Rapidly rotating or not?

May Chiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02234-7
IF: 14.1
2024-03-21
Nature Astronomy
Abstract:Evolved stars are expected to rotate, but ALMA observations of a dipolar velocity field at Betelgeuse suggest an extremely rapid rotation rate of 5.47 ± 0.25 km s -1 , which is two orders of magnitude faster than predicted. Ma et al. test whether the dipolar structure could come from a nonrotating star instead. For instance, two large surface convective cells moving in opposite directions could mimic the effect, as would smaller cells moving coherently and starting from greater depths. The authors develop a postprocessing package for synthetic SiO spectra and ALMA images. Their produced radial velocity maps show that 90% of single-epoch observations of a nonrotating star can be falsely interpreted as evidence for rotation rates of 2 km s -1 or higher. With the current resolution of ALMA, it is not possible to distinguish between the three cases of rapid rotation, two large convective cells or smaller coherent cells. But a factor of two increase in spatial resolution would be sufficient to do so, especially with additional epochs. It looks like Betelgeuse will remain under watch.
astronomy & astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?