A Randomized Clinical Trial of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention
Sheila H. Ridner,Mary S. Dietrich,John Boyages,Louise Koelmeyer,Elisabeth Elder,T. Michael Hughes,James French,Nicholas Ngui,Jeremy Hsu,Vandana G. Abramson,Andrew Moore,Chirag Shah
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.12.21264773
2021-10-18
Abstract:Abstract Background This study compared rates of progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (defined as a ≥ 10% arm volume change from baseline requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP)) following an intervention for subclinical lymphedema (S-BCRL) triggered by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or by tape measurement (TM). Methods and Results This stratified, randomized, international trial enrolled new breast cancer patients undergoing: mastectomy/partial mastectomy, axillary treatment (dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy >6 nodes or radiation), radiation therapy (chest wall/ breast, supraclavicular fossa), or taxane-based chemotherapy. Following post-surgery eligibility reassessment, centralized, 1:1 randomization to prospective surveillance by BIS or TM occurred. S-BCRL detection triggered a 4-week, 12-hour per day, compression sleeve and gauntlet intervention. The primary outcome (n=209), rates of post-intervention progression to CDP, were assessed over three years. Between June 24, 2014 and September 11, 2018, 1,200 patients were enrolled, 963 randomized (BIS n=482;TM n=481) and 879 analyzed (BIS n=442;TM n=437). Median follow-up was 32.9 months (IQR=22,35). BIS patients triggered an intervention at a lower rate than TM patients (20.1%, n=89 vs 27.5%, n=120, p = 0.011). Median months to trigger was longer with BIS than TM (9.7; 95%CI,8.2-12.6 vs 3.9; 95%CI,2.8-4.5, p = 0.001). Overall, 14.4%(n=30) progressed post-intervention, with reduced likelihood for BIS patients than TM patients (7.9%, n=7 vs 19.2%, n=23; RR=0.41; 95%CI,0.13-0.81; absolute reduction 11.3%; 95%CI,2.3%-20.3%; p = 0.016). Conclusions As compared to TM, BIS provides a more precise identification of patients likely to benefit from an early compression intervention. Condensed Abstract This stratified, multi-site, international trial enrolled newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, randomized them to prospective surveillance by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or tape measurement (TM), and screened them for lymphedema development at frequent intervals for three years after surgery. When subclinical lymphedema was detected a 4-week, 12-hour per day, compression sleeve and gauntlet intervention was implemented. Overall, 14.4% (n=30) progressed post-intervention to chronic lymphedema, with reduced likelihood for BIS patients than TM patients (7.9%, n=7 vs 19.2%, n=23; RR=0.41; 95%-CI,0.13-0.81; absolute reduction 11.3%; 95%-CI,2.3%-20.3%; p = 0.016). BIS best supported intervention success for prevention of chronic lymphedema compared to TM.