Development of a Skin-Directed Scoring System for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Epidermal Necrolysis: A Delphi Consensus Exercise
Margo Waters,Allison Dobry,Stephanie T Le,Kanade Shinkai,Thomas M Beachkofsky,Mark D P Davis,Arturo R Dominguez,Daniela Kroshinsky,Alina Markova,Robert G Micheletti,Arash Mostaghimi,Helena B Pasieka,Misha Rosenbach,Lucia Seminario-Vidal,John Trinidad,Joerg Albrecht,Emily M Altman,Ryan Arakaki,Michael Ardern-Jones,Alina G Bridges,Adela R Cardones,Angad A Chadha,Jennifer K Chen,Steven T Chen,Kyle Cheng,Steven Daveluy,Katherine L DeNiro,Joanna Harp,Jesse J Keller,Brett King,Abraham M Korman,Eve J Lowenstein,Erin Luxenberg,Jennifer Brescoll Mancuso,Melissa M Mauskar,Philip Milam,Kiran Motaparthi,Caroline A Nelson,Cuong V Nguyen,Fnu Nutan,Alex G Ortega-Loayza,Tejesh Patel,Sahand Rahnama-Moghadam,Sergey Rekhtman,Nathan W Rojek,Mansi Sarihan,Sheila Shaigany,Timmie R Sharma,Sabrina M Shearer,Bridget E Shields,Lindsay C Strowd,Danielle M Tartar,Cristina Thomas,Karolyn A Wanat,Andrew C Walls,Lisa C Zaba,Carolyn M Ziemer,Emanual Maverakis,Benjamin H Kaffenberger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.1347
2023-07-01
Abstract:Importance: Scoring systems for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and epidermal necrolysis (EN) only estimate patient prognosis and are weighted toward comorbidities and systemic features; morphologic terminology for EN lesions is inconsistent. Objectives: To establish consensus among expert dermatologists on EN terminology, morphologic progression, and most-affected sites, and to build a framework for developing a skin-directed scoring system for EN. Evidence review: A Delphi consensus using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness criteria was initiated with a core group from the Society of Dermatology Hospitalists to establish agreement on the optimal design for an EN cutaneous scoring instrument, terminology, morphologic traits, and sites of involvement. Findings: In round 1, the 54 participating dermatology hospitalists reached consensus on all 49 statements (30 appropriate, 3 inappropriate, 16 uncertain). In round 2, they agreed on another 15 statements (8 appropriate, 7 uncertain). There was consistent agreement on the need for a skin-specific instrument; on the most-often affected skin sites (head and neck, chest, upper back, ocular mucosa, oral mucosa); and that blanching erythema, dusky erythema, targetoid erythema, vesicles/bullae, desquamation, and erosions comprise the morphologic traits of EN and can be consistently differentiated. Conclusions and relevance: This consensus exercise confirmed the need for an EN skin-directed scoring system, nomenclature, and differentiation of specific morphologic traits, and identified the sites most affected. It also established a baseline consensus for a standardized EN instrument with consistent terminology.