Effects of probiotics supplementation on glycemic profile in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A grade-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Najmeh Hejazi,Hamid Ghalandari,Raha Rahmanian,Fatemeh Haghpanah,Maede Makhtoomi,Amirhossein Asadi,Moein Askarpour
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.09.014
2024-09-28
Abstract:Background: Disturbed glycemia and the resulting type 2 diabetes (T2D) are significant health concerns. Various approaches have been examined to improve glycemic control in patients with T2D. Modification of gut microbiome via administering probiotics has been extensively studied. The present study aims to sum up the existing literature which investigated the effect of probiotics on glycemic indices in individuals with T2D in the format of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: Online medical databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched from inception to January 2024. Eligible studies were included using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcome variables included fasting blood sugar (FBS), insulin, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and homeostatic model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Weighted mean differences (WMDs) were estimated. Subgroup and dose-response analyses were conducted. P-values <0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Results: Out of 5636 records retrieved by the initial search, thirty-two RCTs were included in the final analyses. Supplementation with probiotics was observed to significantly improve indices of glycemic control; including FBS (WMD: -13.27 mg/dl; 95 % CI: -18.31, -8.22), HbA1c (WMD: -0.44 %; 95 % CI: -0.59, -0.28), insulin (WMD: -1.33 μIU/ml; 95 % CI: -2.57, -0.08), and HOMA-IR (WMD: -0.95; 95 % CI: -1.71, -0.18). Dose-response analysis revealed that increased duration of intervention results in a larger reduction only in FBS. Conclusion: Supplementation with probiotics seems to improve indices of glycemic control. Nonetheless, taken into account the notable heterogeneity (with regard to dosage, duration, and the species/strains used) between the included studies and low quality of evidence, caution must be considered, especially when long-term clinical implications are intended.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?