Commentary: The Human Circadian Response to Light-Strong and Weak Resetting

R. Kronauer,M. Jewett,C. Czeisler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/074873049300800409
1993-12-01
Journal of Biological Rhythms
Abstract:The paper by Beersma and Daan (this issue) offers a reinterpretation of our data on the circadian phase-shifting effect of bright light on humans (Czeisler et al., 1989). In our view, Beersma and Daan misunderstand the mathematical basis of the relationship between type 0 and type I resetting, and inaccurately represent not only our data but the data of other investigators. We have organized our response so as to deal separately with the issues on which we disagree.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?