A morphological analysis of calcium hydroxylapatite and poly‐l‐lactic acid biostimulator particles
Alec D. McCarthy,Christian Hartmann,Alan Durkin,Shatil Shahriar,Saami Khalifian,Jingwei Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13764
2024-06-11
Skin Research and Technology
Abstract:Injectable fillers, pivotal in aesthetic medicine, have evolved significantly with recent trends favoring biostimulators like calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA‐CMC; Radiesse, Merz Aesthetics, Raleigh, NC) and poly‐l‐lactic acid (PLLA; Sculptra Aesthetics, Galderma, Dallas, TX). This study aims to compare the particle morphology of these two injectables and examine its potential clinical implications. Utilizing advanced light and scanning electron microscopy techniques, the physical characteristics of CaHA‐CMC and PLLA particles were analyzed, including shape, size, circularity, roundness, aspect ratio, and quantity of phagocytosable particles. The findings reveal several morphological contrasts: CaHA‐CMC particles exhibited a smooth, homogenous, spherical morphology with diameters predominantly ranging between 20 and 45 μm, while PLLA particles varied considerably in shape and size, appearing as micro flakes ranging from 2 to 150 μm in major axis length. The circularity and roundness of CaHA‐CMC particles were significantly higher compared to PLLA, indicating a more uniform shape. Aspect ratio analysis further underscored these differences, with CaHA‐CMC particles showing a closer resemblance to circles, unlike the more oblong PLLA particles. Quantification of the phagocytosable content of both injectables revealed a higher percentage of phagocytosable particles in PLLA. These morphological distinctions may influence the tissue response to each treatment. CaHA‐CMC's uniform, spherical particles may result in reduced inflammatory cell recruitment, whereas PLLA's heterogeneous particle morphology may evoke a more pronounced inflammatory response.
dermatology