The 2023 European Task Force Criteria for Diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: Historical Background and Review of Main Changes

Francesca Graziano,Alessandro Zorzi,Simone Ungaro,Barbara Bauce,Ilaria Rigato,Alberto Cipriani,Martina Perazzolo Marra,Kalliopi Pilichou,Cristina Basso,Domenico Corrado

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2509348

2024-09-24

Abstract:Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a cardiac disease featured by non-ischemic myocardial scarring linked to ventricular electrical instability. As there is no single gold-standard test, diagnosing ACM remains challenging and a combination of specific criteria is needed. The diagnostic criteria were first defined and widespread in 1994 and then revised in 2010, approaching and focusing primarily on right ventricular involvement without considering any kind of left ventricular variant or phenotype. Years later, in 2020, with the purpose of overcoming previous limitations, the Padua Criteria were introduced by an international expert report. The main novel elements were the introduction of specific criteria for left ventricular variants as well as the use of cardiac magnetic resonance for tissue characterization and scar detection. The last modifications and refinement of these criteria were published at the end of 2023 as the European Task Force criteria, by a "head-quarter" of ACM international experts, proving the emerging relevance of this condition besides its difficult diagnosis. In this review, emphasizing the progress in understanding the aetiology of the cardiomyopathy, an analysis of the new criteria is presented. The introduction of the term "scarring/arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy" sets an important milestone in this field, underlying how non-ischemic myocardial scarring-typical of ACM-and arrhythmic susceptibility could be the main pillars of numerous different phenotypic variants regardless of etiology.