Cardiac transplantation--the need for prospective, randomized, controlled investigations.

D. Renlund,M. Bristow,J. O’Connell
1988-11-01
Western Journal of Medicine
Abstract:IN THIS ISSUE OF THE WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, the aspects of cardiac transplantation that are critical to successful outcomes are discussed succinctly and in depth. Recipient and donor selection, allograft rejection immunoprophylaxis, the treatment of allograft rejection, and the management of infectious and late complications, such as allograft coronary artery disease, have been and remain the key issues of this complex treatment modality for end-stage heart disease. While expertise with the actual surgical procedure is an absolute requisite for success, it is nonetheless inadequate to guarantee shortand long-term survival. Because surgical mortality is less than 1 % and the leading causes of death are infection, rejection, and allograft coronary artery disease, 1-4 future progress clearly depends on the refinement of the nonsurgical aspects of cardiac transplantation. The evolution of cardiac transplantation to its present status as an accepted treatment option in selected patients with end-stage heart disease5'6 depended on medical and surgical progress from the late 1960s to the present. During that time, most reported studies were from a single institution, were retrospective, and were uncontrolled or historically controlled. Despite these drawbacks, these investigations furthered the science and art of transplantation to the point that survival became routine."'2 The lack of randomized, prospective, controlled study methods and other factors, however, have led to a lack ofuniformity in immunosuppressive protocols and have generated additional controversies in cardiac transplantation. In this communication, we discuss the complexities, controversies, and issues involved in recipient selection, immunosuppression, and governmental involvement in cardiac transplantation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?