Autoreactive B cells remain active despite clinical disease control in rheumatoid arthritis

Sam Neppelenbroek,Nienke J Blomberg,Arieke S B Kampstra,Joost G K van der Hem,Tom W J Huizinga,René E M Toes,Hans U Scherer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2024.103320
2024-09-28
Abstract:Background: Autoimmune diseases (AIDs) are frequently hallmarked by the presence of autoreactive B cell responses which are involved in disease pathogenesis. However, the dynamics of such responses and their relation to clinical disease activity in humans is poorly understood. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a prototypic chronic AID, is hallmarked by B cell responses directed against citrullinated proteins. Objective: To determine the relation between the activity of the anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) B cell response and clinical disease activity in ACPA+ patients with RA. Methods: Expression of B cell activation markers by ACPA+, tetanus toxoid (TT)+ and ACPA- memory B cells (MBCs) from peripheral blood of ACPA+ RA patients receiving different treatments was analyzed by flow cytometry. Results were correlated to clinical disease activity. Results: Compared to TT+ and ACPA- MBCs, ACPA+ MBCs displayed a highly activated phenotype as evidenced by increased expression of Ki-67, CD86, CD80, CD19 and CD20 and reduced expression of CD32. The activated phenotype of ACPA+ MBCs did not associate with clinical disease activity in a cross-sectional analysis of RA patients treated with various therapeutic agents. Also, in a longitudinal analysis of patients treated with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, ACPA+ MBCs retained their activated phenotype despite effective control of inflammation and clinical disease. Conclusion: ACPA+ MBCs remain active despite clinical disease control in patients with RA across a range of interventions. This persistent activity indicates the absence of immunological remission and might explain why ACPA+ patients rarely reach sustained drug-free remission and frequently flare upon drug tapering.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?