A Case Report of Retroperitoneal Ectopic Pregnancy After in vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer and Literature Review
Zesi Liu,Chunli Jing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S408319
2023-05-05
Abstract:Zesi Liu, 1 Chunli Jing 2 1 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Ultrasound of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Chunli Jing, Department of Ultrasound of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China, Tel +86-133-522-31070, Fax +86-82866055, Email Background: Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (REP) is an extremely rare type of ectopic pregnancy that can be life threatening. The pathogenesis of REP remains inconclusive and the diagnosis and treatment modalities are unclear. Case Presentation and Review of the Literature: A 27-year-old woman (gravida: 3; parturition: 0) underwent transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) 40 days after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET); no intrauterine gestational sac was detected. The patient was asymptomatic and had no abnormalities on physical examination. β-HCG and progesterone were 18.210 mIU/mL and 10.891 ng/mL, respectively. Transabdominal ultrasound (TAS) showed that the gestational sac had implanted adjacent to the abdominal aorta and near a branch of the iliac artery. Laparoscopic exploration was performed under general anesthesia; intraoperative findings showed that the gestational sac was approximately 2.5 cm in diameter and in the same location as suggested by preoperative ultrasound. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of EP. On day three post-surgery, the levels of β-HCG had fallen to 911 mIU/mL. We further systematically reviewed the REP cases reported in the English literature and performed a review on the diagnosis and treatment of REP. Conclusion: Clinicians should be alert to the occurrence of REP. Combined radiological examinations including ultrasonography (TAS and TVS), CT, and MRI are essential for the early diagnosis of REP. Once a definitive diagnosis is made, appropriate treatment should be administered immediately. Although there are cases of successful drug treatment described in the literature, surgery remains as the primary treatment option for REP. Keywords: retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy, ultrasound, surgery, diagnosis, review With recent advances in ultrasound diagnostic technology and the popularity of β-HCG testing, the rate of misdiagnosis and the mortality of ectopic pregnancy (EP) have decreased steadily. 1 However, EP remains the leading cause of death among women with early pregnancy, accounting for approximately 9% of all pregnancy-related deaths. 2,3 Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (REP) is an extremely rare type of EP in which the embryo implants into the retroperitoneal space. 4,5 By searching PubMed, we found that only 35 cases of REP have been published since Hall et al reported the very first case of REP in 1973. Due to its bizarre implantation site, variable clinical features and extremely low incidence, the misdiagnosis rate of REP is extremely high, and the mortality rate is approximately seven-fold higher than the common type of EP. 6 There is no treatment guideline for REP. Therefore, in order to provide clinicians with more clues about the diagnosis and treatment of REP, we report a case of REP implanted adjacent to the abdominal aorta and near the branch of the iliac artery and conducted a review on all cases reported in the English literature. The case was a 27-year-old female, a gravida 3 para 0, with regular menstruation, moderate volume, and no dysmenorrhea. She had undergone salpingectomy for an ectopic pregnancy 3 years and 6 years previously. On this occasion, in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) had been performed at Dalian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Dalian Medical University, and two embryos had been transferred into the uterus. After 40 days, the levels of β-HCG and progesterone were 18,210 IU/L and 10.891 ng/mL, respectively, and ultrasound was performed to assess embryonic development. Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) showed that the endometrium was approximately 1.6 cm thick but no gestational sac was found in the uterine cavity, bilateral uterine horns, or bilateral adnexal areas (Figure 1A and B). There was a right ovarian echo loss approximately 1.6 cm × 1.2 cm × 1.4 cm in size with a ring blood-flow signal. The left ovary was normal. No free liquid dark areas were seen in the pelvic abdomen. A transabdominal ultrasound (TAS) was performed and the scan was expanded. A gestational sac-like echo was seen 2 cm to the right of the umbilical orifice immediately anterior to the right of the abdominal aorta (near the branch of the -Abstract Truncated-
obstetrics & gynecology