Assessment of whole cartilage surface damage in an osteoarthritis rat model: The Cartilage Roughness Score (CRS) utilizing microcomputed tomography

Sami Kauppinen,David Fercher,Gonçalo Barreto,Ville-Pauli Karjalainen,Vesa Virtanen,Lucia Baixauli-Marin,Marina Fonti,Shipin Zhang,Tuomas Frondelius,Patrick Weber,Simo Saarakkala,Marcy Zenobi-Wong,Mikko A J Finnilä
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2024.09.008
2024-09-30
Abstract:Objective: This study aims to establish an accurate and robust imaging biomarker for pre-clinical osteoarthritis (OA) research, focusing on early detection of cartilage surface degeneration. Method: Using 50 male Wistar rats, this study aims to observe Collagenase-induced OA (CIOA) progression through microcomputed x-ray tomography (µCT), histopathological analysis, and gait analysis. A novel parameter, Cartilage Roughness Score (CRS), was developed for assessing cartilage structural damage from µCT data and was compared with histological OARSI Cartilage Degeneration Score (OARSI CDS). Additionally, as CRS maps the full surface, it was used to simulate the level of uncertainty in histological sampling. Results: CRS and OARSI CDS have a linear relationship. CRS for healthy cartilage is 2.75 (95% CI: 1.14-4.36), and with every 1 unit increase in OARSI, CRS is expected to increase by 0.64 (95% CI: 0.35-0.92). Cartilage degeneration due to CIOA was evident in both histopathological scoring and CRS. However, only CRS was sensitive enough to show consistent damage progression from day 10 to day 60. Furthermore, our simulation for histological sampling suggested that up to 16 coronal slices with 200 µm spacing would be needed to accurately represent the full extent of cartilage surface degeneration in a slice-wise manner. Gait analysis showed changes solely at eight days post-collagenase injection, normalizing by day 60. Conclusion: The CRS analysis method emerges as a robust tool for cartilage surface damage assessment. This study demonstrates the potential of automatic 3D analysis over the traditional 2D histological approach when evaluating cartilage surface damage.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?