Magnetic Resonance Imaging‐Based Radiomics Nomogram for Prediction of the Histopathological Grade of Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Two‐Center Study
Ruixin Yan,Dapeng Hao,Jie Li,Jihua Liu,Feng Hou,Haisong Chen,Lisha Duan,Chencui Huang,Hexiang Wang,Tengbo Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27532
IF: 4.4
2021-02-18
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Preoperative prediction of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) grade is important for treatment decisions. Therefore, formulation an STS grade model is strongly needed.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>To develop and test an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐based radiomics nomogram for predicting the grade of STS (low‐grade vs. high grade).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Study Type</h3><p>Retrospective</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Population</h3><p>One hundred and eighty patients with STS confirmed by pathologic results at two independent institutions were enrolled (training set, <i>N</i> = 109; external validation set, <i>N</i> = 71). </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Field Strength/Sequence</h3><p>Unenhanced T1‐weighted (T1WI) and fat‐suppressed T2‐weighted images (FS‐T2WI) were acquired at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Assessment</h3><p>Clinical‐MRI characteristics included age, gender, tumor‐node‐metastasis (TNM) stage, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, progression‐free survival (PFS), and MRI morphological features (ie, margin). Radiomics feature extraction were performed on T1WI and FS‐T2WI images by minimum redundancy maximum relevance (MRMR) method and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. The selected features constructed three radiomics signatures models (RS‐T1, RS‐FST2, and RS‐Combined). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were applied for screening significant risk factors. Radiomics nomogram was constructed by incorporating the radiomics signature and risk factors.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Statistical Tests</h3><p>Clinical‐MRI characteristics were performed by a univariate analysis. Model performances (discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness) were validated in the external validation set. The RS‐T1 model, RS‐FST2 model, and RS‐Combined model had an area under curves (AUCs) of 0.645, 0.641, and 0.829, respectively, in the external validation set. The radiomics nomogram, incorporating significant risk factors and the RS‐Combined model had AUCs of 0.916 (95%CI, 0.866–0.966, training set) and 0.879 (95%CI, 0.791–0.967, external validation set), and demonstrated good calibration and good clinical utility.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Data Conclusion</h3><p>The proposed noninvasive MRI‐based radiomics models showed good performance in differentiating low‐grade from high‐grade STSs.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Level of Evidence</h3><p>3</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Technical Efficacy Stage</h3><p>2</p></section>
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging