The genus Gromphas Dejean, 1836 (Coleoptera, Scarabaeinae): nomenclature, distribution, and conservation, including a contribution to the debate on electronic publications in zoology
Mario Cupello
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5252/zoosystema2024v46a2
2024-02-09
Zoosystema
Abstract:Previously overlooked literature now brought to my attention has resulted in the following nomenclatural conclusions: 1) The species known since 2013 as Gromphas inermis Harold, 1869 must be called G. lacordairii (Oken, 1834), whose original combination was Coprobius lacordairii. Gromphas inermis is a new junior subjective synonym of G. lacordairii; 2) Gromphas was made available by Dejean, in 1836, not Brull, in 1837; the former, therefore, should be credited with the authorship; and 3) the type species of Gromphas is Coprobius lacordairii Oken, 1834 by original monotypy, not Onitis aerugionosus Perty, 1830 by subsequent monotypy. Also discussed is the publication year of G. jardim Cupello & Vaz-de-Mello, 2015. This leads me to address the problem of zoological works first published in electronic-only versions with their own pagination and which are later reissued integrated into a journals volume and repaginated. It is here argued that these two versions the detached and the volume-integrated ones should be deemed separate available works, and that new nomenclatural acts can be made available from detached versions. If this is accepted, the later publication of the volume-integrated versions has no bearing on the availability of the earlier detached versions. I also introduce new data on the type series of Onitis aeruginosus (currently, Gromphas aerugionosa) and G. inermis, new specimens of the rare G. jardim, mislabelled specimens of G. amazonica Bates, 1870, and newly discovered specimens of the vanished G. dichroa Blanchard, 1846. The latter include the new record from Santa Catarina state, Brazil. The disappearance of G. dichroa since 1954, including the possibility that it might be extinct, is discussed. Le genre Gromphas Dejean, 1836 (Coleoptera, Scarabaeinae): nomenclature, distribution et conservation, avec une contribution au dbat sur les publications lectroniques en zoologie. La littrature prcdemment ignore et maintenant porte mon attention a abouti aux conclusions nomenclaturales suivantes: 1) lespce connue depuis 2013 sous le nom de Gromphas inermis Harold, 1869 doit tre appele G. lacordairii (Oken, 1834), dont la combinaison originale tait Coprobius lacordairii. Gromphas inermis est un nouveau synonyme subjectif junior de G. lacordairii; 2) Gromphas a t rendu disponible par Dejean, en 1836, et non par Brull, en 1837; cest donc le premier qui doit tre crdit de la paternit; 3) lespce type de Gromphas est Coprobius lacordairii Oken, 1834 selon la monotypie originale, et non Onitis aerugionosus Perty, 1830 selon la monotypie ultrieure. Lanne de publication de G. jardim Cupello & Vaz-de-Mello, 2015, est galement discute. Ceci mamne aborder le problme des travaux zoologiques publis pour la premire fois en version lectronique avec leur propre pagination et qui sont ensuite rdits, intgrs dans le volume dune revue et repagins. Largument avanc ici est que ces deux versions la version dtache et la version intgre au volume devraient tre considres comme des uvres disponibles distinctes, et que de nouveaux actes nomenclaturaux peuvent tre rendus disponibles partir des versions dtaches. Si lon accepte ce point de vue, la publication ultrieure des versions intgres au volume na aucune incidence sur la disponibilit des versions dtaches antrieures. Je prsente galement de nouvelles donnes sur les sries types dOnitis aeruginosus (prsentement Gromphas aerugionosa) et de G. inermis, de nouveaux spcimens du rare G. jardim, des spcimens mal tiquets de G. amazonica Bates, 1870 et des spcimens nouvellement dcouverts de G. dichroa Blanchard, 1846, qui a disparu. Ces derniers comprennent le nouveau signalement de ltat de Santa Catarina, Brsil. La disparition de G. dichroa depuis 1954, y compris la possibilit quil soit teint, est discute.
zoology