Abstract:The impact of the degree and effectiveness corporate social responsibility (CSR) fulfillment on corporate value assessment by investors is significant. However, prior research on effects of CSR on stock price crash risk has showed contrasting results. Certain studies suggest that an abundance of CSR can become a self-serving tool for management. This may lead to concealing and accumulating negative information, resulting in stock price collapse. Based on principal-agent theory, we suggest that CSR equilibrium could be an effective approach to prevent the concealment of negative events by managers. Employing data from Chinese A-share listed companies spanning 2010 to 2020, we examine how CSR equilibrium and corporate governance levels influence the risk of stock price collapse across entities with different property rights. Empirical findings indicate that a balanced distribution of CSR can mitigate the risk of stock price collapse. Furthermore, we find that higher levels of corporate governance can mitigate the negative impact of CSR equilibrium on stock price collapse risk. Interestingly, this governance effect is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises compared to private enterprises, where the likelihood of hiding adverse information is higher. Additionally, it provides a theoretical explanation for the impact of CSR equilibrium on the risk of stock price collapse, based on the principal-agent problem, thereby expanding the applicability of the theory. Practically, the research findings carry significant implications for listed companies, CSR rating agencies, and investors.

Balance matters more: Research on the effect of corporate social responsibility equilibrium on stock price crash risk

Stock Market Reaction To Data Breaches: The Moderating Role Of Corporate Social Responsibility

Corporate social responsibility dimensions and stock price crash risk: Evidence from the management's self-interest perspective

Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk: does analyst coverage matter?

Corporate social responsibility and stock-price crash risk: test of regulation mechanism based on institutional ownership and internal control

Do corporate social responsibility reduce crash risk of stock price: evidence from China

CSR decoupling and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China

Does corporate social responsibility affect stock liquidity? Evidence from China

Impact of CSR on stock return resilience during the 2020 public health emergency: Evidence from the Chinese financial market

Does stock price crash risk affect corporate social responsibility disclosure?

The effects of heterogeneous CSR on corporate stock performance: evidence from COVID-19 pandemic in China

Corporate Social Responsibility, Analyst Focus and Firm Performance

Research on the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Stock Price Risk

Can good ESG performance reduce stock price crash risk? Evidence from Chinese listed companies

Corporate social responsibility fulfilment, product-market competition and debt risk: Evidence from China

Corporate social responsibility, the cost of equity capital and ownership structure: An analysis of Chinese listed firms

Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Market Supervision, and Green Investment

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Impact on Corporate Risk-Taking? Evidence from Emerging Economy

Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and the cost of equity: Evidence from East Asia

Ownership Structure, Institutional Environment, and the Economic Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure: Evidence from Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts

Earnings Pressure and Corporate Social Responsibility Impression Management