Thyroid hormones do not alter rat brain benzodiazepine receptor function in‐vivo

C. Atterwill,D. Nutt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1983.tb02893.x
1983-11-01
Abstract:reference) are similar (Horn & Rodgers 1976). Further, a bimethylene chain projects in front of the aromatic plane when this is orientated in relation to the heterocyclic ring as it is in the benzomorphan (see views looking down on the molecules). In the dextro antipodal forms, projection of heterocyclic carbons in front of the aromatic plane is less extensive and this difference may be a key factor in determining the degree of interaction with the opiate receptor either in the provision of binding sites (perhaps to fit the ‘cavity’ originally proposed in 1954 by Beckett & Casy) or avoidance of a receptor area intolerant to non-polar elements. An alternative model for (-)-I and (-)-I1 is the 1-aza analogue of the benzomorphan of Fig. 1 (with N and C-1 interchanged) which, as.a racemate, has a half to a third the potency of pethidine in mice antinociceptive tests and is significantly active in a binding assay (Iorio & Casy 1975; Iorio & Klee unpublished results). These facts demonstrate that the anionic site of the opiate receptor herein involved has some degree of tolerance to the siting of the cationic centre of the ligand (Fries & Portoghese 1976). We thank Mr K. Schellekens (Janssen Pharmaceutica) for the pharmacological data, Dr T. G. Goodburn (Warner Lambert-Parke Davis) for supply of (-)-I as succinate, and Dr G. F. Laws for preparing (-)-I HBr.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?