P663 Efficacy of jak inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease patients with extraintestinal manifestations– Retrospective study
M Livne Margolin,Y González Lama2,I Koutroubakis,I Drygiannakis,A Shitrit,R Goldenberg,K Farkas,T Molnar,E Ivány,A Amiot,F Carbonnel,P Girod,G Doherty,B Mateescu,S Ben-Horin1,U Kopylov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0793
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background JAK inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn’s disease (CD), and inflammatory arthritis. However, limited data exist on their effectiveness in treating extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in real-world scenarios. This multicenter, retrospective study aims to assess the efficacy of JAK inhibitors (JAKI), specifically tofacitinib or upadacitinib, in IBD patients with EIM. Methods This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Inclusion criteria included IBD patients with active EIM documented before JAKI treatment initiation, with a follow-up up to 52 weeks. EIM Clinical response was defined as either improvement or remission of EIM complaints, as subjectively described by the patient or taken from the treating physician’s assessment. Results Eighty-six patients from eight centers were included, with 64% having UC (n=55). Women constituted 60% of the patients (n=51). Tofacitinib and upadacitinib were administered to 63% (n=54/86) and 36% (n=32/86) of patients, respectively. Eleven patients (13%) were biologically naïve, all treated with tofacitinib. Arthralgia was the predominant complaint, affecting 55% (n=30/54) of tofacitinib-treated and 44% (n=14/32) of upadacitinib-treated patients. Patient characteristics, including EIM distribution, are detailed in Table 1. At 3 months, 86% (n=72/83) achieved EIM clinical response, with tofacitinib responders at 94% (n=49/52) compared to 74% (n=23/31) for upadacitinib (p=0.01). Seven percent (n=6) discontinued treatment due to lack of response. Peripheral arthralgia improved or achieved remission in 86% (n=32/38) of patients, while 68% (n=13/19) with axial arthropathy experienced clinical response. At 6 months, EIM clinical response was achieved by 76% (n=44/75), with tofacitinib at 86% (n=44/51) and upadacitinib at 54% (n=13/24) (p=0.004). Twelve percent(n=10) discontinued treatment due to loss of response. Peripheral arthralgia responded in 86% (n=31/36), and axial arthropathy responded in 42% (n=8/19). At 12 months, 65% (n=44/68) of patients improved or had remission, with tofacitinib responders at 73% (n=35/48) and upadacitinib responders at 45% (n=9/20) (p<0.05). Eighty-eight percent (n=23/26) with peripheral arthralgia and 50% (n=5/10) with axial arthropathy achieved clinical response. Conclusion This study demonstrates the effectiveness of JAK inhibitors in treating EIM, with a high percentage of responders. Tofacitinib appears more effective than upadacitinib, possibly influenced by a higher proportion of biologically experienced patients and differences in IBD subtype distribution between the two groups, with upadacitinib mainly used in CD patients and tofacitinib in UC patients.
gastroenterology & hepatology