Head to head comparison of 18F-FDG and Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging used in diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic diseases

Yuan Li,Yunshan Zhou,Jing He,Jinchuan Chen,Hua Zhu,Zhi Yang,Qian Wang,Nan Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-07155-4
Abstract:Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the performance of radionuclide-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04) PET/CT in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) and compare it with fluorine-18 (18F) labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging. Methods: Fifty-eight participants with ARDs were prospectively enrolled from April 2022 to February 2024 and underwent dual-tracer PET/CT imaging. For both 18F-FDG and Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT, imaging findings were interpreted and compared. The clinical significance was compared between18F-FDG PET/CT and Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging. Results: 18F-FDG imaging was positive in 53 out of 58 cases (91.4%) while Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 imaging was positive in 55 out of 58 cases (94.8%). Overall positive rate of Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 imaging was as high as 18F-FDG imaging (P = 0.625). 18F-FDG imaging detected more lesions in lymph node, spleen, and bone marrow. Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 imaging detected more lesions in the lung, muscle, and tendon/ligament. There was no statistical difference of composing ratio of grades of clinical significance between two imaging modalities (χ2 = 2.875, P = 0.238). The superior rate of Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging was higher than 18F-FDG imaging (P = 0.020). In subgroup of adult-onset Still's disease, 18F-FDG imaging showed better performance than Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 imaging. In most of the other subgroup of ARDs, Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging overperformed 18F-FDG imaging. Conclusion: Both 18F-FDG and Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging have excellent sensitivity in ARDs. The detection capabilities of two tracers varied according to the involving organs of ARDs. In most of ARDs except adult-onset Still's disease, Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging overperformed 18F-FDG imaging. Key Points • 18F-FDG and Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging have excellent sensitivity in diagnosing of ARDs. • 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging detected more lesions in lymph node, spleen, and bone marrow. • 18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging detected more lesions in the lung, muscle, and tendon/ligament. • 18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging overperformed18F-FDG in most subgroups of ARDs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?