The American Approach to Anaesthesia

M. K. Sykes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4976.1148

1956-05-19

British Medical Journal

Abstract:Until very recent times the main training centres for anaesthesia were in the United States of America and in the United Kingdom. Historically, the foundations of anaesthesia were laid when the first successful operations were performed under ether anaesthesia in 1846 at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and University College Hospital, London. Although subsequentprogress has been along similar lines, the rapid growth of the American population and a geographical environment dissimilar to our own have resulted in a somewhat different approach to anaesthesia. This paper attempts to examine the factors which have led to these contrasts with British anaesthetic practice. The rapid expansion of the American population during the past century has been due both to a high birth rate and to immigration. Originally, most of the immigrants settling in the States were poor. Few profes sional persons moved with them, for there were adequate opportunities in the mother countries. The American medical schools' were insufficient to cope with the increasing demand for doctors, and consequently there was a persistent shortage. The present-day shortage is not apparent in the larger hospitals because they attract many postgraduate students for training. It does, however, affect the smaller hospitals, many of which rely on foreign doctors for junior staffing. Such foreign doctors are allowed to practise in most hospitals on a temporary licence basis, but their subsequent ass~imila tion presents many problems owing to their greatly varied background, temperament, and standard of training. It must be remembered also that many foreign doctors go to America for specialist training and then return home. A recent census' showed that 5,036 physicians from 84 countries trained in American hospitals as interns or residents during the academic year 1954-5. One-quarter of these came from Far Eastern countries, whilst nearly as large a number came from Latin America and Europe. The resultant general shortage is accentuated by two factors which cause maldistribution within the country. Firstly, there is a natural tendency for doctors to remain in the more highly populated areas where a closer contact can be maintained with other medical centres, and where practice is usually more lucrative. Despite the advan tage of a closely knit air-transport service, distance is a very real barrier to the spread of new ideas and developments in medicine. Secondly, climatic and topographical factors attract men to the more pleasant parts of the country. Both these problems exist in Great Britain, but they are much smaller in magnitude.