitoring and Benchmarking Insects

To Regulate or Not to Regulate? The Future of Animal Ethics in Experimental Research with Insects

Emerging technologies in citizen science and potential for insect monitoring

Ethical ecosurveillance: Mitigating the potential impacts on humans of widespread environmental monitoring

The Ethics of Biosurveillance

The State of Bee Monitoring in the United States: A Call to Refocus Away From Bowl Traps and Towards More Effective Methods

The Field Automatic Insect Recognition‐Device—A Non‐Lethal Semi‐Automatic Malaise Trap for Insect Biodiversity Monitoring: Proof of Concept

Killing squirrels: Exploring motivations and practices of lethal wildlife management

From buzzes to bytes: A systematic review of automated bioacoustics models used to detect, classify and monitor insects

Towards global insect biomonitoring with frugal methods

Ethical issues in field trials of genetically modified disease-resistant mosquitoes.

Citizen Science and Monitoring Forest Pests: a Beneficial Alliance?

Distance models reveal biases associated with passive trapping methods for measuring wild bee abundance

Systematic challenges and opportunities in insect monitoring: a Global South perspective

Towards holistic insect monitoring: species discovery, description, identification and traits for all insects

Towards a standardized framework for AI-assisted, image-based monitoring of nocturnal insects

Improving wild bee monitoring, sampling methods, and conservation

Methods for Monitoring Large Terrestrial Animals in the Wild

Insect pest monitoring with camera-equipped traps: strengths and limitations