Dosimetry of strontium-90 in swine bones. BNWL-1050.

C. R. Watson,R. Palmer

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Exploring factors influencing user perspective of ChatGPT as a technology that assists in healthcare decision making: A cross sectional survey study

Avishek Choudhury,Safa Elkefi,Achraf Tounsi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296151

IF: 3.7

2024-03-08

PLoS ONE

Abstract:As ChatGPT emerges as a potential ally in healthcare decision-making, it is imperative to investigate how users leverage and perceive it. The repurposing of technology is innovative but brings risks, especially since AI’s effectiveness depends on the data it’s fed. In healthcare, ChatGPT might provide sound advice based on current medical knowledge, which could turn into misinformation if its data sources later include erroneous information. Our study assesses user perceptions of ChatGPT, particularly of those who used ChatGPT for healthcare-related queries. By examining factors such as competence, reliability, transparency, trustworthiness, security, and persuasiveness of ChatGPT, the research aimed to understand how users rely on ChatGPT for health-related decision-making. A web-based survey was distributed to U.S. adults using ChatGPT at least once a month. Bayesian Linear Regression was used to understand how much ChatGPT aids in informed decision-making. This analysis was conducted on subsets of respondents, both those who used ChatGPT for healthcare decisions and those who did not. Qualitative data from open-ended questions were analyzed using content analysis, with thematic coding to extract public opinions on urban environmental policies. Six hundred and seven individuals responded to the survey. Respondents were distributed across 306 US cities of which 20 participants were from rural cities. Of all the respondents, 44 used ChatGPT for health-related queries and decision-making. In the healthcare context, the most effective model highlights ’Competent + Trustworthy + ChatGPT for healthcare queries’, underscoring the critical importance of perceived competence and trustworthiness specifically in the realm of healthcare applications of ChatGPT. On the other hand, the non-healthcare context reveals a broader spectrum of influential factors in its best model, which includes ’Trustworthy + Secure + Benefits outweigh risks + Satisfaction + Willing to take decisions + Intent to use + Persuasive’. In conclusion our study findings suggest a clear demarcation in user expectations and requirements from AI systems based on the context of their use. We advocate for a balanced approach where technological advancement and user readiness are harmonized.

multidisciplinary sciences
Understanding Health Care Students' Perceptions, Beliefs, and Attitudes Toward AI-Powered Language Models: Cross-Sectional Study

Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda,Juan C Gallardo-Bastidas,Karla Robles-Velasco,María F Osorio,Eleonor Maria Velez Leon,Manuel Leon Velastegui,Patrícia Pauletto,F C Aguilar-Díaz,Aldo Squassi,Susana Patricia González Eras,Erita Cordero Carrasco,Karol Leonor Chavez Gonzalez,Juan C Calderon,Jean Bousquet,Anna Bedbrook,Marco Faytong-Haro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/51757

2024-08-13

Abstract:Background: ChatGPT was not intended for use in health care, but it has potential benefits that depend on end-user understanding and acceptability, which is where health care students become crucial. There is still a limited amount of research in this area. Objective: The primary aim of our study was to assess the frequency of ChatGPT use, the perceived level of knowledge, the perceived risks associated with its use, and the ethical issues, as well as attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in the context of education in the field of health. In addition, we aimed to examine whether there were differences across groups based on demographic variables. The second part of the study aimed to assess the association between the frequency of use, the level of perceived knowledge, the level of risk perception, and the level of perception of ethics as predictive factors for participants' attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from May to June 2023 encompassing students of medicine, nursing, dentistry, nutrition, and laboratory science across the Americas. The study used descriptive analysis, chi-square tests, and ANOVA to assess statistical significance across different categories. The study used several ordinal logistic regression models to analyze the impact of predictive factors (frequency of use, perception of knowledge, perception of risk, and ethics perception scores) on attitude as the dependent variable. The models were adjusted for gender, institution type, major, and country. Stata was used to conduct all the analyses. Results: Of 2661 health care students, 42.99% (n=1144) were unaware of ChatGPT. The median score of knowledge was "minimal" (median 2.00, IQR 1.00-3.00). Most respondents (median 2.61, IQR 2.11-3.11) regarded ChatGPT as neither ethical nor unethical. Most participants (median 3.89, IQR 3.44-4.34) "somewhat agreed" that ChatGPT (1) benefits health care settings, (2) provides trustworthy data, (3) is a helpful tool for clinical and educational medical information access, and (4) makes the work easier. In total, 70% (7/10) of people used it for homework. As the perceived knowledge of ChatGPT increased, there was a stronger tendency with regard to having a favorable attitude toward ChatGPT. Higher ethical consideration perception ratings increased the likelihood of considering ChatGPT as a source of trustworthy health care information (odds ratio [OR] 1.620, 95% CI 1.498-1.752), beneficial in medical issues (OR 1.495, 95% CI 1.452-1.539), and useful for medical literature (OR 1.494, 95% CI 1.426-1.564; P<.001 for all results). Conclusions: Over 40% of American health care students (1144/2661, 42.99%) were unaware of ChatGPT despite its extensive use in the health field. Our data revealed the positive attitudes toward ChatGPT and the desire to learn more about it. Medical educators must explore how chatbots may be included in undergraduate health care education programs.
Public comfort with the use of ChatGPT and expectations for healthcare

Jodyn Platt,Paige Nong,Renée Smiddy,Reema Hamasha,Gloria Carmona Clavijo,Joshua Richardson,Sharon L R Kardia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae164

2024-09-01

Abstract:Objectives: To examine whether comfort with the use of ChatGPT in society differs from comfort with other uses of AI in society and to identify whether this comfort and other patient characteristics such as trust, privacy concerns, respect, and tech-savviness are associated with expected benefit of the use of ChatGPT for improving health. Materials and methods: We analyzed an original survey of U.S. adults using the NORC AmeriSpeak Panel (n = 1787). We conducted paired t-tests to assess differences in comfort with AI applications. We conducted weighted univariable regression and 2 weighted logistic regression models to identify predictors of expected benefit with and without accounting for trust in the health system. Results: Comfort with the use of ChatGPT in society is relatively low and different from other, common uses of AI. Comfort was highly associated with expecting benefit. Other statistically significant factors in multivariable analysis (not including system trust) included feeling respected and low privacy concerns. Females, younger adults, and those with higher levels of education were less likely to expect benefits in models with and without system trust, which was positively associated with expecting benefits (P = 1.6 × 10-11). Tech-savviness was not associated with the outcome. Discussion: Understanding the impact of large language models (LLMs) from the patient perspective is critical to ensuring that expectations align with performance as a form of calibrated trust that acknowledges the dynamic nature of trust. Conclusion: Including measures of system trust in evaluating LLMs could capture a range of issues critical for ensuring patient acceptance of this technological innovation.
User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-sectional Survey Study

Yeganeh Shahsavar,Avishek Choudhury

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/47564

2023-05-17

Abstract:Background: With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, AI-powered chatbots, such as Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT), have emerged as potential tools for various applications, including health care. However, ChatGPT is not specifically designed for health care purposes, and its use for self-diagnosis raises concerns regarding its adoption's potential risks and benefits. Users are increasingly inclined to use ChatGPT for self-diagnosis, necessitating a deeper understanding of the factors driving this trend. Objective: This study aims to investigate the factors influencing users' perception of decision-making processes and intentions to use ChatGPT for self-diagnosis and to explore the implications of these findings for the safe and effective integration of AI chatbots in health care. Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was used, and data were collected from 607 participants. The relationships between performance expectancy, risk-reward appraisal, decision-making, and intention to use ChatGPT for self-diagnosis were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Results: Most respondents were willing to use ChatGPT for self-diagnosis (n=476, 78.4%). The model demonstrated satisfactory explanatory power, accounting for 52.4% of the variance in decision-making and 38.1% in the intent to use ChatGPT for self-diagnosis. The results supported all 3 hypotheses: The higher performance expectancy of ChatGPT (β=.547, 95% CI 0.474-0.620) and positive risk-reward appraisals (β=.245, 95% CI 0.161-0.325) were positively associated with the improved perception of decision-making outcomes among users, and enhanced perception of decision-making processes involving ChatGPT positively impacted users' intentions to use the technology for self-diagnosis (β=.565, 95% CI 0.498-0.628). Conclusions: Our research investigated factors influencing users' intentions to use ChatGPT for self-diagnosis and health-related purposes. Even though the technology is not specifically designed for health care, people are inclined to use ChatGPT in health care contexts. Instead of solely focusing on discouraging its use for health care purposes, we advocate for improving the technology and adapting it for suitable health care applications. Our study highlights the importance of collaboration among AI developers, health care providers, and policy makers in ensuring AI chatbots' safe and responsible use in health care. By understanding users' expectations and decision-making processes, we can develop AI chatbots, such as ChatGPT, that are tailored to human needs, providing reliable and verified health information sources. This approach not only enhances health care accessibility but also improves health literacy and awareness. As the field of AI chatbots in health care continues to evolve, future research should explore the long-term effects of using AI chatbots for self-diagnosis and investigate their potential integration with other digital health interventions to optimize patient care and outcomes. In doing so, we can ensure that AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, are designed and implemented to safeguard users' well-being and support positive health outcomes in health care settings.
Using ChatGPT for Clinical Practice and Medical Education: Cross-Sectional Survey of Medical Students’ and Physicians’ Perceptions

Pasin Tangadulrat,Supinya Sono,Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/50658

2023-12-22

JMIR Medical Education

Abstract:Background ChatGPT is a well-known large language model–based chatbot. It could be used in the medical field in many aspects. However, some physicians are still unfamiliar with ChatGPT and are concerned about its benefits and risks. Objective We aim to evaluate the perception of physicians and medical students toward using ChatGPT in the medical field. Methods A web-based questionnaire was sent to medical students, interns, residents, and attending staff with questions regarding their perception toward using ChatGPT in clinical practice and medical education. Participants were also asked to rate their perception of ChatGPT’s generated response about knee osteoarthritis. Results Participants included 124 medical students, 46 interns, 37 residents, and 32 attending staff. After reading ChatGPT’s response, 132 of the 239 (55.2%) participants had a positive rating about using ChatGPT for clinical practice. The proportion of positive answers was significantly lower in graduated physicians (48/115, 42%) compared with medical students (84/124, 68%; P<.001). Participants listed a lack of a patient-specific treatment plan, updated evidence, and a language barrier as ChatGPT’s pitfalls. Regarding using ChatGPT for medical education, the proportion of positive responses was also significantly lower in graduate physicians (71/115, 62%) compared to medical students (103/124, 83.1%; P<.001). Participants were concerned that ChatGPT’s response was too superficial, might lack scientific evidence, and might need expert verification. Conclusions Medical students generally had a positive perception of using ChatGPT for guiding treatment and medical education, whereas graduated doctors were more cautious in this regard. Nonetheless, both medical students and graduated doctors positively perceived using ChatGPT for creating patient educational materials.
ChatGPT and Clinical Training: Perception, Concerns, and Practice of Pharm-D Students

Mohammed Zawiah,Fahmi Y Al-Ashwal,Lobna Gharaibeh,Rana Abu Farha,Karem H Alzoubi,Khawla Abu Hammour,Qutaiba A Qasim,Fahd Abrah

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S439223

2023-12-15

Abstract:Background: The emergence of Chat-Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) by OpenAI has revolutionized AI technology, demonstrating significant potential in healthcare and pharmaceutical education, yet its real-world applicability in clinical training warrants further investigation. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between April and May 2023 to assess PharmD students' perceptions, concerns, and experiences regarding the integration of ChatGPT into clinical pharmacy education. The study utilized a convenient sampling method through online platforms and involved a questionnaire with sections on demographics, perceived benefits, concerns, and experience with ChatGPT. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, including descriptive and inferential analyses. Results: The findings of the study involving 211 PharmD students revealed that the majority of participants were male (77.3%), and had prior experience with artificial intelligence (68.2%). Over two-thirds were aware of ChatGPT. Most students (n= 139, 65.9%) perceived potential benefits in using ChatGPT for various clinical tasks, with concerns including over-reliance, accuracy, and ethical considerations. Adoption of ChatGPT in clinical training varied, with some students not using it at all, while others utilized it for tasks like evaluating drug-drug interactions and developing care plans. Previous users tended to have higher perceived benefits and lower concerns, but the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Utilizing ChatGPT in clinical training offers opportunities, but students' lack of trust in it for clinical decisions highlights the need for collaborative human-ChatGPT decision-making. It should complement healthcare professionals' expertise and be used strategically to compensate for human limitations. Further research is essential to optimize ChatGPT's effective integration.
Utility of ChatGPT in Clinical Practice

Jialin Liu,Changyu Wang,Siru Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/48568

IF: 7.076

2023-06-29

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract:ChatGPT is receiving increasing attention and has a variety of application scenarios in clinical practice. In clinical decision support, ChatGPT has been used to generate accurate differential diagnosis lists, support clinical decision-making, optimize clinical decision support, and provide insights for cancer screening decisions. In addition, ChatGPT has been used for intelligent question-answering to provide reliable information about diseases and medical queries. In terms of medical documentation, ChatGPT has proven effective in generating patient clinical letters, radiology reports, medical notes, and discharge summaries, improving efficiency and accuracy for health care providers. Future research directions include real-time monitoring and predictive analytics, precision medicine and personalized treatment, the role of ChatGPT in telemedicine and remote health care, and integration with existing health care systems. Overall, ChatGPT is a valuable tool that complements the expertise of health care providers and improves clinical decision-making and patient care. However, ChatGPT is a double-edged sword. We need to carefully consider and study the benefits and potential dangers of ChatGPT. In this viewpoint, we discuss recent advances in ChatGPT research in clinical practice and suggest possible risks and challenges of using ChatGPT in clinical practice. It will help guide and support future artificial intelligence research similar to ChatGPT in health.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Non‐redundant inhibitor of differentiation (Id) gene expression and function in human prostate epithelial cells

Ananthi J. Asirvatham,Michelle A. Schmidt,J. Chaudhary

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.20366

2006-06-15

The Prostate

Abstract:The four Id (inhibitor of differentiation) proteins (Id1, Id2, Id3, and Id4) dimerize and neutralize the transcriptional activity of basic helix‐loop‐helix (bHLH) proteins. The Id proteins negatively regulate differentiation and promote proliferation hence the expression of specific subsets of Id proteins is high in many different types of cancers. However, the expression of all the Id isoforms and their potential function in specific cancer cell types is not known. In this study, the expression and function of all four Id isoforms in prostate cancer cell lines was investigated to gain a better understanding of the role of each Id isoform in normal prostate epithelial and prostate cancer cells.
Attitude and utilization of ChatGPT among registered nurses: A cross-sectional study

Hui-Ling Lin,Li-Ling Liao,Ya-Ni Wang,Li-Chun Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.13012

2024-07-09

Abstract:Aim: This study explores the influencing factors of attitudes and behaviors toward use of ChatGPT based on the Technology Acceptance Model among registered nurses in Taiwan. Background: The complexity of medical services and nursing shortages increases workloads. ChatGPT swiftly answers medical questions, provides clinical guidelines, and assists with patient information management, thereby improving nursing efficiency. Introduction: To facilitate the development of effective ChatGPT training programs, it is essential to examine registered nurses' attitudes toward and utilization of ChatGPT across diverse workplace settings. Methods: An anonymous online survey was used to collect data from over 1000 registered nurses recruited through social media platforms between November 2023 and January 2024. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted for data analysis. Results: Among respondents, some were unfamiliar with ChatGPT, while others had used it before, with higher usage among males, higher-educated individuals, experienced nurses, and supervisors. Gender and work settings influenced perceived risks, and those familiar with ChatGPT recognized its social impact. Perceived risk and usefulness significantly influenced its adoption. Discussion: Nurse attitudes to ChatGPT vary based on gender, education, experience, and role. Positive perceptions emphasize its usefulness, while risk concerns affect adoption. The insignificant role of perceived ease of use highlights ChatGPT's user-friendly nature. Conclusion: Over half of the surveyed nurses had used or were familiar with ChatGPT and showed positive attitudes toward its use. Establishing rigorous guidelines to enhance their interaction with ChatGPT is crucial for future training. Implications for nursing and health policy: Nurse managers should understand registered nurses' attitudes toward ChatGPT and integrate it into in-service education with tailored support and training, including appropriate prompt formulation and advanced decision-making, to prevent misuse.
The Impact of Performance Expectancy, Workload, Risk, and Satisfaction on Trust in ChatGPT: Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis

Avishek Choudhury,Hamid Shamszare

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/55399

2024-05-27

Abstract:Background: ChatGPT (OpenAI) is a powerful tool for a wide range of tasks, from entertainment and creativity to health care queries. There are potential risks and benefits associated with this technology. In the discourse concerning the deployment of ChatGPT and similar large language models, it is sensible to recommend their use primarily for tasks a human user can execute accurately. As we transition into the subsequent phase of ChatGPT deployment, establishing realistic performance expectations and understanding users' perceptions of risk associated with its use are crucial in determining the successful integration of this artificial intelligence (AI) technology. Objective: The aim of the study is to explore how perceived workload, satisfaction, performance expectancy, and risk-benefit perception influence users' trust in ChatGPT. Methods: A semistructured, web-based survey was conducted with 607 adults in the United States who actively use ChatGPT. The survey questions were adapted from constructs used in various models and theories such as the technology acceptance model, the theory of planned behavior, the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, and research on trust and security in digital environments. To test our hypotheses and structural model, we used the partial least squares structural equation modeling method, a widely used approach for multivariate analysis. Results: A total of 607 people responded to our survey. A significant portion of the participants held at least a high school diploma (n=204, 33.6%), and the majority had a bachelor's degree (n=262, 43.1%). The primary motivations for participants to use ChatGPT were for acquiring information (n=219, 36.1%), amusement (n=203, 33.4%), and addressing problems (n=135, 22.2%). Some participants used it for health-related inquiries (n=44, 7.2%), while a few others (n=6, 1%) used it for miscellaneous activities such as brainstorming, grammar verification, and blog content creation. Our model explained 64.6% of the variance in trust. Our analysis indicated a significant relationship between (1) workload and satisfaction, (2) trust and satisfaction, (3) performance expectations and trust, and (4) risk-benefit perception and trust. Conclusions: The findings underscore the importance of ensuring user-friendly design and functionality in AI-based applications to reduce workload and enhance user satisfaction, thereby increasing user trust. Future research should further explore the relationship between risk-benefit perception and trust in the context of AI chatbots.
Use of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification to assess perioperative risk in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

Ken‐ryu Han,Hyung L. Kim,A. Pantuck,F. Dorey,R. Figlin,A. Belldegrun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2003.12.048

IF: 2.633

2004-05-01

Urology

Abstract:
Medical Student Experiences and Perceptions of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence: Cross-Sectional Study

Saif M I Alkhaaldi,Carl H Kassab,Zakia Dimassi,Leen Oyoun Alsoud,Maha Al Fahim,Cynthia Al Hageh,Halah Ibrahim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/51302

2023-12-23

JMIR Medical Education

Abstract:Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize the way medicine is learned, taught, and practiced, and medical education must prepare learners for these inevitable changes. Academic medicine has, however, been slow to embrace recent AI advances. Since its launch in November 2022, ChatGPT has emerged as a fast and user-friendly large language model that can assist health care professionals, medical educators, students, trainees, and patients. While many studies focus on the technology's capabilities, potential, and risks, there is a gap in studying the perspective of end users. Objective: The aim of this study was to gauge the experiences and perspectives of graduating medical students on ChatGPT and AI in their training and future careers. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey of recently graduated medical students was conducted in an international academic medical center between May 5, 2023, and June 13, 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to tabulate variable frequencies. Results: Of 325 applicants to the residency programs, 265 completed the survey (an 81.5% response rate). The vast majority of respondents denied using ChatGPT in medical school, with 20.4% (n=54) using it to help complete written assessments and only 9.4% using the technology in their clinical work (n=25). More students planned to use it during residency, primarily for exploring new medical topics and research (n=168, 63.4%) and exam preparation (n=151, 57%). Male students were significantly more likely to believe that AI will improve diagnostic accuracy (n=47, 51.7% vs n=69, 39.7%; P =.001), reduce medical error (n=53, 58.2% vs n=71, 40.8%; P =.002), and improve patient care (n=60, 65.9% vs n=95, 54.6%; P =.007). Previous experience with AI was significantly associated with positive AI perception in terms of improving patient care, decreasing medical errors and misdiagnoses, and increasing the accuracy of diagnoses ( P =.001, P <.001, P =.008, respectively). Conclusions: The surveyed medical students had minimal formal and informal experience with AI tools and limited perceptions of the potential uses of AI in health care but had overall positive views of ChatGPT and AI and were optimistic about the future of AI in medical education and health care. Structured curricula and formal policies and guidelines are needed to adequately prepare medical learners for the forthcoming integration of AI in medicine.

English Else
The Potential Applications and Challenges of ChatGPT in the Medical Field

Yonglin Mu,Dawei He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s456659

IF: 2.145

2024-03-06

International Journal of General Medicine

Abstract:Yonglin Mu, Dawei He Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Dawei He, Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 136, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 18680856616, Email ChatGPT, an AI-driven conversational large language model (LLM), has garnered significant scholarly attention since its inception, owing to its manifold applications in the realm of medical science. This study primarily examines the merits, limitations, anticipated developments, and practical applications of ChatGPT in clinical practice, healthcare, medical education, and medical research. It underscores the necessity for further research and development to enhance its performance and deployment. Moreover, future research avenues encompass ongoing enhancements and standardization of ChatGPT, mitigating its limitations, and exploring its integration and applicability in translational and personalized medicine. Reflecting the narrative nature of this review, a focused literature search was performed to identify relevant publications on ChatGPT's use in medicine. This process was aimed at gathering a broad spectrum of insights to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state and future prospects of ChatGPT in the medical domain. The objective is to aid healthcare professionals in understanding the groundbreaking advancements associated with the latest artificial intelligence tools, while also acknowledging the opportunities and challenges presented by ChatGPT. Keywords: ChatGPT, clinical practice, healthcare, medical education, medical research, challenges In the 21st century, the innovation and advancement of AI technology are continually reshaping various aspects of the medical field. Particularly, the development of medical chatbots has provided patients with unprecedented convenience. Utilizing advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) and machine learning, these chatbots are capable of real-time interaction with patients, offering health consultations, disease diagnosis support, and even mental health counseling. 1 Previous studies have shown that medical chatbots can enhance patient experience in relevant fields, improving the quality and efficiency of healthcare services. 2,3 ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, is a sophisticated language model that utilizes deep learning techniques to generate human-like responses. It stands out as one of the largest publicly available language models. 4 By training on a vast amount of textual data, ChatGPT can effectively capture subtle nuances and intricacies in human language. As a result, it is capable of providing contextually relevant and appropriate responses. Given the ever-increasing medical knowledge and the complexity of clinical practice, doctors face significant pressure in processing information. Consequently, both doctors and patients have shown interest in ChatGPT due to its ability to provide accurate and prompt responses across a wide range of topics. The healthcare industry is abundant in data and possesses a substantial amount of text, creating an urgent demand for automation. The development of artificial intelligence enables improved processing and analysis of medical data, unveiling new associations between diseases and treatments. 5 Since its launch, ChatGPT has shown tremendous potential in the medical field, introducing new interaction patterns between doctors and patients in clinical practice, 6 as well as pioneering advancements in healthcare, medical education, and research. 7 However, ChatGPT is not a specialized medical application and should not be solely relied upon for medical decision-making, much less to replace healthcare professionals. 8 Frequently cited limitations of ChatGPT include restricted capabilities, inaccuracies, unclear citation sources, and the necessity for verification. Potential risks embrace plagiarism, hallucination (misrepresenting sources), academic misconduct, and ethical concerns. 9 Therefore, ChatGPT is more suitable as an auxiliary tool in the medical field, and the work and information it provides must undergo verification. In practical applications, errors in information generated by ChatGPT may impact an individual's health. Thus, stringent control and evaluation of the accuracy and safety of ChatGPT are particularly important. As a double-edged sword, ChatGPT offers increased efficiency and creativity while also posing risks, such as perpetuating biases, violating the law, and disseminating false information. As artificial intelligence gradually integrates into the healthcare field, healthcare professionals need not only to understand how to use such tools but als -Abstract Truncated-

medicine, general & internal
Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis

Avishek Choudhury,Hamid Shamszare

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/47184

2023-06-14

Abstract:Background: ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer) has gained popularity for its ability to generate human-like responses. It is essential to note that overreliance or blind trust in ChatGPT, especially in high-stakes decision-making contexts, can have severe consequences. Similarly, lacking trust in the technology can lead to underuse, resulting in missed opportunities. Objective: This study investigated the impact of users' trust in ChatGPT on their intent and actual use of the technology. Four hypotheses were tested: (1) users' intent to use ChatGPT increases with their trust in the technology; (2) the actual use of ChatGPT increases with users' intent to use the technology; (3) the actual use of ChatGPT increases with users' trust in the technology; and (4) users' intent to use ChatGPT can partially mediate the effect of trust in the technology on its actual use. Methods: This study distributed a web-based survey to adults in the United States who actively use ChatGPT (version 3.5) at least once a month between February 2023 through March 2023. The survey responses were used to develop 2 latent constructs: Trust and Intent to Use, with Actual Use being the outcome variable. The study used partial least squares structural equation modeling to evaluate and test the structural model and hypotheses. Results: In the study, 607 respondents completed the survey. The primary uses of ChatGPT were for information gathering (n=219, 36.1%), entertainment (n=203, 33.4%), and problem-solving (n=135, 22.2%), with a smaller number using it for health-related queries (n=44, 7.2%) and other activities (n=6, 1%). Our model explained 50.5% and 9.8% of the variance in Intent to Use and Actual Use, respectively, with path coefficients of 0.711 and 0.221 for Trust on Intent to Use and Actual Use, respectively. The bootstrapped results failed to reject all 4 null hypotheses, with Trust having a significant direct effect on both Intent to Use (β=0.711, 95% CI 0.656-0.764) and Actual Use (β=0.302, 95% CI 0.229-0.374). The indirect effect of Trust on Actual Use, partially mediated by Intent to Use, was also significant (β=0.113, 95% CI 0.001-0.227). Conclusions: Our results suggest that trust is critical to users' adoption of ChatGPT. It remains crucial to highlight that ChatGPT was not initially designed for health care applications. Therefore, an overreliance on it for health-related advice could potentially lead to misinformation and subsequent health risks. Efforts must be focused on improving the ChatGPT's ability to distinguish between queries that it can safely handle and those that should be redirected to human experts (health care professionals). Although risks are associated with excessive trust in artificial intelligence-driven chatbots such as ChatGPT, the potential risks can be reduced by advocating for shared accountability and fostering collaboration between developers, subject matter experts, and human factors researchers.
ChatGPT: A Conceptual Review of Applications and Utility in the Field of Medicine

Shiavax J. Rao,Ameesh Isath,Parvathy Krishnan,Jonathan A. Tangsrivimol,Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk,Zhen Wang,Benjamin S. Glicksberg,Chayakrit Krittanawong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02075-x

IF: 4.92

2024-06-06

Journal of Medical Systems

Abstract:Artificial Intelligence, specifically advanced language models such as ChatGPT, have the potential to revolutionize various aspects of healthcare, medical education, and research. In this narrative review, we evaluate the myriad applications of ChatGPT in diverse healthcare domains. We discuss its potential role in clinical decision-making, exploring how it can assist physicians by providing rapid, data-driven insights for diagnosis and treatment. We review the benefits of ChatGPT in personalized patient care, particularly in geriatric care, medication management, weight loss and nutrition, and physical activity guidance. We further delve into its potential to enhance medical research, through the analysis of large datasets, and the development of novel methodologies. In the realm of medical education, we investigate the utility of ChatGPT as an information retrieval tool and personalized learning resource for medical students and professionals. There are numerous promising applications of ChatGPT that will likely induce paradigm shifts in healthcare practice, education, and research. The use of ChatGPT may come with several benefits in areas such as clinical decision making, geriatric care, medication management, weight loss and nutrition, physical fitness, scientific research, and medical education. Nevertheless, it is important to note that issues surrounding ethics, data privacy, transparency, inaccuracy, and inadequacy persist. Prior to widespread use in medicine, it is imperative to objectively evaluate the impact of ChatGPT in a real-world setting using a risk-based approach.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
High-chloride concentrations abolish the binding of adenine nucleotides in the mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier family.

Eva-Maria Krammer,S. Ravaud,F. Dehez,A. Frelet-Barrand,E. Pebay‐Peyroula,C. Chipot

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.047

IF: 3.4

2009-11-15

Biophysical Journal

Abstract:
ChatGPT in medicine: prospects and challenges: a review article

Songtao Tan,Xin Xin,Di Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000001312

2024-03-19

International Journal of Surgery

Abstract:It has been a year since the launch of Chat Generator Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), a generative artificial intelligence (AI) program. The introduction of this cross-generational product initially brought a huge shock to people with its incredible potential, and then aroused increasing concerns among people. In the field of medicine, researchers have extensively explored the possible applications of ChatGPT and achieved numerous satisfactory results. However, opportunities and issues always come together. Problems have also been exposed during the applications of ChatGPT, requiring cautious handling, thorough consideration and further guidelines for safe use. Here, we summarized the potential applications of ChatGPT in the medical field, including revolutionizing healthcare consultation, assisting patient management and treatment, transforming medical education and facilitating clinical research. Meanwhile, we also enumerated researchers’ concerns arising along with its broad and satisfactory applications. As it is irreversible that AI will gradually permeate every aspect of modern life, we hope that this review can not only promote people’s understanding of the potential applications of ChatGPT in the future, but also remind them to be more cautious about this “Pandora’s Box” in the medical field. It is necessary to establish normative guidelines for its safe use in the medical field as soon as possible.

surgery
Modified Boltzmann Transport Equation and Freeze Out

L. Csernai,V. Magas,E. Molnár,Á. Nýıri,K. Tamosiunas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2004-10251-1

2005-05-26

Abstract:
ChatGPT in medicine: A cross-disciplinary systematic review of ChatGPT's (artificial intelligence) role in research, clinical practice, education, and patient interaction

Afia Fatima,Muhammad Ashir Shafique,Khadija Alam,Tagwa Kalool Fadlalla Ahmed,Muhammad Saqlain Mustafa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039250

2024-08-09

Abstract:Background: ChatGPT, a powerful AI language model, has gained increasing prominence in medicine, offering potential applications in healthcare, clinical decision support, patient communication, and medical research. This systematic review aims to comprehensively assess the applications of ChatGPT in healthcare education, research, writing, patient communication, and practice while also delineating potential limitations and areas for improvement. Method: Our comprehensive database search retrieved relevant papers from PubMed, Medline and Scopus. After the screening process, 83 studies met the inclusion criteria. This review includes original studies comprising case reports, analytical studies, and editorials with original findings. Result: ChatGPT is useful for scientific research and academic writing, and assists with grammar, clarity, and coherence. This helps non-English speakers and improves accessibility by breaking down linguistic barriers. However, its limitations include probable inaccuracy and ethical issues, such as bias and plagiarism. ChatGPT streamlines workflows and offers diagnostic and educational potential in healthcare but exhibits biases and lacks emotional sensitivity. It is useful in inpatient communication, but requires up-to-date data and faces concerns about the accuracy of information and hallucinatory responses. Conclusion: Given the potential for ChatGPT to transform healthcare education, research, and practice, it is essential to approach its adoption in these areas with caution due to its inherent limitations.
Current Status of ChatGPT Use in Medical Education: Potentials, Challenges, and Strategies

Tianhui Xu,Huiting Weng,Fang Liu,Li Yang,Yuanyuan Luo,Ziwei Ding,Qin Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/57896

2024-08-28

Abstract:ChatGPT, a generative pretrained transformer, has garnered global attention and sparked discussions since its introduction on November 30, 2022. However, it has generated controversy within the realms of medical education and scientific research. This paper examines the potential applications, limitations, and strategies for using ChatGPT. ChatGPT offers personalized learning support to medical students through its robust natural language generation capabilities, enabling it to furnish answers. Moreover, it has demonstrated significant use in simulating clinical scenarios, facilitating teaching and learning processes, and revitalizing medical education. Nonetheless, numerous challenges accompany these advancements. In the context of education, it is of paramount importance to prevent excessive reliance on ChatGPT and combat academic plagiarism. Likewise, in the field of medicine, it is vital to guarantee the timeliness, accuracy, and reliability of content generated by ChatGPT. Concurrently, ethical challenges and concerns regarding information security arise. In light of these challenges, this paper proposes targeted strategies for addressing them. First, the risk of overreliance on ChatGPT and academic plagiarism must be mitigated through ideological education, fostering comprehensive competencies, and implementing diverse evaluation criteria. The integration of contemporary pedagogical methodologies in conjunction with the use of ChatGPT serves to enhance the overall quality of medical education. To enhance the professionalism and reliability of the generated content, it is recommended to implement measures to optimize ChatGPT's training data professionally and enhance the transparency of the generation process. This ensures that the generated content is aligned with the most recent standards of medical practice. Moreover, the enhancement of value alignment and the establishment of pertinent legislation or codes of practice address ethical concerns, including those pertaining to algorithmic discrimination, the allocation of medical responsibility, privacy, and security. In conclusion, while ChatGPT presents significant potential in medical education, it also encounters various challenges. Through comprehensive research and the implementation of suitable strategies, it is anticipated that ChatGPT's positive impact on medical education will be harnessed, laying the groundwork for advancing the discipline and fostering the development of high-caliber medical professionals.

Dosimetry of strontium-90 in swine bones. BNWL-1050.

Exploring factors influencing user perspective of ChatGPT as a technology that assists in healthcare decision making: A cross sectional survey study

Understanding Health Care Students' Perceptions, Beliefs, and Attitudes Toward AI-Powered Language Models: Cross-Sectional Study

Public comfort with the use of ChatGPT and expectations for healthcare

User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-sectional Survey Study

Using ChatGPT for Clinical Practice and Medical Education: Cross-Sectional Survey of Medical Students’ and Physicians’ Perceptions

ChatGPT and Clinical Training: Perception, Concerns, and Practice of Pharm-D Students

Utility of ChatGPT in Clinical Practice

Non‐redundant inhibitor of differentiation (Id) gene expression and function in human prostate epithelial cells

Attitude and utilization of ChatGPT among registered nurses: A cross-sectional study

The Impact of Performance Expectancy, Workload, Risk, and Satisfaction on Trust in ChatGPT: Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis

Use of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification to assess perioperative risk in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

Medical Student Experiences and Perceptions of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence: Cross-Sectional Study

The Potential Applications and Challenges of ChatGPT in the Medical Field

Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis

ChatGPT: A Conceptual Review of Applications and Utility in the Field of Medicine

High-chloride concentrations abolish the binding of adenine nucleotides in the mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier family.

ChatGPT in medicine: prospects and challenges: a review article

Modified Boltzmann Transport Equation and Freeze Out

ChatGPT in medicine: A cross-disciplinary systematic review of ChatGPT's (artificial intelligence) role in research, clinical practice, education, and patient interaction

Current Status of ChatGPT Use in Medical Education: Potentials, Challenges, and Strategies