Can early precut reduce post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in patients with difficult bile duct cannulation?

Tomohiro Tanikawa,Keisuke Miyake,Mayuko Kawada,Katsunori Ishii,Takashi Fushimi,Noriyo Urata,Nozomu Wada,Ken Nishino,Mitsuhiko Suehiro,Miwa Kawanaka,Hidenori Shiraha,Ken Haruma,Hirofumi Kawamoto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i9.519

2024-09-16

Abstract:Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is associated with a variety of adverse events (AEs). One of the most important AEs is post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), which is most common in cases of difficult biliary cannulation. Although the precut technique has been reported as a PEP risk factor, recent studies indicate that early precut could reduce PEP, and that precut itself is not a risk factor. Aim: To evaluate the safety of the precut technique, especially in terms of PEP. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study, spanning the period from November 2011 through December 2021. It included 1556 patients, aged ≥ 20 years, who underwent their initial ERCP attempt for biliary disease with a naïve papilla at the Kawasaki University General Medical Center. We compared the PEP risk between the early precut and the delayed precut group. Results: The PEP incidence rate did not significantly differ between the precut and non-precut groups. However, the PEP incidence was significantly lower in the early precut group than the delayed precut group (3.5% vs 10.5%; P = 0.02). The PEP incidence in the delayed precut group without pancreatic stent insertion (17.3%) was significantly higher compared to other cases (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that early precut may reduce PEP incidence. If the precut decision is delayed, a pancreatic stent should be inserted to prevent PEP.