Stereotactic body radiotherapy with a focal boost to the intraprostatic tumor for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: 5-year efficacy and toxicity in the hypo-FLAME trial

Cédric Draulans,Karin Haustermans,Floris J Pos,Uulke A van der Heide,Lisa De Cock,Jochem van der Voort van Zyp,Hans De Boer,Robert J Smeenk,Martina Kunze-Busch,Evelyn M Monninkhof,Robin De Roover,Sofie Isebaert,Linda G W Kerkmeijer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110568
Abstract:Background: The addition of an integrated focal boost to the intraprostatic lesion is associated with improved biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) in conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Furthermore, whole gland stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) demonstrated to be non-inferior to conventional radiotherapy for low- and intermediate-risk PCa. To investigate the combination of ultra-hypofractionated prostate SBRT with iso-toxic focal boosting for intermediate- and high-risk PCa, we performed the hypo-FLAME trial. Methods: Patients with intermediate- or high-risk PCa were enrolled in the phase II hypo-FLAME trial. All patients were treated with 35 Gy in 5 weekly fractions to the whole prostate gland with an iso-toxic integrated boost up to 50 Gy to the multiparametric MRI-defined tumor(s). If the dose constraints to the normal tissues would be exceeded, these were prioritised over the focal boost dose. The current analysis reports on the 5-year bDFS, late toxicity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Results: Between 2016 and 2018, 100 men were treated with a median follow-up of 61 months. The estimated 5-year bDFS (95 % CI) was 93 % (86 % to 97 %). At 5 years, the prevalence of grade 2 + genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity was 12 % and 4 %, respectively. Conclusion: Ultra-hypofractionated focal boost SBRT is associated with encouraging biochemical control rates up to 5-year follow-up in patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa. Furthermore, prostate SBRT with iso-toxic focal boosting is associated with acceptable late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity rates.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?