[Colorectal cancer screening: reaffirming the past and resolutely advancing toward the future].

A. Castells

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2013.12.001

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Disparate Impact of Artificial Intelligence Bias in Ridehailing Economy's Price Discrimination Algorithms

Akshat Pandey,Aylin Caliskan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462561

2021-05-04

Abstract:Ridehailing applications that collect mobility data from individuals to inform smart city planning predict each trip's fare pricing with automated algorithms that rely on artificial intelligence (AI). This type of AI algorithm, namely a price discrimination algorithm, is widely used in the industry's black box systems for dynamic individualized pricing. Lacking transparency, studying such AI systems for fairness and disparate impact has not been possible without access to data used in generating the outcomes of price discrimination algorithms. Recently, in an effort to enhance transparency in city planning, the city of Chicago regulation mandated that transportation providers publish anonymized data on ridehailing. As a result, we present the first large-scale measurement of the disparate impact of price discrimination algorithms used by ridehailing applications. The application of random effects models from the meta-analysis literature combines the city-level effects of AI bias on fare pricing from census tract attributes, aggregated from the American Community Survey. An analysis of 100 million ridehailing samples from the city of Chicago indicates a significant disparate impact in fare pricing of neighborhoods due to AI bias learned from ridehailing utilization patterns associated with demographic attributes. Neighborhoods with larger non-white populations, higher poverty levels, younger residents, and high education levels are significantly associated with higher fare prices, with combined effect sizes, measured in Cohen's d, of -0.32, -0.28, 0.69, and 0.24 for each demographic, respectively. Further, our methods hold promise for identifying and addressing the sources of disparate impact in AI algorithms learning from datasets that contain U.S. geolocations.

Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence,Machine Learning
Unveiling and Mitigating Bias in Ride-Hailing Pricing for Equitable Policy Making

Nripsuta Ani Saxena,Wenbin Zhang,Cyrus Shahabi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.03489

2023-01-10

Abstract:Ride-hailing services have skyrocketed in popularity due to the convenience they offer, but recent research has shown that their pricing strategies can have a disparate impact on some riders, such as those living in disadvantaged neighborhoods with a greater share of residents of color or residents below the poverty line. Since these communities tend to be more dependent on ride-hailing services due to lack of adequate public transportation, it is imperative to address this inequity. To this end, this paper presents the first thorough study on fair pricing for ride-hailing services by devising applicable fairness measures and corresponding fair pricing mechanisms. By providing discounts that may be subsidized by the government, our approach results in an increased number and more affordable rides for the disadvantaged community. Experiments on real-world Chicago taxi data confirm our theoretical findings which provide a basis for the government to establish fair ride-hailing policies.

Computers and Society
A Balancing Act of Regulating On-Demand Ride Services

Jiayi Joey Yu,Christopher S. Tang,Zuo-Jun Max Shen,Xiqun Michael Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3351

IF: 5.4

2020-01-01

Management Science

Abstract:Regulating on-demand ride-hailing services (e.g., Uber and DiDi) requires a balance of multiple competing objectives: encouraging innovative business models (e.g., DiDi), sustaining traditional industries (e.g., taxi), creating new jobs, and reducing traffic congestion. This study is motivated by a regulatory policy implemented by the Chinese government in 2017 and a similar policy approved by the New York City Council in 2018 that regulate the “maximum” number of registered Uber/DiDi drivers. We examine the impact of these policies on the welfare of different stakeholders (i.e., consumers, taxi drivers, on-demand ride service company, and independent drivers). By analyzing a two-period dynamic game that involves these stakeholders, we find that, without government intervention, the on-demand ride service platform can drive the traditional taxi industry out of the market under certain conditions. Relative to no regulations and a complete ban policy, a carefully designed regulatory policy can strike a better balance of multiple competing objectives. Finally, if a government can reform the taxi industry by adjusting the taxi fare, then lowering the taxi fare instead of imposing a strict policy toward on-demand ride services can improve the total social welfare. This paper was accepted by Serguei Netessine, operations management.
Evaluating Fairness in Black-box Algorithmic Markets: A Case Study of Ride Sharing in Chicago

Yuhan Liu,Yuhan Zheng,Siyuan Zhang,Lydia T. Liu

2024-07-30

Abstract:This study examines fairness within the rideshare industry, focusing on both drivers' wages and riders' trip fares. Through quantitative analysis, we found that drivers' hourly wages are significantly influenced by factors such as race/ethnicity, health insurance status, tenure to the platform, and working hours. Despite platforms' policies not intentionally embedding biases, disparities persist based on these characteristics. For ride fares, we propose a method to audit the pricing policy of a proprietary algorithm by replicating it; we conduct a hypothesis test to determine if the predicted rideshare fare is greater than the taxi fare, taking into account the approximation error in the replicated model. Challenges in accessing data and transparency hinder our ability to isolate discrimination from other factors, underscoring the need for collaboration with rideshare platforms and drivers to enhance fairness in algorithmic wage determination and pricing.

Human-Computer Interaction
Disparities in ridesourcing demand for mobility resilience: A multilevel analysis of neighborhood effects in Chicago, Illinois

Elisa Borowski,Jason Soria,Joseph Schofer,Amanda Stathopoulos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.15889

2020-10-30

Abstract:Mobility resilience refers to the ability of individuals to complete their desired travel despite unplanned disruptions to the transportation system. The potential of new on-demand mobility options, such as ridesourcing services, to fill unpredicted gaps in mobility is an underexplored source of adaptive capacity. Applying a natural experiment approach to newly released ridesourcing data, we examine variation in the gap-filling role of on-demand mobility during sudden shocks to a transportation system by analyzing the change in use of ridesourcing during unexpected rail transit service disruptions across the racially and economically diverse city of Chicago. Using a multilevel mixed model, we control not only for the immediate station attributes where the disruption occurs, but also for the broader context of the community area and city quadrant in a three-level structure. Thereby the unobserved variability across neighborhoods can be associated with differences in factors such as transit ridership, or socio-economic status of residents, in addition to controlling for station level effects. Our findings reveal that individuals use ridesourcing as a gap-filling mechanism during rail transit disruptions, but there is strong variation across situational and locational contexts. Specifically, our results show larger increases in transit disruption responsive ridesourcing during weekdays, nonholidays, and more severe disruptions, as well as in community areas that have higher percentages of White residents and transit commuters, and on the more affluent northside of the city. These findings point to new insights with far-reaching implications on how ridesourcing complements existing transport networks by providing added capacity during disruptions but does not appear to bring equitable gap-filling benefits to low-income communities of color that typically have more limited mobility options.

Physics and Society,General Economics,Applications
Comparative Analysis of Usage Patterns and Underlying Determinants for Ride-hailing and Traditional Taxi Services: A Chicago Case Study

Zhiqi Wang,Yufeng Zhang,Bin Jia,Ziyou Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103912

IF: 6.615

2023-12-04

Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice

Abstract:As app-based ride-hailing (or e-hailing) services have achieved great success worldwide, the traditional taxi industry faces an unprecedented crisis. To gain a deeper understanding of these two distinct modes that both offer door-to-door mobility services, in this study, we use Chicago as a case to comparatively analyze the travel patterns of the app-based ride-hailing and traditional taxi services and understand how socio-demographic and urban land use attributes affect the usage of two services in temporal and spatial dimensions. We employ the local regression models named geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR) models that can capture the spatiotemporal nonstationarity between variables as the primary analysis tool. Four GTWR models that predict the average hourly taxi or ride-hailing trip volume on weekdays or weekends for each community area are carefully constructed with R^2 all above 0.98. The nonstationarity test shows all variables exhibit extra local variations, indicating the necessity of using the GTWR models to explore the attributes' spatiotemporal impacts. Spatial error models (SEM) and ordinary least square (OLS) models, global regression models, are also built as comparisons and benchmark references. The differences between global and local regression models are illustrated through clustering analysis. To compare and contrast the usage patterns of ride-hailing and taxi services, we analyze the temporal-spatially varying coefficients of GTWR models. Interpretations are provided for our interesting findings, including the strong trip generation power of the population in the South Side area, the attitude of white people towards taxi services is positive but ambiguous towards ride-hailing services, young people's opposing behaviors towards taxi services on weekdays and weekends, and the opposite relationship between transit and taxi or ride-hailing in certain areas. Based on these key findings, we offer some planning and operational suggestions, such as developing mobile apps, implementing price-related strategies, strengthening partnerships with local businesses, building multi-modal transportation, clarifying customer segmentation, providing auxiliary services, etc.

transportation,transportation science & technology,economics
Exploring the Tradeoff Between System Profit and Income Equality Among Ride-hailing Drivers

Evan Yifan Xu,Pan Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.15170

2024-02-13

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

Abstract:This paper examines the income inequality among rideshare drivers resulting from discriminatory cancellations by riders, considering the impact of demographic factors such as gender, age, and race. We investigate the tradeoff between income inequality, referred to as the fairness objective, and system efficiency, known as the profit objective. To address this issue, we propose an online bipartite-matching model that captures the sequential arrival of riders according to a known distribution. The model incorporates the notion of acceptance rates between driver-rider types, which are defined based on demographic characteristics. Specifically, we analyze the probabilities of riders accepting or canceling their assigned drivers, reflecting the level of acceptance between different rider and driver types. We construct a bi-objective linear program as a valid benchmark and propose two LP-based parameterized online algorithms. Rigorous analysis of online competitive ratios is conducted to illustrate the flexibility and efficiency of our algorithms in achieving a balance between fairness and profit. Furthermore, we present experimental results based on real-world and synthetic datasets, validating the theoretical predictions put forth in our study.

computer science, artificial intelligence
Scale effects in ridesplitting: A case study of the City of Chicago

Hao Liu,Saipraneeth Devunuri,Lewis Lehe,Vikash V. Gayah

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103690

2023-05-05

Abstract:Ridesplitting – a type of ride-hailing in which riders share vehicles with other riders – has become a common travel mode in some major cities. This type of shared ride option is currently provided by transportation network companies (TNCs) such as Uber, Lyft, and Via and has attracted increasing numbers of users, particularly before the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous findings have suggested ridesplitting can lower travel costs and even lessen congestion by reducing the number of vehicles needed to move people. Recent studies have also posited that ridesplitting should experience positive feedback mechanisms in which the quality of the service would improve with the number of users. Specifically, these systems should benefit from economies of scale and increasing returns to scale. This paper demonstrates evidence of their existence using trip data reported by TNCs to the City of Chicago between January and September 2019. Specifically, it shows that increases in the number of riders requesting or authorizing shared trips during a given time period is associated with shorter trip detours, higher rates of riders being matched together, lower costs relative to non-shared trips, and higher willingness for riders to share trips.

transportation,transportation science & technology,economics
Taxing ride‐sharing: Which neighborhoods pay more?

Mario Leccese

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12704

2024-04-26

Journal of Regional Science

Abstract:I examine the short‐run impact of taxing ride‐sharing trips on the price and usage of ride‐sharing across different neighborhoods of Chicago and investigate whether the tax had unequal effects on neighborhoods with different racial compositions. I document significant heterogeneity in price increases due to the tax across neighborhoods of departure, showing that this was correlated with their differential access to alternatives to ride‐sharing, such as public transit. Clustering neighborhoods based on their racial composition reveals that Black areas experienced particularly high price increases and reductions in usage. Overall, the burden of the tax fell more heavily on minority‐concentrated areas.

economics,environmental studies,regional & urban planning
Impact of Ride-Hailing Services on Transportation Mode Choices: Evidence from Traffic and Transit Ridership

Kyunghee Lee,Qianran (Jenny) Jin,Animesh Animesh,Jui Ramaprasad,,,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2022/15707

IF: 7.3

2022-12-01

MIS Quarterly

Abstract:The rise of technology-enabled ride-hailing services has affected individuals’ transportation-related decisions. The impact of these ride-hailing services likely varies across traveler segments that differ in their usage of various modes of transportation. In this paper, we develop and leverage a framework that allows us to examine the impact of ride-hailing services on the transportation mode choice for three traveler segments: drivers (who primarily use a personal automobile to travel), riders (who primarily use public transit to travel), and walkers (who primarily use non-motorized modes of transport). We first develop a framework outlining how the behavior of different traveler segments would be impacted by the introduction of ride-hailing services and show how this affects traffic congestion and public transportation ridership. To test the framework, we compiled a rich dataset, combining data on public transportation ridership, traffic congestion, and individual transportation mode choice. Employing a difference-in-differences methodology, we show that the Uber entry in a market enabled those who were walkers and riders prior to the entry of Uber to travel more conveniently, leading to an increase in traffic congestion, and induced those who were drivers to substitute their use of private automobiles with a combination of Uber and public transit. We introduced urban compactness to assess the heterogeneous impact of ride-hailing services for cities that differ in their distribution of traveler segments. We found that Uber entry increases traffic congestion and reduces public transit demand more in cities with higher levels of urban compactness, i.e., where the proportion of riders and walkers is higher than that of drivers. This work provides a holistic framework to understand the mechanism underlying the impact of ride-hailing services on public transit and traffic congestion. Urban planners and policy makers can leverage our framework, methodology, and empirical results to guide city planning decisions that have implications for sustainability.

information science & library science,management,computer science, information systems
Transportation Technology and Gentrification: Evidence from the entry of Ridesharing Services

Sumit Agarwal,Shashwat Alok,Sergio Correia,Deepa Mani,Bernardo Morais

2024-09-24

Abstract:We analyze the staggered entry of rideshare services across U.S. metropolitan areas, estimating its effect on the spatial redistribution and real outcomes of residents. Ridesharing services gentrify urban areas-especially those with ex-ante lower housing values-causing housing prices to rise 9 percent, with the in-migration of rich-younger individuals more than offsetting the out-migration of incumbent residents and reduced in-migration of poorer individuals. Impact on incumbent residents is conditional on ex-ante homeownership. For homeowners, there is no displacement and a decline in delinquency rates. For non-homeowners, displacement and delinquency rates rise 11 percent and 42 percent, respectively. Our study emphasizes how the private provision of high-end transportation technologies can increase urbanization and exacerbate inequality.

General Economics
Ride-share matching algorithms generate income inequality

Eszter Bokányi,Anikó Hannák

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63171-9

2020-08-31

Abstract:Despite the potential of online sharing economy platforms such as Uber, Lyft, or Foodora to democratize the labor market, these services are often accused of fostering unfair working conditions and low wages. These problems have been recognized by researchers and regulators but the size and complexity of these socio-technical systems, combined with the lack of transparency about algorithmic practices, makes it difficult to understand system dynamics and large-scale behavior. This paper combines approaches from complex systems and algorithmic fairness to investigate the effect of algorithm design decisions on wage inequality in ride-hailing markets. We first present a computational model that includes conditions about locations of drivers and passengers, traffic, the layout of the city, and the algorithm that matches requests with drivers. We calibrate the model with parameters derived from empirical data. Our simulations show that small changes in the system parameters can cause large deviations in the income distributions of drivers, leading to a highly unpredictable system which often distributes vastly different incomes to identically performing drivers. As suggested by recent studies about feedback loops in algorithmic systems, these initial income differences can result in enforced and long-term wage gaps.

Physics and Society
Can sharing a ride make for less traffic? Evidence from Uber and Lyft and implications for cities

Bruce Schaller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.12.015

IF: 6.173

2021-03-01

Transport Policy

Abstract:The popularity of Uber and Lyft and advances in autonomous vehicle technology have spurred public interest in the potential of shared ride services to reduce traffic congestion, vehicle emissions and space devoted to parking. However, research has shown that long waiting times, circuitous routes and privacy concerns might lead most patrons to choose exclusive-ride services over shared services (ride-hail or autonomous), thus increasing rather than decreasing vehicle mileage.This paper uses Uber and Lyft experience from 2014 to 2020 to examine the effectiveness of shared (or "pooled") services in reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in four cities with large concentrations of ride-hail trips and suburban areas of California. Taking into account three key inputs -- pooling rates, modal shifts and deadhead miles – results show that pre-pandemic levels of pooling led to at least a doubling of VMT when comparing ride-hail trips with patrons' previous mode, with increases of 97% in Chicago, 114% in New York City, 118% in San Francisco, 157% in Boston and 118% in California suburbs.These large VMT increases are driven by the addition of dead-head miles before each pick-up and the absence of offsetting VMT reductions among travelers who switch to ride-hail from public transportation, biking and walking. VMT increases are only modestly mitigated by the use of ride-hail for "first mile/last mile" trips to connect to public transportation or by reduced cruising for parking by drivers in their personal vehicles.In sum, ride-hail adds to vehicle mileage for trips associated with ride-hail even taking into account pooling. This pattern is likely to endure in a world of autonomous vehicles given that auto users tend to switch to solo services due to considerations of travel time, reliability, comfort and privacy, while pooled options mainly draw patrons from sustainable modes like public transportation. The implication for public policy is that in dense urban areas, it remains important for policy-makers to prioritize space-efficient modes of public transportation, walking and biking. At the same time, ride-hail can clearly be valuable to meet specific needs such as providing paratransit services to people with disabilities, providing first and last mile connections to transit services and connecting late-night workers to jobs.These results will be important as cities emerge from the coronavirus pandemic and navigate a path to economic recovery, social equity, and environmental sustainability.

transportation,economics
Does ridesourcing respond to unplanned rail disruptions? A natural experiment analysis of mobility resilience and disparity

Elisa Borowski,Jason Soria,Joseph Schofer,Amanda Stathopoulos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104439

IF: 6.7

2023-06-22

Cities

Abstract:Urban rail transit networks provide critical access to opportunities and livelihood in many urban systems. Ensuring that these services are resilient (that is, exhibiting efficient responses to and recovery from disruptions) is a key economic and social priority. Increasingly, the ability of urban rail systems to cope with disruptions is a function of a complex patchwork of mobility options, wherein alternative modes can complement and fill occurring service gaps. This study analyzes the role of ridesourcing in providing adaptive mobility capacity that could be leveraged to fill no-notice gaps in rail transit services, addressing the question of distributional impacts of resilience. Using a natural experiment, we systematically identify 28 major transit disruptions over the period of one year in Chicago and match them, both temporally and spatially, with ridesourcing trip data. Using multilevel mixed modeling, we quantify variation in the adaptive use of on-demand mobility across the racially and economically diverse city of Chicago. Our findings show that the gap-filling potential of adaptive ridesourcing during rail transit disruptions is significantly influenced by the station-, community-, and district-level factors. Specifically, greater shifts to ridesourcing occur during weekdays, nonholidays, and more severe disruptions, in community areas that have higher percentages of white residents and transit commuters, and in the more affluent North district of the city. These findings suggest that while ridesourcing appears to provide adaptive capacity during rail disruptions, its benefits do not appear to be equitable for lower-income communities of color that already experience limited mobility options. Research implications for mobility operator collaborations to support mobility as a service are discussed. This study builds a more comprehensive understanding of transit service resilience, variation in vulnerability, and the complementarity of ridesourcing to existing transport networks during disruptions.

urban studies
Who loses and who wins in the ride-hailing era? A case study of Austin, Texas

Wei Zhai,Junfeng Jiao,Shengxiao(Alex) Li,Chao (Kenneth) Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.03.009

IF: 6.173

2022-05-01

Transport Policy

Abstract:Ride-hailing has redefined vehicle access and has the potential to reduce travel difficulties for transit-poor areas and people with poor access to private and public transportation resources. Due to the lack of data, current studies lack a holistic understanding of how transportation resources serve different social groups and places in the ride-hailing era in low-density areas. This study uses multiple sources of data in Austin, Texas to understand: (1) how ride-hailing usage, transit supply, and vehicle ownership distribute across neighborhoods with different densities, income, and racial and ethnic compositions; (2) who are ride-hailing users among those with and without private vehicles, and how their ride-hailing usage and attitudes towards ride-hailing versus transit differ. Our study has shown that the ride-hailing services have provided residents living in low-income, low-density neighborhoods, and neighborhoods with a majority of Hispanics with an alternative transportation mode. However, residents living in low-density and low-income neighborhoods still use ride-hailing services less frequently than those living in high-density and high-income neighborhoods. The user survey further shows that ride-hailing users without private vehicles tend to be racial and minorities or younger people with higher education. Ride-hailing services provide people with a convenient and safe transportation mode, regardless of their vehicle ownership. Our study shows the importance of ride-hailing in mitigating the social and spatial disparity and the opportunity of integrating ride-hailing and transit in transportation planning in low-density areas.

transportation,economics
Understanding Ridesplitting Behavior with Interpretable Machine Learning Models Using Chicago Transportation Network Company Data

Hoseb Abkarian,Ying Chen,Hani S. Mahmassani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211036363

2021-09-11

Abstract:As congestion levels increase in cities, it is important to analyze people’s choices of different services provided by transportation network companies (TNCs). Using machine learning techniques in conjunction with large TNC data, this paper focuses on uncovering complex relationships underlying ridesplitting market share. A real-world dataset provided by TNCs in Chicago is used in analyzing ridesourcing trips from November 2018 to December 2019 to understand trends in the city. Aggregated origin–destination trip-level characteristics, such as mean cost, mean time, and travel time reliability, are extracted and combined with origin–destination community-level characteristics. Three tree-based algorithms are then utilized to model the market share of ridesplitting trips. The most significant factors are extracted as well as their marginal effect on ridesplitting behavior, using partial dependency plots for interpretation of the machine learning model results. The results suggest that, overall, community-level factors are as or more important than trip-level characteristics. Additionally, the percentage of White people highly affects ridesplitting market share as well as the percentage of bachelor’s degree holders and households with two people residing in them. Travel time reliability and cost variability are also deemed more important than travel time and cost savings. Finally, the potential impact of taxes, crimes, cultural differences, and comfort is discussed in driving the market share, and suggestions are presented for future research and data collection attempts.

transportation science & technology,engineering, civil
Fairness-Enhancing Vehicle Rebalancing in the Ride-hailing System

Xiaotong Guo,Hanyong Xu,Dingyi Zhuang,Yunhan Zheng,Jinhua Zhao

2023-12-30

Abstract:The rapid growth of the ride-hailing industry has revolutionized urban transportation worldwide. Despite its benefits, equity concerns arise as underserved communities face limited accessibility to affordable ride-hailing services. A key issue in this context is the vehicle rebalancing problem, where idle vehicles are moved to areas with anticipated demand. Without equitable approaches in demand forecasting and rebalancing strategies, these practices can further deepen existing inequities. In the realm of ride-hailing, three main facets of fairness are recognized: algorithmic fairness, fairness to drivers, and fairness to riders. This paper focuses on enhancing both algorithmic and rider fairness through a novel vehicle rebalancing method. We introduce an approach that combines a Socio-Aware Spatial-Temporal Graph Convolutional Network (SA-STGCN) for refined demand prediction and a fairness-integrated Matching-Integrated Vehicle Rebalancing (MIVR) model for subsequent vehicle rebalancing. Our methodology is designed to reduce prediction discrepancies and ensure equitable service provision across diverse regions. The effectiveness of our system is evaluated using simulations based on real-world ride-hailing data. The results suggest that our proposed method enhances both accuracy and fairness in forecasting ride-hailing demand, ultimately resulting in more equitable vehicle rebalancing in subsequent operations. Specifically, the algorithm developed in this study effectively reduces the standard deviation and average customer wait times by 6.48% and 0.49%, respectively. This achievement signifies a beneficial outcome for ride-hailing platforms, striking a balance between operational efficiency and fairness.

Machine Learning
Understanding Ride-Hailing Sharing and Matching in Chicago Using Travel Time, Cost, and Choice Models

Richard (Alex) Mucci,Gregory D. Erhardt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231173636

IF: 1.7

2023-06-09

Transportation Research Record

Abstract:Transportation Research Record, Ahead of Print. Ride-hailing data is sparingly available throughout the U.S., which limits researchers' understanding of the mode. Chicago is one of a few cities that have mandated ride-hailing companies to submit detailed trip data to their local transportation agency. The dataset is one of the few to contain trip-level attributes such as fare, travel time, and trip length. Most research using the Chicago dataset has focused on understanding why people use ride-hailing. This study focuses on why ride-hailing passengers choose shared over private trips and what influences the shared trips to be matched. Trips to/from airports are less likely to be shared. Trips to/from low-income areas are more likely to be shared. Longer shared trips are more likely to be matched, shared trips to/from dense areas are more likely to be matched, and shared trips between areas with a high number of shared trips are more likely to be matched. Matching an additional shared trip with another adds approximately 4 min to a trip. Ride-hailing users' value of time is found to be $48.23 per hour. Understanding travel behavior is important for all modes of transportation including ride-hailing. The results of this paper can be applied to guide polices aiming to promote more sustainable transportation modes.
Uber Economics: Evaluating the Monetary and Travel Time Trade-Offs of Transportation Network Companies and Transit Service in Chicago, Illinois

Joseph P. Schwieterman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119839344

2019-04-01

Abstract:The potential diversion of passengers from public transit to transportation network companies (TNCs) is attracting considerable attention in metropolitan regions. Despite this, relatively little microeconomic analysis has been made available to explore how service attributes affect choices between the services offered by TNCs and public transit. To fill this shortfall, this study evaluates prices and service levels for Lyft, Lyft Line, UberX, UberPool, and Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) services in Chicago. Analysis of 3,075 fares and estimated travel times for 620 trips in the 4- to 11-mile range shows TNCs tend to be relatively costly when expressed in relation to the additional amount spent per unit of time saved. The average traveler using these four TNC services, across the entire sample, spends the equivalent of $42–$108 per hour saved—well above the $14.95/hr. the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) recommends assigning to the average transit passenger when conducting analyses about the value of time. However, for travelers on business and those between locations poorly served by transit, including trips between neighborhoods with less transit service than the downtown district, the analysis shows a significant share of passengers will likely find TNCs cost-effective options based on the U.S. DOT standard. The approach taken illustrates how the mobility benefits and competitive issues associated with TNCs can be systematically evaluated by reviewing the price and travel time characteristics of each trip.

transportation science & technology,engineering, civil
We are on the Way: Analysis of On-Demand Ride-Hailing Systems

Guiyun Feng,Guangwen Kong,Zizhuo Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2960991

2017-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Recently, there has been a rapid rise of on-demand ride-hailing platforms, such as Uber and Didi, which allow passengers with smart phones to submit trip requests and match them to drivers based on their locations and drivers' availability. This increased demand has raised questions about how such a new matching mechanism will affect the efficiency of the transportation system, in particular, whether it will help reduce passengers' average waiting time compared to traditional street-hailing systems. In this talk, we shed light on this question by building a stylized model of a circular road and comparing the average waiting time of passengers under various matching mechanisms. We discover the inefficiency in the on-demand ride-hailing system when the en-route time is long, which may result in non-monotonicity of passengers' average waiting time as passenger arrival rate increases. After identifying key tradeoffs between different mechanisms, we find that the on-demand matching mechanism could result in lower efficiency than the traditional street-hailing mechanism when the system utilization level is medium and the road length is long. To overcome the disadvantage of both systems, we further propose adding response caps to the on-demand ride-hailing mechanism and develop a heuristic method to calculate a near-optimal cap. We also examine the impact of passenger abandonments, idle time strategies of taxis and traffic congestion on the performance of the ride-hailing systems. The results of this research would be instrumental for understanding the tradeoffs of the new service paradigm and thus enable policy makers to make more informed decisions when enacting regulations for this emerging service paradigm.

[Colorectal cancer screening: reaffirming the past and resolutely advancing toward the future].

Disparate Impact of Artificial Intelligence Bias in Ridehailing Economy's Price Discrimination Algorithms

Unveiling and Mitigating Bias in Ride-Hailing Pricing for Equitable Policy Making

A Balancing Act of Regulating On-Demand Ride Services

Evaluating Fairness in Black-box Algorithmic Markets: A Case Study of Ride Sharing in Chicago

Disparities in ridesourcing demand for mobility resilience: A multilevel analysis of neighborhood effects in Chicago, Illinois

Comparative Analysis of Usage Patterns and Underlying Determinants for Ride-hailing and Traditional Taxi Services: A Chicago Case Study

Exploring the Tradeoff Between System Profit and Income Equality Among Ride-hailing Drivers

Scale effects in ridesplitting: A case study of the City of Chicago

Taxing ride‐sharing: Which neighborhoods pay more?

Impact of Ride-Hailing Services on Transportation Mode Choices: Evidence from Traffic and Transit Ridership

Transportation Technology and Gentrification: Evidence from the entry of Ridesharing Services

Ride-share matching algorithms generate income inequality

Can sharing a ride make for less traffic? Evidence from Uber and Lyft and implications for cities

Does ridesourcing respond to unplanned rail disruptions? A natural experiment analysis of mobility resilience and disparity

Who loses and who wins in the ride-hailing era? A case study of Austin, Texas

Understanding Ridesplitting Behavior with Interpretable Machine Learning Models Using Chicago Transportation Network Company Data

Fairness-Enhancing Vehicle Rebalancing in the Ride-hailing System

Understanding Ride-Hailing Sharing and Matching in Chicago Using Travel Time, Cost, and Choice Models

Uber Economics: Evaluating the Monetary and Travel Time Trade-Offs of Transportation Network Companies and Transit Service in Chicago, Illinois

We are on the Way: Analysis of On-Demand Ride-Hailing Systems