Role of Responsive Neurostimulation in Managing Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes

Omid Mushtaq,Han Grezenko,Abdur Rehman,Hamza Sher,Zarrar Sher,Delphyne Anyang Kaakyire,Syed Hanifullah,Muath Dabas,Ghaida Saleh,Abdullah Shehryar,Isa Khan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68032
2024-08-28
Cureus
Abstract:Drug-resistant epilepsy remains a substantial challenge in neurology, affecting patients who do not respond to conventional antiepileptic drugs. Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach, yet comprehensive reviews synthesizing its clinical outcomes are sparse. This systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and involved a comprehensive database search through PubMed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus, covering literature up to April 2024. The review targeted peer-reviewed articles evaluating the efficacy, safety, and quality of life impacts of RNS in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Key inclusion criteria encompassed clinical trials, cohort studies, and meta-analyses, while exclusion criteria included non-peer-reviewed and irrelevant studies. We identified five studies meeting our inclusion criteria. These studies collectively demonstrated that RNS significantly reduces seizure frequency and improves quality of life, while maintaining a favorable safety profile. Despite small sample sizes and potential selection biases, the benefits of RNS appeared consistent across diverse patient demographics. RNS represents a viable and effective treatment option for drug-resistant epilepsy, offering significant improvements in seizure control and patient quality of life. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and refining patient selection to optimize the therapeutic benefits of RNS. The integration of RNS into standard epilepsy management protocols is recommended based on current evidence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?